World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6928 6458 3755 3414 137 8610

Patricia J. Deldin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patricia J. Deldin between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patricia J. Deldin published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2021. 15 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2021. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 6 publications
1985 2025

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patricia J. Deldin: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 2
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 5
2001 5
2002 3
2003 1
2004 4
2005 4
2006 4
2007 2
2008 1
2009 3
2010 6
2011 4
2012 8
2013 5
2014 5
2015 9
2016 4
2017 8
2018 9
2019 9
2020 7
2021 10
2022 8
2023 6
2024 9
2025 6
Total 152
Download as CSV

Patricia J. Deldin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia J. Deldin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 137
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Patricia J. Deldin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia J. Deldin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Patricia J. Deldin is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. The research conducted spans predominantly the fields of Psychology, Medicine, and Neuroscience, with a notable focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, and pharmacology.

Their work encompasses a range of mental health topics, including:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Melvin G. McInnis (16 collaborations)
  • Ivy F. Tso (8 collaborations)
  • Margo W. Menkes (8 collaborations)
  • Cecilia Votta (7 collaborations)
  • Madhukar H. Trivedi (6 collaborations)

Their publications have appeared regularly in several scientific venues, most notably:

  • Biological Psychiatry (4 publications)
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (3 publications)
  • Mental Health Review Journal (2 publications)
  • Journal of Affective Disorders Reports (2 publications)
  • Journal of American College Health (2 publications)

Representative recent papers include:

  • Pretreatment Reward Sensitivity and Frontostriatal Resting-State Functional Connectivity Are Associated With Response to Bupropion After Sertraline Nonresponse, 2020, Biological Psychiatry
  • Neural Oscillatory Abnormalities During Gaze Processing in Schizophrenia: Evidence of Reduced Theta Phase Consistency and Inter-areal Theta-Gamma Coupling, 2020, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Mood Lifters for Seniors: Development and Evaluation of an Online, Peer-Led Mental Health Program for Older Adults, 2022, Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
  • Cohort Profile Update: The Heinz C. Prechter Longitudinal Study of Bipolar Disorder, 2023, International Journal of Epidemiology
  • Exploration of baseline and early changes in neurocognitive characteristics as predictors of treatment response to bupropion, sertraline, and placebo in the EMBARC clinical trial, 2020, Psychological Medicine

Best Publications

  • Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression

    Marc G. Berman;Ethan Kross;Katherine M. Krpan;Mary K. Askren

  • Depression, rumination and the default network

    Marc G. Berman;Scott Peltier;Derek Evan Nee;Ethan Kross

  • P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli

    Heather M. Gray;Nalini Ambady;William T. Lowenthal;Patricia Deldin

  • Neural evidence for enhanced error detection in major depressive disorder

    Pearl H. Chiu;Patricia J. Deldin

  • Framing effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information

    Irwin P Levin;Richard D Johnson;Craig P Russo;Patricia J Deldin

  • Feeling Blue or Turquoise? Emotional Differentiation in Major Depressive Disorder

    Emre Demiralp;Renee J. Thompson;Jutta Mata;Susanne M. Jaeggi

  • Neuropsychological Differentiation of Depression and Anxiety

    Jennifer Keller;Jack B. Nitschke;Tina Bhargava;Patricia J. Deldin

  • Do somatic markers mediate decisions on the gambling task

    Ian Tomb;Marc Hauser;Patricia Deldin;Alfonso Caramazza

  • "Asking why" from a distance: its cognitive and emotional consequences for people with major depressive disorder.

    Ethan Kross;David Gard;Patricia Deldin;Jessica Clifton

  • A preliminary investigation of cognitive flexibility for emotional information in major depressive disorder and non-psychiatric controls.

    Christen M. Deveney;P. J. Deldin

  • Pretreatment Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex Theta Activity in Relation to Symptom Improvement in Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Diego A. Pizzagalli;Christian A. Webb;Daniel G. Dillon;Craig E. Tenke

  • An everyday activity as a treatment for depression: the benefits of expressive writing for people diagnosed with major depressive disorder.

    Katherine M. Krpan;Ethan Kross;Marc G. Berman;Patricia J. Deldin

  • Right-posterior face processing anomaly in depression.

    Patricia J. Deldin;Jennifer Keller;John A. Gergen;Gregory A. Miller

  • Neural and behavioral effects of interference resolution in depression and rumination

    Marc G. Berman;Derek Evan Nee;Melynda Casement;Hyang Sook Kim

  • Automatic and Strategic Representation of the Self in Major Depression: Trait and State Abnormalities

    Avgusta Y. Shestyuk;Patricia J. Deldin

  • Framing effects in decisions with completely and incompletely described alternatives

    Irwin P. Levin;Richard D. Johnson;Patricia J. Deldin;Laura M. Carstens

  • Personalized prediction of antidepressant v. placebo response: evidence from the EMBARC study.

    Christian A. Webb;Madhukar H. Trivedi;Zachary D. Cohen;Daniel G. Dillon

  • When perceptions defy reality: The relationships between depression and actual and perceived Facebook social support

    Jiyoung Park;David Seungjae Lee;Holly Shablack;Philippe Verduyn;Philippe Verduyn

  • Reduced sustained brain activity during processing of positive emotional stimuli in major depression.

    Avgusta Y. Shestyuk;Patricia J. Deldin;Jordan E. Brand;Christen M. Deveney

  • Stimulus novelty differentially affects attentional allocation in PTSD

    Matthew Kimble;Danny Kaloupek;Milissa Kaufman;Patricia Deldin

Frequent Co-Authors

Melvin G. McInnis
Melvin G. McInnis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Diego A. Pizzagalli
Diego A. Pizzagalli Harvard University
Madhukar H. Trivedi
Madhukar H. Trivedi The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Ethan Kross
Ethan Kross University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christian A. Webb
Christian A. Webb Harvard University
Myrna M. Weissman
Myrna M. Weissman Columbia University
Gerard E. Bruder
Gerard E. Bruder Columbia University
Maurizio Fava
Maurizio Fava Harvard University
John Jonides
John Jonides University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ramin V. Parsey
Ramin V. Parsey Stony Brook University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering a psychology degree in the USA, pursuing a career as a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) is a popular path. Many accredited universities offer online degrees in psychology and counseling, allowing for flexibility while meeting state-specific educational requirements.

It’s important to note that lpc license requirements in Idaho may differ from those in other states, with unique prerequisites for education, examination, and supervised hours. Similarly, individuals interested in becoming licensed should carefully review the lpc license requirements in Illinois as these can impact the path to licensure and future job opportunities.

Prospective counselors in the Midwest will find that Indiana lpc licensure requirements have specific guidelines regarding coursework, supervised practice, and exam protocols. Meanwhile, resources such as this guide on how to get an lpc license in Iowa provide clear steps for those aiming to launch their counseling career in that state.

Understanding these differences is essential for selecting the right online degree program and preparing for a successful counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia J. Deldin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles