World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
17640
World Ranking
2584
National Ranking
286

Pradeep J. Nathan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pradeep J. Nathan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 246 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Pradeep J. Nathan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pradeep J. Nathan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology
  • 2011 - Member of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology
  • 2009 - Clinical Psychopharmacology Award, British Association for Psychopharmacology
  • 2007 - NARSAD Independent Investigator Award, Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
  • 2006 - Australian Young Tall Poppy Science Award

Overview

Pradeep J. Nathan is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of neuroscience and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with particular emphasis on molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and cognitive neuroscience as subfields.

The scientist's work spans several main topics, including neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, receptor mechanisms and signaling, memory and neural mechanisms, neuropeptides and animal physiology, cholinesterase and neurodegenerative diseases, phosphodiesterase function and regulation, and functional brain connectivity studies.

Recent publications by Pradeep J. Nathan include the following papers:

  • From structure to clinic: Design of a muscarinic M1 receptor agonist with the potential to treat Alzheimer's disease (2021, Cell)
  • Acetylcholine prioritises direct synaptic inputs from entorhinal cortex to CA1 by differential modulation of feedforward inhibitory circuits (2021, Nature Communications)
  • Safety, pharmacokinetics and exploratory pro-cognitive effects of HTL0018318, a selective M1 receptor agonist, in healthy younger adult and elderly subjects: a multiple ascending dose study (2021, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy)
  • First-in-man study to investigate safety, pharmacokinetics and exploratory pharmacodynamics of HTL0018318, a novel M1-receptor partial agonist for the treatment of dementias (2020, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology)
  • Cholinergic muscarinic M1/M4 receptor networks in dementia with Lewy bodies (2020, Brain Communications)

The scientist frequently publishes in the venues OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) at La Trobe University, Nature Communications, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Cell, and Alzheimer's Research & Therapy.

Pradeep J. Nathan collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Alastair Brown
  • Miles Congreve
  • Giles A. Brown
  • David M. Cross
  • Tim Tasker

Best Publications

  • Amygdala–frontal connectivity during emotion regulation

    Sarah J. Banks;Kamryn T. Eddy;Mike Angstadt;Pradeep J. Nathan

  • Neural substrates for voluntary suppression of negative affect: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    K. Luan Phan;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Pradeep J. Nathan;Gregory J. Moore

  • BDNF-based synaptic repair as a disease-modifying strategy for neurodegenerative diseases

    Bai Lu;Guhan Nagappan;Xiaoming Guan;Pradeep J. Nathan;Pradeep J. Nathan

  • Association between Amygdala Hyperactivity to Harsh Faces and Severity of Social Anxiety in Generalized Social Phobia

    K. Luan Phan;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Pradeep J. Nathan;Manuel E. Tancer

  • Oxytocin attenuates amygdala reactivity to fear in generalized social anxiety disorder.

    Izelle Labuschagne;K Luan Phan;Amanda Wood;Mike Angstadt

  • Beyond threat: Amygdala reactivity across multiple expressions of facial affect

    Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Mike Angstadt;Laura M. Jelsone;Pradeep J. Nathan

  • The chronic effects of an extract of Bacopa monniera (Brahmi) on cognitive function in healthy human subjects

    Con Stough;Jenny Lloyd;J. Clarke;L. Downey

  • Cognitive effort drives workspace configuration of human brain functional networks.

    Manfred G. Kitzbichler;Richard N. A. Henson;Marie L. Smith;Pradeep J. Nathan

  • Molecular imaging of the dopaminergic system and its association with human cognitive function.

    Vanessa L Cropley;Vanessa L Cropley;Masahiro Fujita;Robert B Innis;Pradeep Jonathan Nathan

  • Functional Dysconnectivity of Corticostriatal Circuitry as a Risk Phenotype for Psychosis

    Alex Fornito;Ben J. Harrison;Emmeline Goodby;Anna M Dean

  • The neuropharmacology of L-theanine(N-ethyl-L-glutamine): a possible neuroprotective and cognitive enhancing agent.

    Pradeep Jonathan Nathan;Kristy Lu;Marcus Gray;C Oliver

  • Reproducibility of graph metrics of human brain functional networks.

    Lorena Deuker;Edward T. Bullmore;Marie L. Smith;Søren R. Christensen

  • The Acute Effects of L-theanine in Comparison With Alprazolam on Anticipatory Anxiety in Humans

    Kristy Lu;Marcus A. Gray;Chris Oliver;David T. Liley

  • Modulation of resting-state amygdala-frontal functional connectivity by oxytocin in generalized social anxiety disorder.

    Sonam Dodhia;Avinash Hosanagar;Daniel A Fitzgerald;Izelle Labuschagne

  • Gender differences in the cortical electrophysiological processing of visual emotional stimuli

    Andrew H Kemp;R B Silberstein;Stuart M Armstrong;Pradeep Jonathan Nathan

  • Oxytocin enhances resting-state connectivity between amygdala and medial frontal cortex

    Chandra Sekhar Sripada;K. Luan Phan;Izelle Labuschagne;Robert Welsh

  • Neuropsychological changes after 30-day Ginkgo biloba administration in healthy participants.

    Con Stough;Jodi Clarke;Jenny Lloyd;Pradeep Jonathan Nathan

  • Examining the nootropic effects of a special extract of Bacopa monniera on human cognitive functioning: 90 day double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial.

    Con Stough;Luke A Downey;Jenny Lloyd;Beata Silber

  • Hypericum perforatum (St John's Wort): a non-selective reuptake inhibitor? A review of the recent advances in its pharmacology

    Pradeep Jonathan Nathan

  • Muscarinic and nicotinic receptors synergistically modulate working memory and attention in humans.

    Julia Rae Ellis;Kathryn A Ellis;Cali F Bartholomeusz;Ben J Harrison

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward T. Bullmore
Edward T. Bullmore King's College London
Rodney J. Croft
Rodney J. Croft University of Wollongong
K. Luan Phan
K. Luan Phan The Ohio State University
Con Stough
Con Stough Swinburne University of Technology
Ben J. Harrison
Ben J. Harrison University of Melbourne
Richard B. Silberstein
Richard B. Silberstein Swinburne University of Technology
Andrew H. Kemp
Andrew H. Kemp Swansea University
Paul C. Fletcher
Paul C. Fletcher University of Cambridge
Keith Wesnes
Keith Wesnes University of Exeter
Kathryn A. Ellis
Kathryn A. Ellis University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology can open doors to many rewarding careers, including counseling, mental health support, and social work. Online programs provide flexibility for students and professionals alike, making it easier to meet various state licensure requirements if you plan to practice in the USA.

Aspiring social workers should note that each state has specific educational pathways. For example, social worker education requirements in South Carolina typically start with a bachelor's degree in social work (BSW), but advanced roles may require a master's degree. The social worker degree requirements in South Dakota also emphasize accredited degrees and supervised fieldwork to qualify for state licensure.

Similarly, understanding the degree needed to be a social worker in Tennessee or the Texas education requirements for social workers can help guide your career path. Always check local guidelines, as requirements for education, internships, and certification can vary.

Online psychology degrees offer an excellent route to meet these requirements, providing both foundational knowledge and practical experience needed to start a professional journey in social services or mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Pradeep J. Nathan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles