World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
40
Citations
12716
World Ranking
5195
National Ranking
2454

Sheila T. Murphy publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sheila T. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 111 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Sheila T. Murphy D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sheila T. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sheila T. Murphy is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within the social sciences and health professions, focusing substantially on the intersection of media influence and health behavior.

Their recent publications address various aspects of health communication and behavioral interventions, highlighting topics such as vaccine coverage, psychological perspectives, and technology adoption. Notable recent papers include:

  • Testing the Effectiveness of Message Framing and Episodic Future Thinking in Promoting HPV Vaccination via Anticipated Regret (2020, Health Communication)
  • Comparing "Individual Health" Message Framing to "Organizational Efficiency" Message Framing to Encourage Adoption of Wearable Health Technologies at Work (2020, American Journal of Health Promotion)
  • A Culturally Tailored Narrative Decreased Resistance to COVID-19 Vaccination Among Latinas (2022, American Journal of Health Promotion)
  • Community-Based Public Health Vaccination Campaign (VaccinateLA) in Los Angeles' Black and Latino Communities: Protocol for a Participatory Study (2023, JMIR Research Protocols)
  • Can Narratives Increase Compliance? (2021, Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications)

Murphy's frequent coauthors include Ashley Phelps, Hye Min Kim, eunjin Kim, Jillian K. Kwong, and Ignacio Cruz. This collaborative network suggests engagement across diverse aspects of public health communication and intervention strategies.

Their publications often appear in specialized venues such as the American Journal of Health Promotion, Health Communication, JMIR Research Protocols, Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications, and The International Encyclopedia of Health Communication.

The main fields of study encompassed in Murphy's work are social sciences and health professions, with subfields focusing on sociology and political science, general health professions, literature and literary theory, applied psychology, and broader health issues. The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Media Influence and Health
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts

Murphy's work integrates interdisciplinary approaches to studying communication strategies around health behaviors, emphasizing message framing and narrative techniques to affect health outcomes and technology adoption. This research contributes to understanding how various communication modalities influence public health decisions in diverse populations.

Best Publications

  • Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures.

    Sheila T. Murphy;R. B. Zajonc

  • Ethnicity and Attitudes Toward Patient Autonomy

    Leslie J. Blackhall;Sheila T. Murphy;Gelya Frank;Vicki Michel

  • Narrative versus Nonnarrative: The Role of Identification, Transportation, and Emotion in Reducing Health Disparities

    Sheila T. Murphy;Lauren B. Frank;Joyee S. Chatterjee;Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati

  • Feeling and facial efference: implications of the vascular theory of emotion.

    R. B. Zajonc;Sheila T. Murphy;Marita Inglehart

  • Subliminal Mere Exposure: Specific, General, and Diffuse Effects

    Jennifer L. Monahan;Sheila T. Murphy;R.B. Zajonc

  • Ethnicity and attitudes towards life sustaining technology.

    Leslie J Blackhall;Gelya Frank;Sheila T Murphy;Vicki Michel

  • How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation

    Nathan Walter;Sheila T. Murphy

  • Involved, Transported, or Emotional? Exploring the Determinants of Change in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior in Entertainment Education

    Sheila T. Murphy;Lauren B. Frank;Meghan B. Moran;Paula Patnoe-Woodley

  • Additivity of nonconscious affect: combined effects of priming and exposure.

    Sheila T. Murphy;Jennifer L. Monahan;R. B. Zajonc

  • Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses

    R. B. Zajonc;Pamela K. Adelmann;Sheila T. Murphy;Paula M. Niedenthal

  • Priming Prejudice How Stereotypes and Counter‐Stereotypes Influence Attribution of Responsibility and Credibility among Ingroups and Outgroups

    J. Gerard Power;Sheila T. Murphy;Gail Coover

  • Ethnicity and Advance Care Directives

    Sheila T. Murphy;Joycelynne M. Palmer;Stanley Azen;Gelya Frank

  • Does Entertainment-Education Work With Latinos in the United States? Identification and the Effects of a Telenovela Breast Cancer Storyline

    Holley A. Wilkin;Thomas W. Valente;Sheila Murphy;Michael J. Cody

  • Entertainment-education in a media-saturated environment: examining the impact of single and multiple exposures to breast cancer storylines on two popular medical dramas.

    Heather J Hether;Grace C Huang;Vicki Beck;Sheila T Murphy

  • Telling Stories, Saving Lives: Creating Narrative Health Messages

    Lauren B. Frank;Sheila T. Murphy;Joyee S. Chatterjee;Meghan B. Moran

  • Bioethics in a different tongue: The case of truth-telling

    Leslie J. Blackhall;Gelya Frank;Sheila Murphy;Vicki Michel

  • Predictors of Emergency Preparedness and Compliance.

    Sheila T Murphy;Michael Cody;Lauren B Frank;Deborah Glik

  • It's better to give than to receive: the role of social support, trust, and participation on health-related social networking sites.

    Heather J Hether;Sheila T Murphy;Thomas W Valente

  • More than a Media Moment: The Influence of Televised Storylines on Viewers’ Attitudes toward Transgender People and Policies

    Traci K. Gillig;Erica L. Rosenthal;Sheila T. Murphy;Kate Langrall Folb

  • A Discourse of Relationships in Bioethics: Patient Autonomy and End‐of‐Life Decision Making among Elderly Korean Americans

    Gelya Frank;Leslie J. Blackhall;Vicki Michel;Sheila T. Murphy

  • Comparing the Relative Efficacy of Narrative vs Nonnarrative Health Messages in Reducing Health Disparities Using a Randomized Trial

    Sheila T. Murphy;Lauren B. Frank;Joyee S. Chatterjee;Meghan B. Moran

  • Inference Under the Influence: The Impact of Alcohol and Inhibition Conflict on Women's Sexual Decision Making

    Sheila T. Murphy;Jennifer L. Monahan;Lynn C. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati
Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati University of Southern California
Lynn C. Miller
Lynn C. Miller University of Southern California
Sandra J. Ball-Rokeach
Sandra J. Ball-Rokeach University of Southern California
Thomas W. Valente
Thomas W. Valente University of Southern California
Stanley P. Azen
Stanley P. Azen University of Southern California
Gary Marks
Gary Marks Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Robert B. Zajonc
Robert B. Zajonc Stanford University
Nicole Crepaz
Nicole Crepaz Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Michael J. Cody
Michael J. Cody University of Southern California
Deborah C. Glik
Deborah C. Glik University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities studies in the USA is now more flexible than ever, thanks to online education. For those seeking advanced qualifications on an efficient timeline, a masters degree online can be completed in as little as one year from an accredited university. These programs can enhance your expertise and open doors to roles in research, teaching, or policy analysis.

Students who want to kickstart their careers quickly may opt for an accelerated bachelor's degree online, which allows for a fast-tracked undergraduate experience without sacrificing quality. Many working professionals also choose specialized fields—such as social work or behavioral analysis—due to consistently high demand and strong job growth.

If you are interested in social welfare, msw programs online (Master of Social Work) prepare you for licensure and impactful roles in clinical or community settings. Those passionate about behavioral sciences may consider bcba certification programs online (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) to work in education, therapy, or specialized support.

Online degree options like these can accelerate your academic journey and broaden your career opportunities in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Sheila T. Murphy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles