World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6560 6106 3561 3231 112 12451
Neuroscience 44 7051 6492 3044 2742 112 12373

Christine L. Larson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christine L. Larson between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christine L. Larson published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2021. 19 of the 161 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2021. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 10 publications
1996 2025

161 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christine L. Larson: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 0
1998 5
1999 2
2000 4
2001 1
2002 3
2003 0
2004 2
2005 1
2006 1
2007 4
2008 1
2009 5
2010 3
2011 2
2012 3
2013 4
2014 2
2015 4
2016 4
2017 6
2018 8
2019 9
2020 9
2021 29
2022 13
2023 15
2024 9
2025 10
Total 161
Download as CSV

Christine L. Larson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine L. Larson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 112
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Christine L. Larson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine L. Larson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Christine L. Larson is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields including psychology, medicine, and neuroscience, with a focus on clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, epidemiology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and neurology.

The main areas of study in their work include:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Christine L. Larson has contributed extensively to numerous journals, publishing predominantly in venues such as:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • NeuroImage

Significant recent publications include:

  • "Racial Discrimination is Associated with Acute Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Predicts Future Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Severity in Trauma-Exposed Black Adults in the United States," 2021, Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • "Cortical volume abnormalities in posttraumatic stress disorder: an ENIGMA-psychiatric genomics consortium PTSD workgroup mega-analysis," 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Scoring the Life Events Checklist: Comparison of three scoring methods," 2021, Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • "Amygdala functional connectivity in the acute aftermath of trauma prospectively predicts severity of posttraumatic stress symptoms," 2020, Neurobiology of Stress
  • "Assessment of brain age in posttraumatic stress disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA PTSD and brain age working groups," 2021, Brain and Behavior

Throughout their career, Christine L. Larson has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Terri A. deRoon-Cassini
  • Jacklynn M. Fitzgerald
  • Ashley A. Huggins
  • E. Kate Webb
  • Carissa W. Tomas

Best Publications

  • Dysfunction in the Neural Circuitry of Emotion Regulation--A Possible Prelude to Violence

    Richard J. Davidson;Katherine M. Putnam;Christine L. Larson

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • Anterior cingulate activity as a predictor of degree of treatment response in major depression: evidence from brain electrical tomography analysis.

    Diego Pizzagalli;Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui;Jack B. Nitschke;Terrence R. Oakes

  • Suppression and enhancement of emotional responses to unpleasant pictures

    Daren C. Jackson;Jessica R. Malmstadt;Christine L. Larson;Richard J. Davidson

  • Metabolic rate in the right amygdala predicts negative affect in depressed patients.

    Heather C. Abercrombie;Stacey M. Schaefer;Christine L. Larson;Terrence R. Oakes

  • Functional but not structural subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in melancholia

    D A Pizzagalli;T R Oakes;A S Fox;M K Chung

  • Asymmetric frontal brain activity, cortisol, and behavior associated with fearful temperament in rhesus monkeys.

    Ned H. Kalin;Christine Larson;Steven E. Shelton;Richard J. Davidson

  • Functional coupling of simultaneous electrical and metabolic activity in the human brain

    Terrence R. Oakes;Diego A. Pizzagalli;Andrew M. Hendrick;Katherine A. Horras

  • Brain electrical tomography in depression: the importance of symptom severity, anxiety, and melancholic features.

    Diego A Pizzagalli;Jack B Nitschke;Terrence R Oakes;Andrew M Hendrick

  • Fear is fast in phobic individuals: amygdala activation in response to fear-relevant stimuli.

    Christine L. Larson;Hillary S. Schaefer;Greg J. Siegle;Cory A.B. Jackson

  • The shape of threat: simple geometric forms evoke rapid and sustained capture of attention.

    Christine L. Larson;Joel Aronoff;Jeffrey J. Stearns

  • EEG alpha power and alpha power asymmetry in sleep and wakefulness

    Ruth M. Benca;William H. Obermeyer;Christine L. Larson;Blenda Yun

  • Relations between PET-derived measures of thalamic glucose metabolism and EEG alpha power

    Christine L. Larson;Richard J. Davidson;Heather C. Abercrombie;Robert T. Ward

  • Recognizing threat: A simple geometric shape activates neural circuitry for threat detection

    Christine L. Larson;Joel Aronoff;Issidoros C. Sarinopoulos;David C. Zhu

  • Failure to filter: anxious individuals show inefficient gating of threat from working memory

    Daniel M. Stout;Alexander J. Shackman;Christine L. Larson

  • The interplay of attention and emotion: top-down attention modulates amygdala activation in psychopathy

    Christine L. Larson;Arielle R. Baskin-Sommers;Daniel M. Stout;Nicholas L. Balderston

  • Thalamic metabolic rate predicts EEG alpha power in healthy control subjects but not in depressed patients.

    Kristen A Lindgren;Christine L Larson;Stacey M Schaefer;Heather C Abercrombie

  • Simple geometric shapes are implicitly associated with affective value

    Christine L. Larson;Joel Aronoff;Elizabeth L. Steuer

  • Common and distinct patterns of affective response in dimensions of anxiety and depression.

    Christine L. Larson;Jack B. Nitschke;Richard J. Davidson

  • Temporal stability of the emotion‐modulated startle response

    Christine L. Larson;Dante Ruffalo;Jennifer Y. Nietert;Richard J. Davidson

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Davidson
Richard J. Davidson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Fred J. Helmstetter
Fred J. Helmstetter University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Terrence R. Oakes
Terrence R. Oakes University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ruth M. Benca
Ruth M. Benca University of California, Irvine
Jack B. Nitschke
Jack B. Nitschke University of Wisconsin–Madison
Han-Joo Lee
Han-Joo Lee University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Diego A. Pizzagalli
Diego A. Pizzagalli Harvard University
Christian Schmahl
Christian Schmahl Heidelberg University
Kelly L. Klump
Kelly L. Klump Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying neuroscience, there are many related online degree options and career paths to consider. Students often explore fields like psychology, social work, clinical therapy, and counseling, each offering unique opportunities and flexible program formats.

For those seeking an affordable foundation in behavioral science, an online psychology degree provides a solid entry point into neuroscience and mental health careers. If you’re interested in helping individuals, families, or communities through social work, check out the easiest social work programs to get into, which can help streamline your pathway into this rewarding field.

Aspiring clinical psychologists may consider pursuing one of the top psy d programs available online. Those looking to specialize in therapy and counseling might explore marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by reputable organizations, which help prepare graduates for licensure and specialized practice.

These related programs often share key coursework and professional skills with neuroscience, expanding your career options in healthcare, research, and human services.

Best Scientists Citing Christine L. Larson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles