World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs

Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
8084
World Ranking
7515
National Ranking
334

Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 106 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs is affiliated with the University of Twente in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and psychology, with a notable focus on clinical psychology, pharmacology, and applied psychology. Additional subfields include oncology and complementary and alternative medicine.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics such as musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, mindfulness and compassion interventions, and digital mental health interventions. Other areas of study include complementary and alternative medicine studies, cancer survivorship and care, mobile health and mHealth applications, and telemedicine and telehealth implementation.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "A User-Centered Approach to an Evidence-Based Electronic Health Pain Management Intervention for People With Chronic Pain: Design and Development of EPIO" (2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • "Health care providers' experiences of pain management and attitudes towards digitally supported self-management interventions for chronic pain: a qualitative study" (2021, BMC Health Services Research)
  • "Web-based self-help intervention for partners of cancer patients based on acceptance and commitment therapy and self-compassion training: a randomized controlled trial with automated versus personal feedback" (2021, Supportive Care in Cancer)
  • "Digital Self-Management in Support of Patients Living With Chronic Pain: Feasibility Pilot Study" (2020, JMIR Formative Research)
  • "Engaging with EPIO, a digital pain self-management program: a qualitative study" (2022, BMC Health Services Research)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Schreurs include:

  • Elin Børøsund
  • Lise Solberg Nes
  • Cecilie Varsi
  • Hilde Eide
  • Lori B. Waxenberg

Their work has been published repeatedly in several venues, with multiple contributions to the Journal of Medical Internet Research, BMC Health Services Research, JMIR Formative Research, Frontiers in Psychology, and Supportive Care in Cancer.

Best Publications

  • Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    M.M. Veehof;Maarten-Jan Oskam;Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer

  • Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review

    M.M. Veehof;H.R. Trompetter;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs

  • Cut-Off Points for Mild, Moderate, and Severe Pain on the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Variability and Influence of Sex and Catastrophizing.

    Anne M Boonstra;Roy E Stewart;Albère J A Köke;René F A Oosterwijk

  • Internet-based guided self-help intervention for chronic pain based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A randomized controlled trial

    H.R. Trompetter;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;M.M. Veehof;Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy as guided self-help for psychological distress and positive mental health: a randomized controlled trial.

    M. Fledderus;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;Marcel E. Pieterse;Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs

  • Effectiveness of interventions adopting a whole school approach to enhancing social and emotional development: a meta-analysis

    Jochem M. Goldberg;Marcin Sklad;Teuntje R. Elfrink;Karlein M. G. Schreurs

  • Developing Interventions for Chronically Ill Patients: Is Coping a Helpful Concept?

    Denise de Ridder;Karlein Schreurs

  • Integration of coping and social support perspectives: implications for the study of adaptation to chronic diseases.

    Karlein M.G. Schreurs;Denise T.D. de Ridder

  • Measuring values and committed action with the Engaged Living Scale (ELS): Psychometric evaluation in a nonclinical sample and a chronic pain sample

    H.R. Trompetter;Peter M. ten Klooster;Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs;M. Fledderus

  • The role of psychological flexibility in a self-help acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for psychological distress in a randomized controlled trial

    Martine Fledderus;Ernst T. Bohlmeijer;Jean-Paul Fox;Karlein M.G. Schreurs

  • Gender differences in fatigue: biopsychosocial factors relating to fatigue in men and women.

    Jozien M. Bensing;Robert L. Hulsman;Karlein M.G. Schreurs

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy as a web-based intervention for depressive symptoms: randomised controlled trial

    Wendy Theresia Maria Pots;M. Fledderus;Petrus Antonius Maria Meulenbeek;Peter M. ten Klooster

  • Self-efficacy and overprotection are related to quality of life, psychological well-being and self-management in cardiac patients.

    Katherine Joekes;Thérèse Van Elderen;Karlein Schreurs

  • The relative benefits of being optimistic: Optimism as a coping resource in multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease

    Denise de Ridder;Karlein Schreurs;Jozien Bensing

  • Development, content, and process evaluation of a short self-management intervention in patients with chronic diseases requiring self-care behaviours.

    Karlein M.G Schreurs;Vivian T Colland;Roeline G Kuijer;Denise T.D de Ridder

  • Coping, social support and chronic disease: A research agenda

    D. de Ridder;K. Schreurs

  • Psychological flexibility and catastrophizing as associated change mechanisms during online Acceptance & Commitment Therapy for chronic pain.

    Hester R. Trompetter;Ernst T. Bohlmeijer;Jean-Paul Fox;Karlein M.G. Schreurs

  • Compassion-Focused Therapy as Guided Self-Help for Enhancing Public Mental Health : A Randomized Controlled Trial

    M. P. J. Sommers-Spijkerman;H. R. Trompetter;K. M. G. Schreurs;E. T. Bohlmeijer

  • Health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: development and validation of a lupus specific symptom checklist.

    C. Grootscholten;G. Ligtenberg;R.H.W.M. Derksen;K.M.G. Schreurs

  • Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: reciprocal relationships with physical disabilities and depression

    Karlein M.G Schreurs;Denise T.D de Ridder;Jozien M Bensing

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer
Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer University of Twente
Jozien M. Bensing
Jozien M. Bensing Utrecht University
Denise T. D. de Ridder
Denise T. D. de Ridder Utrecht University
Mariët Hagedoorn
Mariët Hagedoorn University Medical Center Groningen
Gianluca Castelnuovo
Gianluca Castelnuovo Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Gerben Johan Westerhof
Gerben Johan Westerhof University of Twente
Bram P. Buunk
Bram P. Buunk University of Groningen
Paul Gilbert
Paul Gilbert University of Derby
Philip Spinhoven
Philip Spinhoven Leiden University
Marc Bijl
Marc Bijl University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in psychology, exploring related online degree options can expand your career opportunities. Many schools offer flexible online psychology programs that cater to working professionals and students with busy schedules. These programs cover a wide range of specializations, including counseling, clinical psychology, and organizational psychology, preparing you for various roles in healthcare, education, human resources, and more.

It's important to choose a program with a reputable curriculum and strong faculty. To guide your research, looking at regional rankings can be very insightful. For example, you can compare the best psychology program rankings in Orlando, explore the top psychology programs in Phoenix, review the best psychology program rankings in Raleigh, or consider the best psychology degree programs ranking in Reno. These resources provide valuable information about program quality, graduation rates, and career support.

Pursuing psychology online gives you flexibility and access to top-tier faculty, helping you gain the skills and knowledge for rewarding careers in mental health, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Karlein Maria Gertrudis Schreurs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles