World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 73 1975 1788 80 77 363 18533

Ute Habel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ute Habel between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ute Habel published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 17.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2021. 48 of the 460 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2021. 2000: 8 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 21 publications
2000 2025

460 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ute Habel: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 8
2001 7
2002 3
2003 5
2004 4
2005 5
2006 6
2007 7
2008 13
2009 23
2010 19
2011 16
2012 23
2013 20
2014 15
2015 24
2016 23
2017 24
2018 22
2019 32
2020 25
2021 33
2022 32
2023 23
2024 27
2025 21
Total 460
Download as CSV

Ute Habel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute Habel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–370 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 363 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71 363
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ute Habel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute Habel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 73
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ute Habel is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany. Their research spans across several main fields including Psychology, Neuroscience, and Medicine. Within these disciplines, Habel has contributed extensively to cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, as well as psychiatry and mental health.

Their work addresses diverse topics such as functional brain connectivity studies, neural and behavioral psychology studies, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, mental health research topics, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, and neural dynamics and brain function.

Habel has authored papers published in a number of journals. Recent publications include:

  • Prevalence of depressive symptoms and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder among newly arrived refugees and asylum seekers in Germany: systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, BJPsych Open
  • The Neuroanatomy of Transgender Identity: Mega-Analytic Findings From the ENIGMA Transgender Persons Working Group, 2021, The Journal of Sexual Medicine
  • Endometriosis, psychiatric comorbidities and neuroimaging: Estimating the odds of an endometriosis brain, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
  • High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) for the enhancement of working memory - A systematic review and meta-analysis of healthy adults, 2022, Brain Stimulation
  • Endocrine stress response in pregnancy and 12 weeks postpartum - Exploring risk factors for postpartum depression, 2020, Psychoneuroendocrinology

The frequent publication venues where Habel's research appears include:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Brain Stimulation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry

The scientist collaborates with various coauthors, with the most frequent including:

  • Lisa Wagels
  • Mikhail Votinov
  • Birgit Derntl
  • Carmen Weidler
  • Simon B. Eickhoff

Best Publications

  • Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps

    K. Amunts;O. Kedo;M. Kindler;P. Pieperhoff

  • Neural network of cognitive emotion regulation--an ALE meta-analysis and MACM analysis.

    Nils Kohn;Simon B. Eickhoff;M. Scheller;Angela R. Laird

  • Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: Neural correlates and gender differences.

    Birgit Derntl;Andreas Finkelmeyer;Simon Eickhoff;Simon Eickhoff;Thilo Kellermann

  • Subcortical Correlates of Craving in Recently Abstinent Alcoholic Patients

    Frank Schneider;Ute Habel;Michael Wagner;Petra Franke

  • Brain structure anomalies in autism spectrum disorder--a meta-analysis of VBM studies using anatomic likelihood estimation.

    Thomas Nickl-Jockschat;Ute Habel;Tanja Maria Michel;Janessa Manning

  • Real-time fMRI of temporolimbic regions detects amygdala activation during single-trial self-induced sadness

    Stefan Posse;Daniel Fitzgerald;Kunxiu Gao;Ute Habel

  • Gender differences in the cognitive control of emotion: An fMRI study

    Kathrin Koch;Katharina Pauly;Thilo Kellermann;Nina Y. Seiferth

  • Impairment in the Specificity of Emotion Processing in Schizophrenia

    Frank Schneider;Ruben C. Gur;Kathrin Koch;Volker Backes

  • Generalized deficit in all core components of empathy in schizophrenia.

    Birgit Derntl;Andreas Finkelmeyer;Timur K. Toygar;Anna Hülsmann

  • Same or different? Neural correlates of happy and sad mood in healthy males.

    Ute Habel;T Martina Klein;Thilo Kellermann;N. Jon Shah

  • Gender differences in regional cerebral activity during sadness.

    Frank Schneider;Ute Habel;Christoph Kessler;Jasmin B. Salloum

  • Emotion recognition accuracy in healthy young females is associated with cycle phase.

    Birgit Derntl;Ilse Kryspin-Exner;Eva Fernbach;Ewald Moser

  • The impact of facial emotional expressions on behavioral tendencies in women and men.

    Eva-Maria Seidel;Ute Habel;Michaela Kirschner;Ruben C. Gur

  • Amygdala activity to fear and anger in healthy young males is associated with testosterone

    Birgit Derntl;Christian Windischberger;Simon Robinson;Simon Robinson;Ilse Kryspin-Exner

  • Structural brain abnormalities in psychopaths—a review

    Sabrina Weber;Ute Habel;Katrin Amunts;Frank Schneider M.D.

  • Facial emotion recognition and amygdala activation are associated with menstrual cycle phase.

    Birgit Derntl;Birgit Derntl;Birgit Derntl;Christian Windischberger;Simon Robinson;Simon Robinson;Elisabeth Lamplmayr

  • Functional imaging of conditioned aversive emotional responses in antisocial personality disorder.

    Frank Schneider;Ute Habel;Christoph Kessler;Stefan Posse

  • ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness.

    Danilo Bzdok;Robert Langner;Robert Langner;Svenja Caspers;F Kurth

  • Amygdala activation and facial expressions: explicit emotion discrimination versus implicit emotion processing.

    Ute Habel;Christian Windischberger;Birgit Derntl;Birgit Derntl;Birgit Derntl;Simon Robinson;Simon Robinson

  • Negative bias in fast emotion discrimination in borderline personality disorder.

    M. Dyck;U. Habel;J. Slodczyk;J. Schlummer

  • Predicting delirium after vascular surgery: a model based on pre- and intraoperative data.

    Hinrich Böhner;Thomas C. Hummel;Ute Habel;Caesar Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Schneider
Frank Schneider Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Thilo Kellermann
Thilo Kellermann RWTH Aachen University
Birgit Derntl
Birgit Derntl University of Tübingen
Tilo Kircher
Tilo Kircher Philipp University of Marburg
Simon B. Eickhoff
Simon B. Eickhoff Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Ruben C. Gur
Ruben C. Gur University of Pennsylvania
N. Jon Shah
N. Jon Shah Forschungszentrum Jülich
Ewald Moser
Ewald Moser Medical University of Vienna
Karl Zilles
Karl Zilles Forschungszentrum Jülich
Ilse Kryspin-Exner
Ilse Kryspin-Exner University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up multiple career paths, including opportunities in counseling, social services, and clinical support. As awareness of mental health grows, roles like substance abuse counseling are in high demand throughout the United States. Many students consider online psychology programs for their flexibility and access to specialized tracks.

To become a counselor, specific certification and licensing requirements must be met, which can vary by location. Understanding Laredo substance abuse counselor certification requirements can help prospective counselors navigate the necessary steps in Texas. Similarly, if you are interested in working in Nevada, review the substance abuse counselor requirements in Las Vegas to ensure you meet local standards.

For those considering Kentucky, learning about Lexington substance abuse counselor certification requirements is essential. Nebraska residents should become familiar with the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Lincoln.

No matter your location, carefully reviewing local guidelines and accredited online degree programs is key to starting a rewarding career in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Ute Habel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles