World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4058
World Ranking
10944
National Ranking
5716

Daniel M. Maggin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Maggin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 78 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel M. Maggin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Maggin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Using Teacher Praise and Opportunities to Respond to Promote Appropriate Student Behavior

    Tara C. Moore Partin;Rachel E. Robertson;Daniel M. Maggin;Regina M. Oliver

  • Is Performance Feedback for Educators an Evidence-Based Practice? A Systematic Review and Evaluation Based on Single-Case Research

    Lindsay M. Fallon;Melissa A. Collier-Meek;Daniel M. Maggin;Lisa M. H. Sanetti

  • An Application of the What Works Clearinghouse Standards for Evaluating Single-Subject Research: Synthesis of the Self-Management Literature Base

    Daniel M. Maggin;Amy M. Briesch;Sandra M. Chafouleas

  • A Systematic Evaluation of Token Economies as a Classroom Management Tool for Students with Challenging Behavior.

    Daniel M. Maggin;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Katelyn M. Goddard;Austin H. Johnson

  • A Systematic Evidence Review of the Check-In/Check-Out Program for Reducing Student Challenging Behaviors.

    Daniel M. Maggin;Jamie Zurheide;Kayci C. Pickett;Sara J. Baillie

  • A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior ☆

    Daniel M. Maggin;Austin H. Johnson;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Laura M. Ruberto

  • A generalized least squares regression approach for computing effect sizes in single-case research: application examples.

    Daniel M. Maggin;Hariharan Swaminathan;Helen J. Rogers;Breda V. O'Keeffe

  • Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading (R-CBM): a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of evidence supporting use in universal screening.

    Stephen P. Kilgus;Scott A. Methe;Daniel M. Maggin;Jessica L. Tomasula

  • A Quantitative Synthesis of Methodology in the Meta-Analysis of Single-Subject Research for Students with Disabilities: 1985–2009

    Daniel M. Maggin;Breda V. O'Keeffe;Austin H. Johnson

  • A Comparison of the Instructional Context for Students with Behavioral Issues Enrolled in Self-Contained and General Education Classrooms.

    Daniel M. Maggin;Joseph H. Wehby;Tara C. Moore Partin;Rachel Robertson

  • Reliability, Validity, and Usability of Data Extraction Programs for Single-Case Research Designs.

    Mariola Moeyaert;Daniel Maggin;Jay Verkuilen

  • The Impact of Working Alliance, Social Validity, and Teacher Burnout on Implementation Fidelity of the Good Behavior Game

    Joseph H. Wehby;Daniel M. Maggin;Tara C. Moore Partin;Rachel Robertson

  • A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Group Contingency Interventions for Students With Challenging Behavior: An Update:

    Daniel M. Maggin;James E. Pustejovsky;Austin H. Johnson

  • Evaluating Sensitivity to Behavioral Change Using Direct Behavior Rating Single-Item Scales:

    Sandra M. Chafouleas;Lisa M. H. Sanetti;Stephen P. Kilgus;Daniel M. Maggin

  • Meta‐analysis of mindfulness training on teacher well‐being

    Kary Zarate;Daniel M. Maggin;Amanda Passmore

  • Technology-Aided Instruction and Intervention for Students With ASD: A Meta-Analysis Using Novel Methods of Estimating Effect Sizes for Single-Case Research:

    Erin E. Barton;James E. Pustejovsky;Daniel M. Maggin;Brian Reichow

  • Development and applications of the single-case design risk of bias tool for evaluating single-case design research study reports.

    Brian Reichow;Erin E. Barton;Daniel M. Maggin

  • Intensive Interventions for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Issues, Theory, and Future Directions

    Daniel M. Maggin;Joseph H. Wehby;Thomas W. Farmer;Debbie S. Brooks

  • A Comparison of Rubrics for Identifying Empirically Supported Practices with Single-Case Research

    Daniel M. Maggin;Amy M. Briesch;Sandra M. Chafouleas;Tyler D. Ferguson

  • Introduction to the Special Series Issues and Advances of Synthesizing Single-Case Research

    Daniel M. Maggin;Sandra M. Chafouleas

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph H. Wehby
Joseph H. Wehby Vanderbilt University
Bryan G. Cook
Bryan G. Cook University of Virginia
Sandra M. Chafouleas
Sandra M. Chafouleas University of Connecticut
Brian Reichow
Brian Reichow University of Connecticut Health Center
Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti
Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti University of Connecticut
George Sugai
George Sugai University of Connecticut
Kathleen Lynne Lane
Kathleen Lynne Lane University of Kansas
Frank J. Symons
Frank J. Symons University of Minnesota
Kevin S. Sutherland
Kevin S. Sutherland Virginia Commonwealth University
Amy M. Briesch
Amy M. Briesch Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel M. Maggin

Recently Published Articles