World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Scott A. Langenecker

Scott A. Langenecker

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4442 4112 2470 2236 273 9797

Scott A. Langenecker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott A. Langenecker between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott A. Langenecker published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2018. 32 of the 301 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2018. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 32 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 13 publications
1996 2025

301 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott A. Langenecker: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 1
2006 0
2007 5
2008 8
2009 4
2010 5
2011 5
2012 8
2013 10
2014 12
2015 16
2016 20
2017 30
2018 32
2019 21
2020 19
2021 27
2022 15
2023 24
2024 19
2025 13
Total 301
Download as CSV

Scott A. Langenecker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. Langenecker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 273 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 273
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott A. Langenecker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. Langenecker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott A. Langenecker is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research spans across multiple areas in psychology, with a primary focus on mental health and related cognitive processes.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the field of Psychology, with 153 publications. Key subfields of study include Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Social Psychology.

Langenecker's work covers a range of main research topics such as Mental Health Research Topics, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, Digital Mental Health Interventions, and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

The recent papers by Scott A. Langenecker cover diverse topics and have appeared in a variety of journals:

  • Effects of mood and aging on keystroke dynamics metadata and their diurnal patterns in a large open-science sample: A BiAffect iOS study, 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Pandemic-related mental health risk among front line personnel, 2020, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Resting state functional connectivity correlates of rumination and worry in internalizing psychopathologies, 2021, Depression and Anxiety
  • Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet Is Associated with Lower Depressive Symptoms among U.S. Adults, 2022, Nutrients
  • Risk factors for alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette polysubstance use during adolescence and young adulthood: A 7-year longitudinal study of youth at high risk for smoking escalation, 2021, Addictive Behaviors

Among their frequent co-authors are:

  • Katie L. Bessette
  • Olusola Ajilore
  • Brian Farstead
  • Robert C. Welsh
  • Mindy Westlund Schreiner

Best Publications

  • Differences in the Functional Neuroanatomy of Inhibitory Control Across the Adult Life Span

    Kristy A. Nielson;Scott Aaron Langenecker;Hugh Garavan

  • fMRI of healthy older adults during Stroop interference.

    Scott Aaron Langenecker;Kristy A. Nielson;Kristy A. Nielson;Stephen M. Rao

  • Response of the μ-opioid system to social rejection and acceptance

    David T Hsu;Benjamin J Sanford;Kortni K Meyers;Tiffany M Love

  • Face emotion perception and executive functioning deficits in depression

    Scott A. Langenecker;Linas A. Bieliauskas;Lisa J. Rapport;Jon Kar Zubieta

  • It still hurts: altered endogenous opioid activity in the brain during social rejection and acceptance in major depressive disorder.

    David T Hsu;Benjamin J Sanford;Kortni K Meyers;Tiffany M Love

  • Frontal and Limbic Activation During Inhibitory Control Predicts Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder

    Scott A. Langenecker;Susan E. Kennedy;Leslie M. Guidotti;Emily M. Briceno

  • A task to manipulate attentional load, set-shifting, and inhibitory control: convergent validity and test-retest reliability of the Parametric Go/No-Go Test.

    Scott A. Langenecker;Jon Kar Zubieta;Elizabeth A. Young;Huda Akil

  • Predicting Mood Disturbance Severity with Mobile Phone Keystroke Metadata: A BiAffect Digital Phenotyping Study.

    John Zulueta;Andrea Piscitello;Mladen Rasic;Rebecca Easter

  • Association Between Placebo-Activated Neural Systems and Antidepressant Responses: Neurochemistry of Placebo Effects in Major Depression

    Marta Peciña;Amy S.B. Bohnert;Magdalena Sikora;Erich T. Avery

  • Shared white matter alterations across emotional disorders: A voxel-based meta-analysis of fractional anisotropy

    Lisanne Michelle Jenkins;Alyssa Barba;Miranda Campbell;Melissa Lamar

  • Neural activation to monetary reward is associated with amphetamine reward sensitivity

    Natania A Crane;Stephanie M Gorka;Jessica Weafer;Scott A Langenecker

  • Emotion Processing, Major Depression, and Functional Genetic Variation of Neuropeptide Y

    Brian J. Mickey;Zhifeng Zhou;Mary M. Heitzeg;Elizabeth Heinz

  • Identifying a cognitive impairment subgroup in adults with mood disorders.

    Grant L. Iverson;Brian L. Brooks;Brian L. Brooks;Scott A. Langenecker;Allan H. Young

  • Abnormal anterior cingulate cortical activity during emotional n-back task performance distinguishes bipolar from unipolar depressed females.

    M. A. Bertocci;G. M. Bebko;B. C. Mullin;S. A. Langenecker

  • Frontal recruitment during response inhibition in older adults replicated with fMRI.

    Scott Aaron Langenecker;Kristy A. Nielson;Kristy A. Nielson

  • Neural correlates of rumination in adolescents with remitted major depressive disorder and healthy controls

    Katie L. Burkhouse;Rachel H. Jacobs;Amy T. Peters;Olu Ajilore

  • Intermediate: cognitive phenotypes in bipolar disorder.

    Scott A. Langenecker;Erika F.H. Saunders;Allison M. Kade;Michael T. Ransom

  • Targeting Ruminative Thinking in Adolescents at Risk for Depressive Relapse: Rumination-Focused Cognitive Behavior Therapy in a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial with Resting State fMRI

    Rachel H. Jacobs;Edward R. Watkins;Amy T. Peters;Claudia G. Feldhaus

  • DRD2 polymorphisms modulate reward and emotion processing, dopamine neurotransmission and openness to experience

    Marta Peciña;Brian J. Mickey;Tiffany Love;Heng Wang

  • Increased coupling of intrinsic networks in remitted depressed youth predicts rumination and cognitive control.

    Rachel H. Jacobs;Lisanne M. Jenkins;Laura B. Gabriel;Alyssa Barba

  • Decoupling of the amygdala to other salience network regions in adolescent-onset recurrent major depressive disorder

    Rachel Jacobs;A. Barba;J. R. Gowins;Heide Klumpp

Frequent Co-Authors

Jon Kar Zubieta
Jon Kar Zubieta University of Utah
K. Luan Phan
K. Luan Phan The Ohio State University
Melvin G. McInnis
Melvin G. McInnis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jonathan P. Stange
Jonathan P. Stange University of Southern California
Robert C. Welsh
Robert C. Welsh University of Utah
Stewart A. Shankman
Stewart A. Shankman Northwestern University
Linas A. Bieliauskas
Linas A. Bieliauskas University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kristy A. Nielson
Kristy A. Nielson Marquette University
Bruno Giordani
Bruno Giordani University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lisa J. Rapport
Lisa J. Rapport Wayne State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding online degrees and career pathways. Many students pursue specialized credentials to advance their careers as behavioral or mental health professionals, often following region-specific guidelines and licensure requirements.

For example, those interested in working with individuals with behavioral challenges might explore Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) certification. The Wichita bcba education requirements highlight the need for a relevant graduate degree, supervised experience, and passing the BCBA exam. Similarly, examine the process for becoming a bcba in Winston Salem to understand the local nuances of entering this field.

For those drawn to counseling, each state outlines specific pathways. To become a mental health counselor in Albuquerque requires an accredited counseling degree, supervised clinical experience, and state licensure. Additionally, Anaheim mental health counselor certification requirements emphasize core courses, exam completion, and continued education.

Pursuing online degrees in Psychology can provide the flexibility to meet these requirements while preparing you for an impactful career in behavioral or mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Scott A. Langenecker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles