World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5712 5307 3099 2809 206 8857

Stewart A. Shankman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stewart A. Shankman between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stewart A. Shankman published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2025. 46 of the 266 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2025. 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 31 publications
2002 2025

266 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stewart A. Shankman: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 4
2007 1
2008 5
2009 4
2010 3
2011 6
2012 4
2013 12
2014 12
2015 14
2016 18
2017 23
2018 14
2019 13
2020 11
2021 27
2022 23
2023 17
2024 15
2025 31
Total 266
Download as CSV

Stewart A. Shankman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stewart A. Shankman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 206 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 206
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Stewart A. Shankman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stewart A. Shankman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stewart A. Shankman is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on psychology, neuroscience, and medicine. Within these broader fields, Shankman has contributed extensively to areas such as experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, and social psychology.

Shankman's work centers on main topics including mental health research, functional brain connectivity studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, neural and behavioral psychology studies, schizophrenia research and treatment, and psychosomatic disorders and their treatments.

Frequent publication venues for Shankman's work include Biological Psychiatry, where they have published 21 papers, Journal of Psychiatric Research with 5 papers, Journal of Affective Disorders with 4 papers, Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science with 4 papers, and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry with 3 papers.

Recent publications highlight Shankman's ongoing research contributions. These include:

  • Unique longitudinal relationships between symptoms of psychopathology in youth: A cross-lagged panel network analysis in the ABCD study, 2020, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Psychomotor slowing in Schizophrenia: Implications for endophenotype and biomarker development, 2020, Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry
  • The neural signature of psychomotor disturbance in depression, 2023, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Putamen Structure and Function in Familial Risk for Depression: A Multimodal Imaging Study, 2022, Biological Psychiatry
  • Actigraphically measured psychomotor slowing in depression: systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, Psychological Medicine

Shankman has collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors over their career. These frequent co-authors include Vijay A. Mittal, Sebastian Walther, Allison M. Letkiewicz, Carter J. Funkhouser, and Lilian Y. Li.

Best Publications

  • Subthreshold conditions as precursors for full syndrome disorders: a 15-year longitudinal study of multiple diagnostic classes.

    Stewart A. Shankman;Peter M. Lewinsohn;Daniel N. Klein;Jason W. Small

  • The prevalence and co-morbidity of subthreshold psychiatric conditions

    Peter M. Lewinsohn;Stewart A. Shankman;Jeffrey M. Gau;Daniel N. Klein

  • What is the association between obsessive-compulsive disorder and eating disorders?

    Sarah E. Altman;Stewart A. Shankman

  • Ten-year prospective follow-up study of the naturalistic course of dysthymic disorder and double depression.

    Daniel N. Klein;Stewart A. Shankman;Suzanne Rose

  • The relation between depression and anxiety: an evaluation of the tripartite, approach-withdrawal and valence-arousal models.

    Stewart A Shankman;Daniel N Klein

  • Reliability and validity of severity dimensions of psychopathology assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID)

    Stewart A. Shankman;Carter J. Funkhouser;Daniel N. Klein;Joanne Davila

  • Disorder specificity despite comorbidity: Resting EEG alpha asymmetry in major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder

    Andrew Kemp;K Griffiths;Kim Felmingham;Kim Felmingham;Stewart A. Shankman

  • Behavioral activation system deficits predict the six-month course of depression.

    Brian R. McFarland;Stewart A. Shankman;Craig E. Tenke;Gerard E. Bruder

  • Subthreshold Depressive Disorder in Adolescents: Predictors of Escalation to Full-Syndrome Depressive Disorders

    Daniel N. Klein;Stewart A. Shankman;Peter M. Lewinsohn;John R. Seeley

  • A psychophysiological investigation of threat and reward sensitivity in individuals with panic disorder and/or major depressive disorder.

    Stewart A. Shankman;Brady D. Nelson;Casey Sarapas;E. Jenna Robison-Andrew

  • Reward sensitivity in depression: A biobehavioral study.

    Stewart A. Shankman;Daniel N. Klein;Craig E. Tenke;Gerard E. Bruder

  • Shared white matter alterations across emotional disorders: A voxel-based meta-analysis of fractional anisotropy

    Lisanne Michelle Jenkins;Alyssa Barba;Miranda Campbell;Melissa Lamar

  • Does intolerance of uncertainty predict anticipatory startle responses to uncertain threat

    Brady D. Nelson;Stewart A. Shankman

  • Unique longitudinal relationships between symptoms of psychopathology in youth: A cross‐lagged panel network analysis in the ABCD study

    Carter J. Funkhouser;Carter J. Funkhouser;Anjali A. Chacko;Kelly A. Correa;Kelly A. Correa;Ariela J. E. Kaiser;Ariela J. E. Kaiser

  • Family Study of Chronic Depression in a Community Sample of Young Adults

    Daniel N. Klein;Stewart A. Shankman;Peter M. Lewinsohn;Paul Rohde

  • Biomarkers of threat and reward sensitivity demonstrate unique associations with risk for psychopathology.

    Brady D. Nelson;Sarah Kate McGowan;Casey Sarapas;E. Jenna Robison-Andrew

  • Blunted neural response to rewards as a vulnerability factor for depression: Results from a family study.

    Anna Weinberg;Huiting Liu;Greg Hajcak;Stewart A. Shankman

  • Depression and personality.

    Daniel N. Klein;C. Emily Durbin;Stewart A. Shankman;Neil J. Santiago

  • Startle potentiation to uncertain threat as a psychophysiological indicator of fear-based psychopathology: An examination across multiple internalizing disorders.

    Stephanie M. Gorka;Lynne Lieberman;Stewart A. Shankman;K. Luan Phan

  • Dysthymic disorder and double depression: prediction of 10-year course trajectories and outcomes

    Daniel N. Klein;Stewart A. Shankman;Suzanne Rose

  • Intolerance of uncertainty.

    Peter M. McEvoy;R. Nicholas Carleton;Kelly Correa;Stewart A. Shankman

Frequent Co-Authors

K. Luan Phan
K. Luan Phan The Ohio State University
Brady D. Nelson
Brady D. Nelson Stony Brook University
Daniel N. Klein
Daniel N. Klein Stony Brook University
Scott A. Langenecker
Scott A. Langenecker University of Utah
Craig E. Tenke
Craig E. Tenke Columbia University
Anna Weinberg
Anna Weinberg McGill University
John R. Seeley
John R. Seeley University of Oregon
Vijay A. Mittal
Vijay A. Mittal Northwestern University
Thomas M. Olino
Thomas M. Olino Temple University
Peter M. Lewinsohn
Peter M. Lewinsohn Oregon Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens doors to many rewarding online degrees and career pathways, especially in the field of social work. Many states offer unique routes and requirements for becoming a social worker, and understanding these can help you plan your educational journey.

For example, those interested in becoming a social worker in Colorado must complete specific accredited programs and licensure steps. Similarly, Connecticut social work education requirements place emphasis on advanced degrees and supervised experience before obtaining full licensure.

If you plan to work in Delaware, it’s important to review guidelines on how to become a social worker in Delaware, as the state outlines specific educational benchmarks and exam requirements. On the other hand, requirements to be a social worker in Florida include both coursework and practical fieldwork.

By understanding these differences, you can tailor your online psychology studies to meet state-specific standards and advance your career in social work or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Stewart A. Shankman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles