World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
8343
World Ranking
8756
National Ranking
4657

Michael J. Cody publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Cody sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 66 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael J. Cody D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Cody sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Cody is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical sciences with an emphasis on genetics, epidemiology, and hematology.

Their work spans several topics, including:

  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Microscopic Colitis
  • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders
  • Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment

Michael J. Cody has contributed to publications in notable venues, including:

  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Blood

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Cody include:

  • "S1038 A Pooled Analysis of Early and Sustained Response in Patients With IBD With Iron Deficiency Anemia Who Were Treated With Ferric Maltol," published in 2022 in The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • "Iron Uptake from Ferric Maltol in Patients with Iron Deficiency with or without Anemia: Post Hoc analysis of a Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase 1 Clinical Study," published in 2023 in Blood

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Carsten Schmidt
  • José Menoyo
  • Jackie Mitchell
  • Ann Yellowlees
  • Stefanie Howaldt

Best Publications

  • Serious games : mechanisms and effects

    Ute Ritterfeld;Michael J. Cody;Peter Vorderer

  • Entertainment-education and social change : history, research, and practice

    Arvind Singhal;Michael J. Cody;Everett M. Rogers;Miguel Sabido

  • The Management of Failure Events: Some Contextual Determinants of Accounting Behavior

    Margaret L. McLAUGHUN;Michael J. Cody;H. Dan O'hair

  • Silver surfers: Training and evaluating internet use among older adult learners

    Michael J. Cody;Deborah Dunn;Shari Hoppin;Pamela Wendt

  • The Power of Narratives: The Effect of Entertainment Television Organ Donation Storylines on the Attitudes, Knowledge, and Behaviors of Donors and Nondonors

    Susan E. Morgan;Lauren Movius;Michael J. Cody

  • Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits

    Jeffrey A. Hall;Namkee Park;Hayeon Song;Michael J. Cody

  • Interpersonal Communication: A Goals-Based Approach

    Daniel J. Canary;Michael J. Cody;Valerie Lynn Manusov

  • Goal Types, Gender, and Locus of Control in Managing Interpersonal Conflict.

    Daniel J. Canary;Ellen M. Cunningham;Michael J. Cody

  • Perceptions of compliance‐gaining situations: A dimensional analysis

    Michael J. Cody;Margaret L. McLaughlin

  • Does Entertainment-Education Work With Latinos in the United States? Identification and the Effects of a Telenovela Breast Cancer Storyline

    Holley A. Wilkin;Thomas W. Valente;Sheila Murphy;Michael J. Cody

  • Situational Influences on the Selection of Strategies to Resist Compliance-Gaining Attempts.

    Margaret L. McLAUGHLIN;Michael J. Cody;Carl S. Robey

  • Health-Seeking Behaviors of Elderly Chinese Americans: Shifts in Expectations

    Elaine C. Pang;Maryalice Jordan-Marsh;Merril Silverstein;Michael Cody

  • AWKWARD SILENCES: BEHAVIORAL ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONVERSATIONAL LAPSE

    Margaret L. McLaughlin;Michael J. Cody

  • A typology of disengagement strategies and an examination of the role intimacy, reactions to inequity and relational problems play in strategy selection

    Michael J. Cody

  • A multidimensional scaling of three sets of compliance‐gaining strategies

    Michael J. Cody;Margaret L. McLaughlin;William J. Jordan

  • Compliance-gaining goals: An inductive analysis of actors' goal types, strategies, and successes.

    Michael J. Cody;Daniel J. Canary;Sandi W. Smith

  • Account sequences in conversations between strangers

    Margaret L. McLaughlin;Michael J. Cody;Nancy E. Rosenstein

  • Prepared lies, spontaneous lies, Machiavellianism, and nonverbal communication

    Henry D. O'hair;Michael J. Cody;Margaret L. McLAUGHLIN

  • PLANNING AND CONTROL OF BEHAVIOR DURING DECEPTION

    John O. Greene;H. Dan O'hair;Michael J. Cody;Catherine Yen

  • The psychology of tactical communication.

    Michael J. Cody;Margaret L. McLaughlin

Frequent Co-Authors

Merril Silverstein
Merril Silverstein Syracuse University
Daniel J. Canary
Daniel J. Canary University of Utah
Sheila T. Murphy
Sheila T. Murphy University of Southern California
Peter Vorderer
Peter Vorderer University of Mannheim
Everett M. Rogers
Everett M. Rogers University of New Mexico
Wei Peng
Wei Peng Michigan State University
George A. Barnett
George A. Barnett University of California, Davis
Arvind Singhal
Arvind Singhal The University of Texas at El Paso
Thomas W. Valente
Thomas W. Valente University of Southern California
Sandra J. Ball-Rokeach
Sandra J. Ball-Rokeach University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a variety of career pathways in areas like counseling, therapy, and mental health services. As demand for qualified professionals increases, many students are considering flexible, accredited online programs to get started or advance in their field.

When choosing a program, factors such as accreditation, licensure requirements, and state-specific regulations should be carefully considered. Prospective students can benefit from examining regional options, like the Mississippi counseling degree programs or looking into the best counseling program rankings in Nashville for programs that match their career goals.

Other regions also offer strong pathways. Students may want to review the best counseling program rankings in the Northeast to compare academic and clinical strengths or explore the top counseling degree programs in New York for opportunities in a major metropolitan area.

Whether pursuing a bachelor’s or master’s degree online, carefully comparing program rankings and regional offerings can support your long-term career success in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Cody

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles