World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
70
Citations
23387
World Ranking
2240
National Ranking
1306

Thomas E. Scruggs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas E. Scruggs sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 244 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Thomas E. Scruggs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas E. Scruggs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas E. Scruggs is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States, contributing to academic research primarily through this institution.

Although there are no recent papers, frequent co-authors, or recorded publication venues listed, this affiliation situates them within an established academic environment known for diverse research activities. The lack of specific publications or topics does not preclude ongoing or future research contributions.

There are no details available on main fields of study, subfields, or dominant topics of work, and thus no explicit research themes or scholarly focuses can be identified from the current data.

Similarly, there are no book publications or awards recorded, which limits insight into broader academic influence or recognition.

This profile reflects the available data and indicates a professional association with a recognized university, consistent with engagement in scholarly pursuits within higher education.

Best Publications

  • Teacher Perceptions of Mainstreaming/Inclusion, 1958–1995: A Research Synthesis:

    Thomas E. Scruggs;Margo A. Mastropieri

  • Co-Teaching in Inclusive Classrooms: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research

    Thomas E. Scruggs;Margo A. Mastropieri;Kimberly A. McDuffie

  • The Inclusive Classroom: Strategies for Effective Differentiated Instruction

    Margo A. Mastropieri;Thomas E. Scruggs

  • The Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research Methodology and Validation

    Thomas E. Scruggs;Margo A. Mastropieri;Glendon Casto

  • Summarizing Single-Subject Research Issues and Applications

    Thomas E. Scruggs;Margo A. Mastropieri

  • Case Studies in Co-Teaching in the Content Areas: Successes, Failures, and Challenges

    Margo A. Mastropieri;Thomas E. Scruggs;Janet Graetz;Jennifer Norland

  • The Inclusive Classroom: Strategies for Effective Instruction

    Margo A. Mastropieri;Thomas E. Scruggs

  • Best Practices in Promoting Reading Comprehension in Students with Learning Disabilities 1976 to 1996

    Margo A. Mastropieri;Thomas E. Scruggs

  • Reading Comprehension Instruction for Secondary Students: Challenges for Struggling Students and Teachers

    Margo A. Mastropieri;Thomas E. Scruggs;Janet E. Graetz

  • Promoting Inclusion in Secondary Classrooms

    Margo A. Mastropieri;Thomas E. Scruggs

  • Effective Instruction for Special Education

    Margo A. Mastropieri;Thomas E. Scruggs

  • Differentiated Curriculum Enhancement in Inclusive Middle School Science: Effects on Classroom and High-Stakes Tests.

    Margo A. Mastropieri;Thomas E. Scruggs;Jennifer J. Norland;Sheri Berkeley

  • How to Summarize Single-Participant Research: Ideas and Applications

    Thomas E. Scruggs;Margo A. Mastropieri

  • ON BABIES AND BATHWATER: ADDRESSING THE PROBLEMS OF IDENTIFICATION OF LEARNING DISABILITIES

    Thomas E. Scruggs;Margo A. Mastropieri

  • Early Intervention for Children with Conduct Disorders: A Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research.

    Thomas E. Scruggs;Margo A. Mastropieri;Stephen B. Cook;Colette Escobar

  • Reading Comprehension Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities, 1995—2006: A Meta-Analysis:

    Sheri Berkeley;Thomas E. Scruggs;Margo A. Mastropieri

  • PND at 25 Past, Present, and Future Trends in Summarizing Single-Subject Research

    Thomas E. Scruggs;Margo A. Mastropieri

  • Differential Effects of Peer Tutoring in Co-Taught and Non-Co-Taught Classes: Results for Content Learning and Student-Teacher Interactions:

    Kimberly A. McDuffie;Margo A. Mastropieri;Thomas E. Scruggs

  • Teacher Attitudes in Italy After Twenty Years of Inclusion

    Cesare Cornoldi;Alessandra Terreni;Thomas E. Scruggs;Margo A. Mastropieri

  • Feasibility and Consequences of Response to Intervention Examination of the Issues and Scientific Evidence as a Model for the Identification of Individuals with Learning Disabilities

    Margo A. Mastropieri;Thomas E. Scruggs

Frequent Co-Authors

Margo A. Mastropieri
Margo A. Mastropieri George Mason University
Joel R. Levin
Joel R. Levin University of Arizona
Steven R. Forness
Steven R. Forness University of California, Los Angeles
Kenneth A. Kavale
Kenneth A. Kavale Regent University
Donald Guthrie
Donald Guthrie University of California, Los Angeles
Cesare Cornoldi
Cesare Cornoldi University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology or counseling can open the door to a variety of rewarding career paths, including becoming a licensed professional counselor (LPC). As demand for mental health professionals grows, online programs provide increased flexibility for students balancing work, family, or location constraints.

However, it’s important to understand that LPC licensure requirements vary by state. For example, students interested in practicing in Nevada should review the lpc licensure requirements in Nevada. Similarly, each state—such as New Hampshire, New Jersey, and New Mexico—has distinct standards for education, supervised experience, and examination.

For those considering New England, you’ll find additional information on New Hampshire lpc licensure requirements. In the Mid-Atlantic, it's vital to check out the lpc licensure requirements in New Jersey. If your goal is to practice in the Southwest, be sure to learn how to get an lpc license in New Mexico.

Verifying state-specific licensing rules ensures that your online degree prepares you for licensure and a successful career in counseling wherever you choose to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas E. Scruggs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles