World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Isabel Mesquita

Isabel Mesquita

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3456 3184 6 6 229 7246

Isabel Mesquita publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Isabel Mesquita between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Isabel Mesquita published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 12.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2010. 33 of the 315 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2010. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 36 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 14 publications
2001 2025

315 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Isabel Mesquita: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 3
2005 5
2006 5
2007 3
2008 10
2009 28
2010 36
2011 19
2012 14
2013 8
2014 19
2015 10
2016 13
2017 17
2018 18
2019 9
2020 5
2021 19
2022 17
2023 21
2024 19
2025 14
Total 315
Download as CSV

Isabel Mesquita publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isabel Mesquita sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 224–233 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 229 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213 229
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Isabel Mesquita D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isabel Mesquita sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Isabel Mesquita is affiliated with the University of Porto in Portugal. Their research spans multiple fields including Psychology, Social Sciences, and Health Professions. Within these, their work extensively covers subfields such as Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

The main topics addressed in Mesquita's research are diverse and include Physical Education and Pedagogy, Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, Sport Psychology and Performance, Sports Performance and Training, Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport, Physical Education and Sports Studies, and Sports Analytics and Performance.

Mesquita has contributed to several scholarly publications, often collaborating with other researchers. Frequent co-authors who have appeared alongside them in research include Patrícia Coutinho, Ana Ramos, Cláudio Farias, José Afonso, and Cristiana Bessa.

Their research has been published in multiple venues, with recurring publications in the following journals and periodicals:

  • Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto
  • Education Sciences
  • Retos
  • European Physical Education Review
  • International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Mesquita include:

  • Challenges faced by preservice and novice teachers in implementing student-centred models: A systematic review, 2021, European Physical Education Review
  • Sport Education and Traditional Teaching: Influence on Students' Empowerment and Self-Confidence in High School Physical Education Classes, 2021, Sustainability
  • What Actually Differs between Traditional Teaching and Sport Education in Students' Learning Outcomes? A Critical Systematic Review, 2021, Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
  • Developing Players' Tactical Knowledge Using Combined Constraints-Led and Step-Game Approaches-A Longitudinal Action-Research Study, 2020, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
  • The Influence of Parents, Coaches, and Peers in the Long-Term Development of Highly Skilled and Less Skilled Volleyball Players, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology

Best Publications

  • Princípios Táticos do Jogo de Futebol: conceitos e aplicação

    Israel Teoldo da Costa;Júlio Manuel Garganta da Silva;Pablo Juan Greco;Isabel Mesquita

  • The impact of a hybrid Sport Education–Invasion Games Competence Model soccer unit on students’ decision making, skill execution and overall game performance:

    Isabel Mesquita;Cláudio Farias;Peter Hastie

  • Talent development in sport: A critical review of pathways to expert performance:

    Patrícia Coutinho;Isabel Mesquita;António M Fonseca

  • ANALYSIS OF THE SETTER'S TACTICAL ACTION IN HIGH-PERFORMANCE WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL

    Jóse Afonso;Isabel Mesquita;Rui Marcelino;Jose António da Silva

  • Effects of quality of opposition and match status on technical and tactical performances in elite volleyball

    Rui Marcelino;Isabel Mesquita;Jaime Sampaio

  • The weight of terminal actions in Volleyball. Contributions of the spike, serve and block for the teams’ rankings in the World League 2005

    Rui Marcelino;Isabel Mesquita;José Afonso

  • Tactical Determinants of Setting Zone in Elite Men's Volleyball

    Jose Afonso;Francisca Esteves;Rui Araújo;Luke Thomas

  • Sistema de avaliação táctica no Futebol (FUT-SAT): Desenvolvimento e validação preliminar

    Israel Teoldo da Costa;Júlio Garganta;Pablo Juan Greco;Isabel Mesquita

  • Attack Efficacy in Volleyball: Elite Male Teams

    José Castro;Adriano Souza;Isabel Mesquita

  • Determinants of block cohesiveness and attack efficacy in high-level women's volleyball

    José Afonso;Isabel Mesquita

  • Determinants of attack tactics in Youth male elite volleyball

    Gustavo Conti Costa;R. Conselheiro Joaquim Caetano;Natália Neiva Ferreira;Gabriel Junqueira

  • Home advantage in high-level volleyball varies according to set number

    Rui Marcelino;Isabel Mesquita;José Manuel Palao Andrés;Jaime Sampaio

  • Attack and serve performances according to the match period and quality of opposition in elite volleyball matches

    Rui O. Marcelino;Jaime E. Sampaio;Isabel M Mesquita

  • Portuguese Coaches' Perceptions of and Preferences for Knowledge Sources Related to their Professional Background.

    Isabel Mesquita;Sofia Isidro;António Rosado

  • Relationship between the set outcome and the dig and attack efficacy in elite male Volleyball game

    Ricardo Monteiro;Isabel Mesquita;Rui Marcelino

  • Sex differences in discriminative power of volleyball game-related statistics.

    Paulo Vicente João;Nuno Leite;Isabel Mesquita;Jaime Sampaio

  • Coaching and Coach Education in Brazil

    Michel Milistetd;Pierre Trudel;Isabel Ribeiro Mesquita;Juarez Vieira do Nascimento

  • Game Performance and Understanding within a Hybrid Sport Education Season.

    Cláudio Filipe Farias;Isabel Ribeiro Mesquita;Peter A. Hastie

  • Towards a more equitable and inclusive learning environment in Sport Education: results of an action research-based intervention

    Cláudio Farias;Peter Andrew Hastie;Isabel Mesquita

  • Treatment of azo dye-containing wastewater by a Fenton-like process in a continuous packed-bed reactor filled with activated carbon.

    Isabel Mesquita;Luís C. Matos;Filipa Duarte;F.J. Maldonado-Hódar

  • What Do We Know About the Development of Personal and Social Skills within the Sport Education Model: A Systematic Review

    Cristiana Bessa;Peter Hastie;Rui Araújo;Isabel Mesquita

  • How structured and unstructured sport activities aid the development of expertise in volleyball players

    Patrícia Coutinho;Isabel Mesquita;Keith Davids;António M. Fonseca

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter A. Hastie
Peter A. Hastie Auburn University
Keith Davids
Keith Davids Sheffield Hallam University
Adélio Mendes
Adélio Mendes University of Porto
Jean Côté
Jean Côté Queen's University
Robyn L. Jones
Robyn L. Jones Cardiff Metropolitan University
José Alberto Pereira
José Alberto Pereira Polytechnic Institute of Bragança
Stephen C. Harvey
Stephen C. Harvey University of Pennsylvania
Pierre Trudel
Pierre Trudel University of Ottawa
Luis M. Madeira
Luis M. Madeira University of Porto
Francisco J. Maldonado-Hódar
Francisco J. Maldonado-Hódar University of Granada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a range of dynamic online degree options. For those considering a career in psychology or counseling, accredited psyd programs offer in-depth training focused on clinical practice and psychological assessment. If your passion is marriage and family therapy, lmft programs are designed specifically to prepare graduates for licensure and hands-on work with couples and families.

Students who want a flexible and cost-effective path should consider the best online masters in psychology. These programs provide a solid foundation in psychological theory, research, and practical skills, often at a more affordable rate. For those interested in leadership roles in education or policy, accelerated edd programs can fast-track your advancement, offering intensive coursework that can often be completed in less time than traditional doctoral degrees.

Each of these online degrees brings its own set of career opportunities and benefits. Prospective students should weigh factors like program accreditation, cost, time commitment, and state licensure requirements to find the best fit for their goals.

Best Scientists Citing Isabel Mesquita

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles