World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
10870
World Ranking
3035
National Ranking
1724

Gerard E. Bruder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerard E. Bruder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 169 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gerard E. Bruder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerard E. Bruder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gerard E. Bruder is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and specializes primarily in neuroscience. Their research spans several related subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, pharmacology, health, and social psychology.

The scientist has contributed notable work relating to functional brain connectivity and its role in mental health. Their research topics include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Gerard E. Bruder has authored papers published mainly in the journal Biological Psychiatry, along with contributions to Psychological Medicine, Journal of Affective Disorders, Biological Psychology, and UNC Libraries. Key recent papers include:

  • Pretreatment Reward Sensitivity and Frontostriatal Resting-State Functional Connectivity Are Associated With Response to Bupropion After Sertraline Nonresponse (2020) in Biological Psychiatry
  • Exploration of baseline and early changes in neurocognitive characteristics as predictors of treatment response to bupropion, sertraline, and placebo in the EMBARC clinical trial (2020) in Psychological Medicine
  • Predicting Depression Symptoms in Families at Risk for Depression: Interrelations of Posterior EEG Alpha and Religion/Spirituality (2020) in Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Dissociating disorders of depression, anxiety, and their comorbidity with measures of emotional processing: A joint analysis of visual brain potentials and auditory perceptual asymmetries (2021) in Biological Psychology
  • Predicting Depression Symptoms in Families at Risk for Depression: Interactive Roles of Posterior EEG Alpha and Religion/Spirituality (2020) in Biological Psychiatry

Their frequent collaborators include Myrna M. Weissman, Jürgen Kayser, Daniel M. Alschuler, Patricia J. Deldin, and Madhukar H. Trivedi, with whom Bruder has coauthored multiple publications. These collaborations reflect a strong integration of expertise in the domains of neuroscience and mental health research.

Best Publications

  • Families at high and low risk for depression: a 3-generation study.

    Myrna M. Weissman;Priya Wickramaratne;Yoko Nomura;Virginia Warner

  • Regional brain asymmetries in major depression with or without an anxiety disorder: a quantitative electroencephalographic study.

    Gerard E. Bruder;Regan Fong;Craig E. Tenke;Paul Leite

  • Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) Genotypes and Working Memory: Associations with Differing Cognitive Operations

    Gerard E. Bruder;John G. Keilp;John G. Keilp;Haiyan Xu;Marina Shikhman

  • Electroencephalographic Alpha Measures Predict Therapeutic Response to a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressant: Pre- and Post-Treatment Findings

    Gerard E. Bruder;James P. Sedoruk;Jonathan W. Stewart;Patrick J. McGrath

  • Establishing moderators and biosignatures of antidepressant response in clinical care (EMBARC): Rationale and design.

    Madhukar H. Trivedi;Patrick J. McGrath;Maurizio Fava;Ramin V. Parsey

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) to hemifield presentations of emotional stimuli: differences between depressed patients and healthy adults in P3 amplitude and asymmetry.

    Jürgen Kayser;Gerard E Bruder;Craig E Tenke;Jonathan E Stewart

  • Electroencephalographic and perceptual asymmetry differences between responders and nonresponders to an SSRI antidepressant

    Gerard E Bruder;Jonathan W Stewart;Craig E Tenke;Patrick J McGrath

  • Behavioral activation system deficits predict the six-month course of depression.

    Brian R. McFarland;Stewart A. Shankman;Craig E. Tenke;Gerard E. Bruder

  • Right brain, left brain in depressive disorders: Clinical and theoretical implications of behavioral, electrophysiological and neuroimaging findings.

    Gerard E. Bruder;Jonathan W. Stewart;Patrick J. McGrath

  • Cerebral laterality and depression: differences in perceptual asymmetry among diagnostic subtypes.

    Gerard E. Bruder;Frederic M. Quitkin;Jonathan W. Stewart;Candace Martin

  • Electroencephalographic asymmetries in adolescents with major depression: influence of comorbidity with anxiety disorders.

    Lisa M. Kentgen;Craig E. Tenke;Daniel S. Pine;Regan Fong

  • EEG alpha asymmetry as a gender-specific predictor of outcome to acute treatment with different antidepressant medications in the randomized iSPOT-D study

    Martijn Arns;Gerard Bruder;Ulrich Hegerl;Chris Spooner

  • Current Source Density Measures of Electroencephalographic Alpha Predict Antidepressant Treatment Response

    Craig E. Tenke;Jürgen Kayser;Carlye G. Manna;Shiva Fekri

  • Reward sensitivity in depression: A biobehavioral study.

    Stewart A. Shankman;Daniel N. Klein;Craig E. Tenke;Gerard E. Bruder

  • Pretreatment Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex Theta Activity in Relation to Symptom Improvement in Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Diego A. Pizzagalli;Christian A. Webb;Daniel G. Dillon;Craig E. Tenke

  • Emotion recognition deficits as predictors of transition in individuals at clinical high risk for schizophrenia: a neurodevelopmental perspective.

    C. M. Corcoran;J. G. Keilp;J. Kayser;C. Klim

  • Brain event-related potentials to complex tones in depressed patients: relations to perceptual asymmetry and clinical features.

    Gerard E. Bruder;Craig E. Tenke;Jonathan W. Stewart;James P. Towey

  • Electroencephalographic measures of regional hemispheric activity in Offspring at risk for depressive disorders

    Gerard E. Bruder;Craig E. Tenke;Virginia Warner;Yoko Nomura

  • Event-related potentials in depression: Influence of task, stimulus hemifield and clinical features on P3 latency

    Gerard E. Bruder;James P. Towey;Jonathan W. Stewart;David Friedman

  • Psychomotor Slowing as a Predictor of Fluoxetine Nonresponse in Depressed Outpatients

    Bonnie P. Taylor;Gerard E. Bruder;Jonathan W. Stewart;Patrick J. McGrath

  • Personalized prediction of antidepressant v. placebo response: evidence from the EMBARC study.

    Christian A. Webb;Madhukar H. Trivedi;Zachary D. Cohen;Daniel G. Dillon

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig E. Tenke
Craig E. Tenke Columbia University
Jürgen Kayser
Jürgen Kayser Columbia University
Myrna M. Weissman
Myrna M. Weissman Columbia University
Patrick J. McGrath
Patrick J. McGrath Columbia University
Jonathan W. Stewart
Jonathan W. Stewart Columbia University
Frederic M. Quitkin
Frederic M. Quitkin Columbia University
Diego A. Pizzagalli
Diego A. Pizzagalli Harvard University
Maurizio Fava
Maurizio Fava Harvard University
Madhukar H. Trivedi
Madhukar H. Trivedi The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Jack M. Gorman
Jack M. Gorman Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online psychology degree opens doors to a range of career paths, including counseling, research, and therapy. One of the most popular goals for graduates is becoming a licensed therapist, a process that varies by location but often involves obtaining an accredited degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and passing required exams.

For example, the licensed therapist requirements in Norfolk highlight the importance of state-specific licensure rules, while the licensed therapist requirements in Oakland stress the need for ongoing education and practical experience. If you are interested in the central United States, understanding how to become a licensed therapist in Oklahoma City can help you prepare for local regulations. Similarly, those curious about the West may explore the North Las Vegas licensed therapist requirements to discover more about the Nevada licensure process.

By researching these key pathways, you can choose an online degree that aligns with your professional goals and prepares you for the diverse licensing requirements found across the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Gerard E. Bruder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles