World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
6455
World Ranking
9768
National Ranking
5166

Daniel A. Fitzgerald publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel A. Fitzgerald sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 46 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel A. Fitzgerald D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel A. Fitzgerald sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel A. Fitzgerald is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a focus on research activities within the institution.

Their publication record does not list recent papers, frequent co-authors, or common publication venues, and there is no available information regarding book publications or awards.

No specific main fields of study, subfields, or primary topics of work have been documented, leaving the exact research domains unspecified.

This profile summarizes the available data regarding Daniel A. Fitzgerald's academic presence based on the current records held.

Best Publications

  • Neural substrates for voluntary suppression of negative affect: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    K. Luan Phan;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Pradeep J. Nathan;Gregory J. Moore

  • Amygdala and orbitofrontal reactivity to social threat in individuals with impulsive aggression.

    Emil F. Coccaro;Michael S. McCloskey;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;K. Luan Phan

  • Association between Amygdala Hyperactivity to Harsh Faces and Severity of Social Anxiety in Generalized Social Phobia

    K. Luan Phan;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Pradeep J. Nathan;Manuel E. Tancer

  • Beyond threat: Amygdala reactivity across multiple expressions of facial affect

    Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Mike Angstadt;Laura M. Jelsone;Pradeep J. Nathan

  • Real-time fMRI of temporolimbic regions detects amygdala activation during single-trial self-induced sadness

    Stefan Posse;Daniel Fitzgerald;Kunxiu Gao;Ute Habel

  • Modulation of resting-state amygdala-frontal functional connectivity by oxytocin in generalized social anxiety disorder.

    Sonam Dodhia;Avinash Hosanagar;Daniel A Fitzgerald;Izelle Labuschagne

  • Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla.

    K. Luan Phan;Alvaro Magalhaes;Alvaro Magalhaes;Timothy J. Ziemlewicz;Daniel A. Fitzgerald

  • Oxytocin modulation of amygdala functional connectivity to fearful faces in generalized social anxiety disorder

    Stephanie M. Gorka;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Izelle Labuschagne;Izelle Labuschagne;Avinash Hosanagar

  • Neural predictors and mechanisms of cognitive behavioral therapy on threat processing in social anxiety disorder.

    Heide Klumpp;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;K. Luan Phan;K. Luan Phan

  • Age-related changes in amygdala-frontal connectivity during emotional face processing from childhood into young adulthood.

    Minjie Wu;Autumn Kujawa;Autumn Kujawa;Lisa H. Lu;Lisa H. Lu;Daniel A. Fitzgerald

  • Amygdala reactivity to emotional faces at high and low intensity in generalized social phobia: A 4-Tesla functional MRI study

    K. Lira Yoon;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Mike Angstadt;Rosemary A. McCarron

  • Anterior cingulate neurochemistry in social anxiety disorder: 1H-MRS at 4 Tesla.

    K. Luan Phan;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Bernadette M. Cortese;Navid Seraji-Bozorgzad

  • Neural correlates of internally-generated disgust via autobiographical recall: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation

    Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Stefan Posse;Gregory J. Moore;Manuel E. Tancer

  • Emotion Regulatory Brain Function and SSRI Treatment in PTSD: Neural Correlates and Predictors of Change

    Annmarie MacNamara;Christine A. Rabinak;Amy E. Kennedy;Amy E. Kennedy;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Daniel A. Fitzgerald

  • Neurostructural abnormalities in pediatric anxiety disorders

    Jeffrey R. Strawn;Jeffrey R. Strawn;Lisa Hamm;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Kate D. Fitzgerald

  • Anterior cingulate cortex and insula response during indirect and direct processing of emotional faces in generalized social anxiety disorder

    Heide Klumpp;David Post;Mike Angstadt;Daniel A Fitzgerald

  • Reduced default mode network connectivity following combat trauma.

    Julia A. DiGangi;Armin Tadayyon;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Christine A. Rabinak

  • Anterior insula responds to temporally unpredictable aversiveness: an fMRI study.

    Stewart A. Shankman;Stephanie M. Gorka;Brady D. Nelson;Daniel A. Fitzgerald

  • Neural response during attentional control and emotion processing predicts improvement after cognitive behavioral therapy in generalized social anxiety disorder.

    H. Klumpp;D. A. Fitzgerald;M. Angstadt;D. Post

  • Resting state amygdala-prefrontal connectivity predicts symptom change after cognitive behavioral therapy in generalized social anxiety disorder

    Heide Klumpp;Michael K Keutmann;Daniel A Fitzgerald;Daniel A Fitzgerald;Stewart A Shankman

  • Detection of deception using fMRI: Better than chance, but well below perfection

    George T. Monteleone;K. Luan Phan;Howard C. Nusbaum;Daniel Fitzgerald

Frequent Co-Authors

K. Luan Phan
K. Luan Phan The Ohio State University
Pradeep J. Nathan
Pradeep J. Nathan University of Cambridge
Mike Angstadt
Mike Angstadt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Indira Tendolkar
Indira Tendolkar Radboud University
Anne E. M. Speckens
Anne E. M. Speckens Radboud University
Stewart A. Shankman
Stewart A. Shankman Northwestern University
Eni S. Becker
Eni S. Becker Radboud University
Gregory J. Moore
Gregory J. Moore Stanford University School of Medicine
Guillén Fernández
Guillén Fernández Radboud University
Amanda G. Wood
Amanda G. Wood Deakin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online psychology degree opens doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways, including counseling, research, and mental health services. A popular route is becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), but the journey requires careful attention to educational requirements and state-specific licensure processes.

Each state has unique standards for aspiring counselors. For example, the lpc license requirements in Montana emphasize accredited graduate coursework and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, candidates should carefully review the Nebraska lpc licensure requirements to ensure they meet local benchmarks.

If you’re considering relocating or practicing in other states, research is key. The lpc license requirements in Nevada and lpc license requirements in New Hampshire both address distinct coursework, exam, and clinical supervision prerequisites.

By selecting the right online degree and understanding certification requirements, you can take confident steps toward a fulfilling psychology career across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel A. Fitzgerald

Recently Published Articles