World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 60 3539 3261 1994 1796 188 13578

Timothy R. Levine publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Timothy R. Levine between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Timothy R. Levine published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2010. 12 of the 212 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2010. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 7 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 7 publications
1988 2025

212 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Timothy R. Levine: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 4
1991 2
1992 3
1993 3
1994 2
1995 1
1996 7
1997 2
1998 2
1999 3
2000 3
2001 4
2002 9
2003 4
2004 4
2005 5
2006 7
2007 7
2008 6
2009 11
2010 17
2011 7
2012 10
2013 7
2014 12
2015 9
2016 2
2017 6
2018 7
2019 8
2020 3
2021 10
2022 4
2023 8
2024 5
2025 7
Total 212
Download as CSV

Timothy R. Levine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy R. Levine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 188 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 188
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Timothy R. Levine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy R. Levine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 60
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Timothy R. Levine is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with particular attention to subfields such as social psychology, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main areas of study in their work include deception detection and forensic psychology, psychopathy and forensic psychiatry, misinformation and its impacts, adversarial robustness in machine learning, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, personality traits, and social and intergroup psychology.

Levine has contributed to multiple publication venues, frequently publishing in:

  • Human Communication Research
  • Communication Studies
  • Communication Research Reports
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • PLoS ONE

Recent papers by Levine include:

  • "Unpacking variation in lie prevalence: Prolific liars, bad lie days, or both?" (2021) in Communication Monographs
  • "The Number of Senders and Total Judgments Matter More Than Sample Size in Deception-Detection Experiments" (2021) in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Truth-default theory and the psychology of lying and deception detection" (2022) in Current Opinion in Psychology
  • "It's the Situation and Your Disposition: A Test of Two Honesty Hypotheses" (2020) in Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • "A few prolific liars in Japan: Replication and the effects of Dark Triad personality traits" (2021) in PLoS ONE

Levine's frequent co-authors include:

  • Kim B. Serota
  • David M. Markowitz
  • Tony Docan-Morgan
  • Alivia Moore
  • Yasuhiro Daiku

Best Publications

  • Eta Squared, Partial Eta Squared, and Misreporting of Effect Size in Communication Research

    Timothy R. Levine;Craig R. Hullett

  • Truth-Default Theory (TDT) A Theory of Human Deception and Deception Detection

    Timothy R. Levine

  • Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “veracity effect”

    Timothy R. Levine;Hee Sun Park;Steven A. McCornack

  • The Prevalence of Lying in America: Three Studies of Self-Reported Lies

    Kim B. Serota;Timothy R. Levine;Franklin J. Boster

  • Negotiating a Friends with Benefits Relationship

    Melissa A. Bisson;Timothy R. Levine

  • Self‐Construal Scales Lack Validity

    Timothy R. Levine;Mary Jiang Bresnahan;Hee Sun Park;Maria Knight Lapinski

  • How people really detect lies

    Hee Sun Park;Timothy R. Levine;Steven A. McCornack;Kelly Morrison

  • The Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS): reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of relationship closeness.

    Jayson L. Dibble;Timothy R. Levine;Hee Sun Park

  • Measuring trait communication apprehension: A test of rival measurement models of the PRCA‐24

    Timothy R. Levine;James C. Mccroskey

  • When lies are uncovered: Emotional and relational outcomes of discovered deception

    Steven A. McCornack;Timothy R. Levine

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Scale Validation in Communication Research

    Timothy R. Levine

  • When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception

    Steven A. McCornack;Timothy R. Levine

  • The Effects of Argument Quality and Involvement Type on Attitude Formation and Attitude Change: A Test of Dual-Process and Social Judgment Predictions

    Hee Sun Park;Timothy R. Levine;Catherine Y. Kingsley Westerman;Tierney Orfgen

  • Content in Context Improves Deception Detection Accuracy

    J. Pete Blair;Timothy R. Levine;Allison S. Shaw

  • Linking Love and Lies: A Formal Test of the Mccornack and Parks Model of Deception Detection

    Timothy R. Levine;Steven A. McCornack

  • A Critical Assessment of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing in Quantitative Communication Research

    Timothy R. Levine;René Weber;Craig Hullett;Hee Sun Park

  • Sample sizes and effect sizes are negatively correlated in meta-analyses: evidence and implications of a publication bias against nonsignificant findings

    Timothy R. Levine;Kelli J. Asada;Chris Carpenter

  • A Few Prolific Liars: Variation in the Prevalence of Lying

    Kim B. Serota;Timothy R. Levine

  • To stay or to leave? the role of attachment styles in communication patterns and potential termination of romantic relationships following discovery of deception

    Su Ahn Jang;Sandi W. Smith;Timothy R. Levine

  • The theory of reasoned action and self‐construal: Evidence from three cultures

    Hee Sun Park;Timothy R. Levine

  • Sender Demeanor: Individual Differences in Sender Believability Have a Powerful Impact on Deception Detection Judgments

    Timothy R. Levine;Kim B. Serota;Kim B. Serota;Hillary Shulman;David D. Clare

Frequent Co-Authors

Hee Sun Park
Hee Sun Park Korea University
Franklin J. Boster
Franklin J. Boster Michigan State University
Maria Knight Lapinski
Maria Knight Lapinski Michigan State University
Mike Allen
Mike Allen University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Elaine Hatfield
Elaine Hatfield University of Hawaii at Manoa
Marc S. Wilson
Marc S. Wilson Victoria University of Wellington
Daniel J. O'Keefe
Daniel J. O'Keefe Northwestern University
Judee K. Burgoon
Judee K. Burgoon University of Arizona
Ross Buck
Ross Buck University of Connecticut
Joseph B. Walther
Joseph B. Walther University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens numerous career opportunities, including roles in counseling, mental health services, education, and organizational development. Many universities across the USA offer specialized online counseling programs that suit a wide range of interests and professional goals.

For students considering a future in counseling, it’s valuable to review best-ranked counseling degree programs in Colorado. These programs are known for thorough academic training and flexible online formats. Similarly, examining the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Florida can help you understand emerging trends and unique curriculum options in the southeast region.

The top-ranked counseling degree programs in Georgia highlight pathways into school counseling, substance abuse counseling, and clinical settings. In the northeast, the most popular counseling degree programs in Massachusetts offer a blend of academic rigor and online flexibility, preparing graduates for the diverse demands of the counseling profession.

By examining different online programs and their specialized pathways, students can align their educational pursuits with specific career objectives in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy R. Levine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles