World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer

Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 72 2022 1833 119 114 322 27913

Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 16.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2018. 18 of the 372 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2018. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 35 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 12 publications
2003 2025

372 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 4
2008 3
2009 7
2010 27
2011 21
2012 25
2013 27
2014 22
2015 34
2016 22
2017 29
2018 35
2019 19
2020 19
2021 23
2022 11
2023 19
2024 6
2025 12
Total 372
Download as CSV

Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–330 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 322 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76 322
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 72
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer is affiliated with the University of Twente in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Psychology, with substantial contributions across related subfields including Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The principal topics of Bohlmeijer's work encompass mindfulness and compassion interventions, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, COVID-19 and mental health, digital mental health interventions, mental health research topics, optimism, hope, and well-being, and resilience and mental health.

Frequent publication venues where Bohlmeijer has contributed include Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Happiness Studies, Journal of Traumatic Stress, Journal of Affective Disorders, and International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology.

Bohlmeijer's recent papers include the following:

  • The relationship between emotion regulation and well-being in patients with mental disorders: A meta-analysis (2020, Comprehensive Psychiatry)
  • New Evidence in the Booming Field of Online Mindfulness: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2021, JMIR Mental Health)
  • Compassion-based interventions for people with long-term physical conditions: a mixed methods systematic review (2020, Psychology and Health)
  • Promoting Gratitude as a Resource for Sustainable Mental Health: Results of a 3-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial up to 6 Months Follow-up (2020, Journal of Happiness Studies)
  • The Model for Sustainable Mental Health: Future Directions for Integrating Positive Psychology Into Mental Health Care (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)

Bohlmeijer has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Jannis T. Kraiss
  • Peter M. ten Klooster
  • Constance H.C. Drossaert
  • Gerben J. Westerhof
  • Judith Austin

Best Publications

  • Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

    Linda Bolier;Merel Haverman;Gerben J Westerhof;Heleen Riper;Heleen Riper

  • Evaluating the psychometric properties of the mental health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)

    S.M.A. Lamers;Gerben Johan Westerhof;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;Peter M. ten Klooster

  • Psychometric properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form.

    Ernst Bohlmeijer;Peter M. ten Klooster;Martine Fledderus;Martine M. Veehof

  • The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction therapy on mental health of adults with a chronic medical disease: a meta-analysis.

    Ernst Bohlmeijer;Rilana Prenger;Erik Taal;Pim Cuijpers

  • Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    M.P.J. Spijkerman;W.T.M. Pots;E.T. Bohlmeijer

  • Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    M.M. Veehof;Maarten-Jan Oskam;Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer

  • Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review

    M.M. Veehof;H.R. Trompetter;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs

  • The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression are overestimated: a meta-analysis of study quality and effect size

    P. Cuijpers;A. van Straten;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;S.D. Hollon

  • Effects of reminiscence and life review on late-life depression: a meta-analysis

    Ernst Bohlmeijer;Filip Smit;Pim Cuijpers

  • The effects of reminiscence on psychological well-being in older adults: a meta-analysis

    Ernst Bohlmeijer;Marte Roemer;Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Filip Smit;Filip Smit

  • Efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression: meta-analytic study of publication bias

    P. Cuijpers;Filip Smit;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;Steven D. Hollon

  • Can We Increase Psychological Well-Being? The Effects of Interventions on Psychological Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Laura Anne Weiss;Gerben Johan Westerhof;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer

  • Reminiscence and mental health: a review of recent progress in theory, research and interventions

    Gerben Johan Westerhof;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;Jeffrey Dean Webster

  • Why Does Positive Mental Health Buffer Against Psychopathology? An Exploratory Study on Self-Compassion as a Resilience Mechanism and Adaptive Emotion Regulation Strategy

    Hester R. Trompetter;Elian de Kleine;Ernst T. Bohlmeijer

  • Mixing Online and Face-to-Face Therapy: How to Benefit From Blended Care in Mental Health Care.

    Jobke Wentzel;Rosalie van der Vaart;Ernst T Bohlmeijer;Julia E W C van Gemert-Pijnen

  • The effect of positive psychology interventions on well-being and distress in clinical samples with psychiatric or somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Farid Chakhssi;Jannis Thomas Kraiss;Maria Petronella Johanna Sommers-Spijkerman;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer

  • Efficacy of an early intervention based on acceptance and commitment therapy for adults with depressive symptomatology: Evaluation in a randomized controlled trial.

    Ernst T. Bohlmeijer;Martine Fledderus;T.A.J.J. Rokx;Marcel E. Pieterse

  • Mapping the Future of Reminiscence: A Conceptual Guide for Research and Practice

    Jeffrey Dean Webster;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;Gerben Johan Westerhof

  • The impact of emotional well-being on long-term recovery and survival in physical illness: a meta-analysis

    S.M.A. Lamers;Linda Bolier;Gerben Johan Westerhof;Filip Smit

  • Internet-based guided self-help intervention for chronic pain based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A randomized controlled trial

    H.R. Trompetter;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;M.M. Veehof;Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy as guided self-help for psychological distress and positive mental health: a randomized controlled trial.

    M. Fledderus;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;Marcel E. Pieterse;Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerben Johan Westerhof
Gerben Johan Westerhof University of Twente
Filip Smit
Filip Smit Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Saskia Marion Kelders
Saskia Marion Kelders University of Twente
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Maya J. Schroevers
Maya J. Schroevers University Medical Center Groningen
Allard J. van der Beek
Allard J. van der Beek Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Joop T. V. M. de Jong
Joop T. V. M. de Jong University of Amsterdam
Mariët Hagedoorn
Mariët Hagedoorn University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of psychology offers diverse online degree options, leading to varied career pathways such as counseling, academic research, and therapy. Many students interested in therapy choose to pursue specialized roles like Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), which require both academic and practical training.

MFT requirements vary by location, so it's essential to understand what each state and city mandates. For example, those seeking an MFT credential in New Jersey should be aware of the mft requirements in Newark, including education, supervised hours, and exams. Similarly, students looking into Norfolk mft certification requirements will find details relevant to Virginia.

Programs in Nevada have their own specifics. Understanding the North Las Vegas mft education requirements can help future therapists plan their academic pathways. For those considering California, checking the mft requirements in Oakland will ensure you meet local licensure criteria.

Whether you choose a general psychology degree or a pathway towards licensure as an MFT, understanding your region’s requirements is crucial for career success.

Best Scientists Citing Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles