World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kimberly J. Vannest

Kimberly J. Vannest

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 31 11037 10330 5755 5255 111 9953

Kimberly J. Vannest publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kimberly J. Vannest between 2005 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kimberly J. Vannest published across 20 years, from 2005 to 2024, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2021. 4 of the 132 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2021. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication
2005 2024

132 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kimberly J. Vannest: publications per year, 2005 to 2024
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 9
2009 13
2010 5
2011 10
2012 6
2013 15
2014 5
2015 4
2016 4
2017 5
2018 3
2019 10
2020 10
2021 16
2022 9
2023 3
2024 1
Total 132
Download as CSV

Kimberly J. Vannest publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly J. Vannest sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 111
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kimberly J. Vannest D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly J. Vannest sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398 31
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kimberly J. Vannest is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology and neuroscience, with a focus on developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, and occupational therapy.

Their work covers a variety of topics including autism spectrum disorder research, behavioral and psychological studies, assistive technology in communication and mobility, family and disability support research, disability education and employment, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills.

Frequent publication venues for Kimberly J. Vannest include:

  • Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Behavioral Disorders
  • Exceptionality
  • Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities
  • Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning

Collaborations have been an integral part of their work, with notable frequent co-authors including April Haas, Sanikan Wattanawongwan, Jennifer B. Ganz, Mary Rose Sallese, and Lauren M. Pierson.

Examples of recent papers authored or co-authored by Kimberly J. Vannest are:

  • Benchmarking effect sizes in single-case experimental designs, 2021, Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention

Other related recent publications where Kimberly J. Vannest is listed among authors include studies on peer-mediated instruction for students with autism spectrum disorders, quantitative synthesis of intervention research in behavioral disorders, communication outcomes in AAC implementation for individuals with ASD and IDD, and teacher-mediated interventions to improve mathematical performance among students with emotional and behavioral disorders.

Their research contributions focus primarily on improving understanding and intervention strategies within autism spectrum disorders and related developmental and behavioral conditions. The integration of assistive technologies in communication and mobility also features prominently in their work.

Kimberly J. Vannest's scholarly activity reflects a multidisciplinary approach intersecting psychology and neuroscience, particularly cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, and clinical psychology.

Best Publications

  • Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U.

    Richard I. Parker;Kimberly J. Vannest;John L. Davis;Stephanie B. Sauber

  • An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs.

    Richard I. Parker;Kimberly J. Vannest

  • Effect Size in Single-Case Research: A Review of Nine Nonoverlap Techniques

    Richard I. Parker;Kimberly J. Vannest;John L. Davis

  • Evaluating Intervention Effects in Single‐Case Research Designs

    Kimberly J. Vannest;Jennifer Ninci

  • Percentage of All Non-Overlapping Data (PAND) An Alternative to PND

    Richard I. Parker;Shanna Hagan-Burke;Kimberly Vannest

  • The Improvement Rate Difference for Single-Case Research

    Richard I. Parker;Kimberly J. Vannest;Leanne Brown

  • Academic Benefits of Peer Tutoring: A Meta-Analytic Review of Single-Case Research.

    Lisa Bowman-Perrott;Heather Davis;Kimberly Vannest;Lauren Williams

  • Teacher Time Use in Special Education

    Kimberly J. Vannest;Shanna Hagan-Burke

  • Praise Counts: Using Self-Monitoring to Increase Effective Teaching Practices

    Tara M. Kalis;Kimberly J. Vannest;Rich Parker

  • Effective intervention for behavior with a daily behavior report card: A meta-analysis.

    Kimberly J. Vannest;John L. Davis;Cole R. Davis;Benjamin A. Mason

  • Effect Sizes in Single Case Research: How Large Is Large?

    Richard I. Parker;Daniel F. Brossart;Kimberly J. Vannest;James R. Long

  • Promoting Positive Behavior Using the Good Behavior Game: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research

    Lisa Bowman-Perrott;Mack D. Burke;Samar Zaini;Nan Zhang

  • Bottom-Up Analysis of Single-Case Research Designs

    Richard I. Parker;Kimberly J. Vannest

  • Common Problem Behaviors of Children and Adolescents in General Education Classrooms in the United States

    Judith R. Harrison;Kimberly Vannest;John Davis;Cecil Reynolds

  • High-technology augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and complex communication needs: a meta-analysis

    Jennifer B. Ganz;Kristi L. Morin;Margaret J. Foster;Kimberly J. Vannest

  • Adequate Yearly Progress for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders Through Research-Based Practices

    Kimberly J. Vannest;Kimberly K. Temple-Harvey;Benjamin A. Mason

  • Incorporating nonoverlap indices with visual analysis for quantifying intervention effectiveness in single-case experimental designs.

    Daniel F Brossart;Kimberly J Vannest;John L Davis;Marc A Patience

  • Interrater Agreement Between Visual Analysts of Single-Case Data A Meta-Analysis

    Jennifer Ninci;Kimberly J. Vannest;Victor Willson;Nan Zhang

  • Encyclopedia of special education : a reference for the education of children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities and other exceptional individuals

    Cecil R. Reynolds;Kimberly J Vannest;Elaine Fletcher-Janzen

  • Educator and Administrator Perceptions of the Impact of No Child Left Behind on Special Populations

    Kimberly J. Vannest;Lakshmi Mahadevan;Benjamin A. Mason;Kimberly K. Temple-Harvey

  • Computer aided self-monitoring to increase academic production and reduce self-injurious behavior in a child with autism

    Denise A. Soares;Kimberly J. Vannest;Judith Harrison

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard I. Parker
Richard I. Parker Texas A&M University
Jennifer B. Ganz
Jennifer B. Ganz Texas A&M University
Cecil R. Reynolds
Cecil R. Reynolds Texas A&M University
Victor L. Willson
Victor L. Willson Texas A&M University
Joe Reichle
Joe Reichle University of Minnesota
Bruce Thompson
Bruce Thompson Texas A&M University
Charles R. Greenwood
Charles R. Greenwood University of Kansas
Mandy Rispoli
Mandy Rispoli University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of professional pathways, especially in counseling and therapy roles. One of the most common routes is becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), which requires a combination of academic credentials, supervised experience, and licensure exams. While the fundamental steps are similar, specific requirements can vary by state and city.

For example, Cleveland licensed therapist requirements emphasize state-approved graduate degrees, supervised clinical experience, and passing relevant exams. If you’re planning to practice in Colorado, be sure to review the Colorado Springs licensed therapist education requirements for details on local standards and internship hours.

Likewise, anyone interested in counseling careers in Ohio should check out the Columbus licensed therapist education requirements. Aspiring therapists in Texas will benefit from learning how to become a licensed therapist in Corpus Christi, as regulations and processes can differ significantly from other regions.

Exploring online psychology degrees is an excellent step for meeting these evolving requirements and building a flexible, respected career in mental health or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Kimberly J. Vannest

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles