World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patricia Bijttebier

Patricia Bijttebier

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
10863
World Ranking
5205
National Ranking
74

Patricia Bijttebier publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia Bijttebier sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 384 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Patricia Bijttebier D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia Bijttebier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patricia Bijttebier is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their research spans clinical psychology, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology, political science, as well as developmental and educational psychology.

The scientist's principal topics of study include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, attachment and relationship dynamics, identity and memory in therapeutic contexts, anxiety and depression, cognitive processes related to treatment, family support during illness, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, and the impact of technology on adolescents.

Recent publications by Patricia Bijttebier include:

  • "Loneliness, Social Anxiety Symptoms, and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescence: Longitudinal Distinctiveness and Correlated Change" (2020), Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • "Gene-environment interaction: New insights into perceived parenting and social anxiety among adolescents" (2020), European Psychiatry
  • "Narrative coherence predicts emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-year longitudinal study" (2021), Cognition & Emotion
  • "Autobiographical memory coherence in emotional disorders: The role of rumination, cognitive avoidance, executive functioning, and meaning making" (2020), PLoS ONE
  • "First look at the five-factor model personality facet associations with sensory processing sensitivity" (2020), Current Psychology

Frequent co-authors working with this scientist include Guy Bosmans, Karla Van Leeuwen, Luc Goossens, Wim Van Den Noortgate, and Dirk Hermans.

Their work has been published frequently in venues such as:

  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • PLoS ONE
  • Cognition & Emotion
  • Current Psychology
  • Journal of Adolescence

Patricia Bijttebier's research contributions involve significant collaborations and interdisciplinary approaches, emphasizing psychological development and mental health issues in youth populations, while also addressing methodological aspects related to cognitive and emotional processes.

Best Publications

  • The child version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS-C): a preliminary validation

    Geert Crombez;Patricia Bijttebier;Chris Eccleston;Tamara Mascagni

  • Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality-psychopathology associations.

    Patricia Bijttebier;Ilse Beck;Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken

  • A confirmatory factor analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: invariant factor structure across clinical and non-clinical populations.

    Stefaan Van Damme;Geert Crombez;Patricia Bijttebier;Liesbet Goubert

  • Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda.

    Corina U. Greven;Corina U. Greven;Francesca Lionetti;Charlotte Booth;Elaine N. Aron

  • Assessing the Affective Features of Psychopathy in Adolescence: A Further Validation of the Inventory of Callous and Unemotional Traits

    Annelore Roose;Patricia Bijttebier;Stefaan Decoene;Laurence Claes

  • Confirmatory factor analysis of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: invariant two-factor model across low back pain patients and fibromyalgia patients.

    Liesbet Goubert;Geert Crombez;Stefaan Van Damme;Johan W S Vlaeyen

  • Catastrophic Thinking About Pain is Independently Associated with Pain Severity, Disability, and Somatic Complaints in School Children and Children with Chronic Pain

    Tine Vervoort;Liesbet Goubert;Christopher Eccleston;Patricia Bijttebier

  • It is all in their mind: A review on information processing bias in lonely individuals

    Annette W.M. Spithoven;Patricia Bijttebier;Luc Goossens

  • Brief report: the association between non-suicidal self-injury, self-concept and acquaintance with self-injurious peers in a sample of adolescents.

    Laurence Claes;Adinda Houben;Walter Vandereycken;Patricia Bijttebier

  • Behavioral Engagement, Peer Status, and Teacher-Student Relationships in Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study on Reciprocal Influences

    Maaike C. Engels;Hilde Colpin;Karla Van Leeuwen;Patricia Bijttebier

  • Temperament and risk for depressive symptoms in adolescence: mediation by rumination and moderation by effortful control.

    Katrien Verstraeten;Michael W. Vasey;Filip Raes;Patricia Bijttebier

  • Needs of relatives of critical care patients: perceptions of relatives, physicians and nurses

    Patricia Bijttebier;S Vanoost;D Delva;Patrick Ferdinande

  • Coping strategies in relation to personality disorders

    Patricia Bijttebier;Hans Vertommen

  • Integration of autologous dendritic cell-based immunotherapy in the primary treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a pilot study.

    Hilko Ardon;Stefaan Van Gool;Isabel Spencer Lopes;Wim Maes

  • Understanding comorbidity among internalizing problems: Integrating latent structural models of psychopathology and risk mechanisms.

    Benjamin L. Hankin;Hannah R. Snyder;Lauren D. Gulley;Tina H. Schweizer

  • Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation system scales and the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire in a sample of eating disordered patients

    Ilse Beck;Dirk J.M. Smits;Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken

  • Emotional reactivity and self-regulation in relation to compulsive buying

    Laurence Claes;Patricia Bijttebier;Frederique Van Den Eynde;James E. Mitchell

  • Using self-reported callous-unemotional traits to cross-nationally assess the DSM-5 ‘With Limited Prosocial Emotions’ specifier

    Eva R. Kimonis;Kostas A. Fanti;Paul J. Frick;Paul J. Frick;Terrie E. Moffitt;Terrie E. Moffitt

  • Specificity of worry and rumination in the development of anxiety and depressive symptoms in children

    Katrien Verstraeten;Patricia Bijttebier;Michael W. Vasey;Filip Raes

  • Internalizing Problems in Adolescence: Linking Loneliness, Social Anxiety Symptoms, and Depressive Symptoms Over Time.

    Sofie Danneel;Stefanie Nelemans;Annette Spithoven;Margot Bastin

  • Reliability and Validity of the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory in a Dutch-speaking Belgian sample

    Patricia Bijttebier;D Delva;S Vanoost;Herman Bobbaers

Frequent Co-Authors

Luc Goossens
Luc Goossens KU Leuven
Filip Raes
Filip Raes KU Leuven
Hilde Colpin
Hilde Colpin KU Leuven
Michael W. Vasey
Michael W. Vasey The Ohio State University
Herbert Roeyers
Herbert Roeyers Ghent University
Dirk Hermans
Dirk Hermans KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and diverse career pathways. One of the most popular avenues for psychology graduates is substance abuse counseling, a field that continues to experience high demand nationwide.

Those interested in this rewarding profession can find specific guidance tailored to different locations. For example, learn how to become a substance abuse counselor in Houston, or discover the steps to how to become a substance abuse counselor in Huntsville. If you’re seeking opportunities in Indiana, you can explore how to become a substance abuse counselor in Indianapolis. For those considering the West Coast, read more about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Irvine.

Online degree programs in psychology and counseling provide the flexibility to specialize in substance abuse, mental health, or other areas. By understanding state-specific requirements and utilizing accredited online education, students can confidently plan their next steps toward a meaningful career in counseling and make a positive impact in their communities.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia Bijttebier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles