World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Filip Raes

Filip Raes

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4314 3986 60 57 391 18732

Filip Raes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Filip Raes between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Filip Raes published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 16.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2012. 23 of the 432 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2012. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 30 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 12 publications
2000 2025

432 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Filip Raes: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 2
2002 5
2003 9
2004 9
2005 13
2006 14
2007 14
2008 18
2009 26
2010 19
2011 24
2012 34
2013 30
2014 27
2015 29
2016 25
2017 19
2018 24
2019 23
2020 15
2021 11
2022 9
2023 8
2024 11
2025 12
Total 432
Download as CSV

Filip Raes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filip Raes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 391–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 391 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57 391
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Filip Raes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filip Raes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Filip Raes is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has an extensive publication record in the field of Psychology, with a focus on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Social Psychology.

Their research covers a range of mental health and cognitive topics, including Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes; Identity, Memory, and Therapy; Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development; Mental Health Research Topics; Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions; Memory Processes and Influences; and Resilience and Mental Health.

Filip Raes has published in prominent journals with multiple contributions to:

  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Psychologica Belgica
  • Mindfulness
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Public Health

Recent papers include:

  • Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on cancer-related cognitive impairment: Results of a randomized controlled functional magnetic resonance imaging pilot study (2020, Cancer)
  • Changing the future: An initial test of Future Specificity Training (FeST) (2020, Behaviour Research and Therapy)
  • Computerized Memory Specificity Training (c-MeST) for major depression: A randomised controlled trial (2020, Behaviour Research and Therapy)
  • The Impact of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Brain Functional Connectivity: a Systematic Review (2022, Mindfulness)
  • The current state of memory Specificity Training (MeST) for emotional disorders (2021, Current Opinion in Psychology)

Frequent co-authors of Filip Raes include:

  • Keisuke Takano
  • David John Hallford
  • Katleen Van der Gucht
  • Liesbeth Bogaert
  • Eline Belmans

Best Publications

  • Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale.

    Filip Raes;Elizabeth Pommier;Kristin D. Neff;Dinska Van Gucht

  • Autobiographical memory specificity and emotional disorder.

    J. Mark G. Williams;Thorsten Barnhofer;Catherine Crane;Dirk Hermans

  • Rumination and worry as mediators of the relationship between self-compassion and depression and anxiety

    Filip Raes

  • Mindfulness skills and interpersonal behaviour

    Mathias Dekeyser;Filip Raes;Mia Leijssen;Sara Leysen

  • Reducing cognitive vulnerability to depression: A preliminary investigation of MEmory Specificity Training (MEST) in inpatients with depressive symptomatology

    Filip Raes;J. Mark G. Williams;Dirk Hermans

  • Mental Imagery in Depression: Phenomenology, Potential Mechanisms, and Treatment Implications.

    Emily A. Holmes;Emily A. Holmes;Simon E. Blackwell;Stephanie Burnett Heyes;Stephanie Burnett Heyes;Fritz Renner

  • Brooding and Reflection as Subtypes of Rumination: Evidence from Confirmatory Factor Analysis in Nonclinical Samples using the Dutch Ruminative Response Scale

    Hanne Schoofs;Dirk Hermans;Filip Raes

  • School-based prevention and reduction of depression in adolescents: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a mindfulness group program

    Filip Raes;James W. Griffith;Katleen Van der Gucht;J. Mark G. Williams

  • Autobiographical memory specificity and affect regulation: an experimental approach.

    Filip Raes;Dirk Hermans;An de Decker;Paul Eelen

  • The Effect of Self-Compassion on the Development of Depression Symptoms in a Non-clinical Sample

    Filip Raes

  • Mindfulness and reduced cognitive reactivity to sad mood: evidence from a correlational study and a non-randomized waiting list controlled study.

    Filip Raes;David Dewulf;Cees Van Heeringen;J. Mark G. Williams

  • The Relationship between Mindfulness and Uncontrollability of Ruminative Thinking

    Filip Raes;J. Mark G. Williams

  • Reduced autobiographical memory specificity and rumination in predicting the course of depression.

    F Raes;D Hermans;Jmg Williams;Wim Beyers

  • Reduced specificity of autobiographical memory: a mediator between rumination and ineffective social problem-solving in major depression?

    Filip Raes;Dirk Hermans;J. Mark G. Williams;Koen Demyttenaere

  • Reduced autobiographical memory specificity and affect regulation

    Filip Raes;Filip Raes;Dirk Hermans;Dirk Hermans;J. Mark G. Williams;J. Mark G. Williams;Paul Eelen;Paul Eelen

  • Temperament and risk for depressive symptoms in adolescence: mediation by rumination and moderation by effortful control.

    Katrien Verstraeten;Michael W. Vasey;Filip Raes;Patricia Bijttebier

  • A sentence completion procedure as an alternative to the Autobiographical Memory Test for assessing overgeneral memory in non-clinical populations.

    Filip Raes;Dirk Hermans;J. Mark G. Williams;Paul Eelen

  • Dampening of positive affect prospectively predicts depressive symptoms in non-clinical samples

    Filip Raes;Jorien Smets;Sabine Nelis;Hanne Schoofs

  • Advancing psychotherapy and evidence-based psychological interventions

    Paul M.G. Emmelkamp;Paul M.G. Emmelkamp;Daniel David;Daniel David;Tom Beckers;Peter Muris

  • The Cognitive Building Blocks of Emotion Regulation: Ability to Update Working Memory Moderates the Efficacy of Rumination and Reappraisal on Emotion

    Madeline Lee Pe;Filip Raes;Peter Kuppens;Peter Kuppens

  • Autobiographical memory specificity and trauma in inpatient adolescents.

    An de Decker;Dirk Hermans;Filip Raes;Paul Eelen

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk Hermans
Dirk Hermans KU Leuven
Paul Eelen
Paul Eelen KU Leuven
J. Mark G. Williams
J. Mark G. Williams University of Oxford
Michael W. Vasey
Michael W. Vasey The Ohio State University
Guido Pieters
Guido Pieters KU Leuven
James W. Griffith
James W. Griffith Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA can open doors to a variety of career paths and online degree options. For those interested in clinical roles, online psychology programs can serve as a stepping stone to licensed professions such as counseling, therapy, or social work. Many students are also drawn toward specialized fields, including speech-language pathology—a growing and rewarding area.

If you are considering this path, you'll find that requirements vary by state. For instance, you can learn more about becoming a speech therapist in Mississippi or explore the steps involved in how to become a speech language pathologist in Missouri. Other states, such as how to become a speech language pathologist in Montana and becoming a speech therapist in Nebraska, offer further guidance on credentials, education, and licensure processes.

Whether you choose traditional or online schooling, these pathways combine your foundational knowledge in psychology with new skills to support individuals and communities in need.

Best Scientists Citing Filip Raes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles