World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wim Van Den Noortgate

Wim Van Den Noortgate

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
15490
World Ranking
3514
National Ranking
44

Wim Van Den Noortgate publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim Van Den Noortgate sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 334 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Wim Van Den Noortgate D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim Van Den Noortgate sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wim Van Den Noortgate is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and specializes in the field of Psychology, with a research focus that spans several subfields including Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The research topics most commonly addressed by Van Den Noortgate include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Van Den Noortgate has contributed to various publication venues, most frequently publishing in:

  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
  • British Journal of Educational Technology
  • Methodology
  • Thinking Skills and Creativity

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Van Den Noortgate are:

  • The application of meta-analytic (multi-level) models with multiple random effects: A systematic review, 2020, Behavior Research Methods
  • Towards measuring cognitive load through multimodal physiological data, 2020, Cognition Technology & Work
  • Does the Fourth-Grade Slump in Creativity Actually Exist? A Meta-analysis of the Development of Divergent Thinking in School-Age Children and Adolescents, 2020, Educational Psychology Review
  • Visual representations of meta-analyses of multiple outcomes: Extensions to forest plots, funnel plots, and caterpillar plots, 2020, Methodology
  • Cognitive support for assembly operations by means of augmented reality: an exploratory study, 2020, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

Van Den Noortgate frequently collaborates with several scholars, including Karla Van Leeuwen, Guy Bosmans, Luc Goossens, Patricia Bijttebier, and Belén Fernández-Castilla.

Best Publications

  • The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis

    Marlies Houben;Wim Van Den Noortgate;Peter Kuppens

  • Three-level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes

    Wim Van den Noortgate;José Antonio López-López;Fulgencio Marín-Martínez;Julio Sánchez-Meca

  • Mechanisms of masked priming: a meta-analysis.

    Eva Van den Bussche;Wim Van den Noortgate;Bert Reynvoet

  • Emotion fingerprints or emotion populations? A meta-analytic investigation of autonomic features of emotion categories.

    Erika H. Siegel;Molly K. Sands;Wim Van den Noortgate;Paul Condon

  • Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes: a multilevel approach

    Wim Van den Noortgate;José Antonio López-López;Fulgencio Marín-Martínez;Julio Sánchez-Meca

  • The effects of early prevention programs for families with young children at risk for physical child abuse and neglect: A meta-analysis

    Liesl Geeraert;Wim Van den Noortgate;Hans Grietens;Patrick Onghena

  • Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis

    Maribel Montero Perez;Wim Van Den Noortgate;Piet Desmet

  • Global processing takes time: A meta-analysis on local-global visual processing in ASD.

    Ruth Van der Hallen;Kris Evers;Katrien Brewaeys;Wim Van den Noortgate

  • Gender Differences in Loneliness across the Lifespan: A Meta–Analysis:

    Marlies Maes;Marlies Maes;Pamela Qualter;Janne Vanhalst;Wim Van den Noortgate

  • Students’ misconceptions of statistical inference: A review of the empirical evidence from research on statistics education

    Ana Elisa Castro Sotos;Stijn Vanhoof;Wim Van den Noortgate;Patrick Onghena

  • Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes

    Annelies Raes;Pieter Vanneste;Marieke Pieters;Ine Windey

  • Enjoying mathematics or feeling competent in mathematics? Reciprocal effects on mathematics achievement and perceived math effort expenditure

    Maarten Pinxten;Herbert W. Marsh;Bieke De Fraine;Wim Van Den Noortgate

  • Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis: a comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis

    Mariola Moeyaert;Maaike Ugille;S. Natasha Beretvas;John Ferron

  • Behavioral Engagement, Peer Status, and Teacher-Student Relationships in Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study on Reciprocal Influences

    Maaike C. Engels;Hilde Colpin;Karla Van Leeuwen;Patricia Bijttebier

  • Approaches to Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review

    Sameh Said-Metwaly;Wim Van den Noortgate;Eva Kyndt

  • Multilevel Meta-Analysis: A Comparison with Traditional Meta-Analytical Procedures

    Wim Van Den Noortgate;Patrick Onghena

  • Combining single-case experimental data using hierarchical linear models.

    Wim Van den Noortgate;Patrick Onghena

  • Hierarchical linear models for the quantitative integration of effect sizes in single-case research

    Wim Van Den Noortgate;Patrick Onghena

  • A multilevel meta-analysis of single-subject experimental design studies

    Wim Van den Noortgate;Patrick Onghena

  • Detecting Selection Bias in Meta-Analyses with Multiple Outcomes: A Simulation Study.

    Belén Fernández-Castilla;Lies Declercq;Laleh Jamshidi;S. Natasha Beretvas

  • Global Processing Takes Time: A Meta-Analysis on Local-Global Visual Processing in ASD

    Ruth Van der Hallen;Wim Van den Noortgate;Johan Wagemans;Kris Evers

Frequent Co-Authors

Luc Goossens
Luc Goossens KU Leuven
Hilde Colpin
Hilde Colpin KU Leuven
Jan Van Damme
Jan Van Damme KU Leuven
Eva Ceulemans
Eva Ceulemans KU Leuven
John M. Ferron
John M. Ferron University of South Florida
Michael Pluess
Michael Pluess Queen Mary University of London
Francesca Lionetti
Francesca Lionetti University of Pavia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree programs and career options. One promising pathway is in speech-language pathology, which combines psychological, educational, and health perspectives to support individuals with communication disorders.

To become a licensed speech-language pathologist (SLP), you need specialized education and meet state-specific certification requirements. These requirements vary across the country. For example, Kansas slp certification requirements outline the academic, practicum, and examination standards for SLPs in that state. Similarly, if you're interested in becoming certified in Kentucky, it's important to review the Kentucky speech pathologist certification requirements.

Other states also have unique pathways and standards. For instance, aspiring SLPs should be familiar with Louisiana slp certification requirements and slp requirements in Maine before pursuing work in those regions.

Online degrees in psychology often provide foundational knowledge that supports these career goals, while flexible learning options make it easier to meet the academic credentials needed for state licensure and certification.

Best Scientists Citing Wim Van Den Noortgate

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles