World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 33 930 926 32 32 146 4389
Neuroscience 39 8338 7703 707 672 146 5974

Jonathan Repple publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan Repple between 2015 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan Repple published across 11 years, from 2015 to 2025, averaging 17.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2021. 45 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2015 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2021. 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 4 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 21 publications
2015 2025

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan Repple: publications per year, 2015 to 2025
Year Publications
2015 1
2016 1
2017 4
2018 8
2019 19
2020 18
2021 41
2022 23
2023 30
2024 24
2025 21
Total 190
Download as CSV

Jonathan Repple publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Repple sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 138–147 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 146 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456 146
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan Repple D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Repple sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 39
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Jonathan Repple is affiliated with University Hospital Frankfurt in Germany. Their research spans multiple fields of study, focusing primarily on Medicine, Neuroscience, and Psychology. Within these domains, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's work covers significant topics related to brain function and mental health, including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Mental Health Research Topics, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, Tryptophan and Brain Disorders, Child Abuse and Trauma, and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development.

Jonathan Repple has published numerous papers in well-regarded venues. Frequent publication outlets for their work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Psychological Medicine
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group," 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Genetic variants associated with longitudinal changes in brain structure across the lifespan," 2022, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Quantifying Deviations of Brain Structure and Function in Major Depressive Disorder Across Neuroimaging Modalities," 2022, JAMA Psychiatry
  • "A Systematic Evaluation of Machine Learning-Based Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder," 2024, JAMA Psychiatry
  • "Longitudinal Structural Brain Changes in Bipolar Disorder: A Multicenter Neuroimaging Study of 1232 Individuals by the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group," 2021, Biological Psychiatry

Collaboration forms a key part of Jonathan Repple's research efforts. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Udo Dannlowski
  • Nils Opel
  • Susanne Meinert
  • Dominik Grotegerd
  • Tilo Kircher

Best Publications

  • The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex

    Katrina L. Grasby;Neda Jahanshad;Jodie N. Painter;Lucía Colodro-Conde

  • White matter disturbances in major depressive disorder: a coordinated analysis across 20 international cohorts in the ENIGMA MDD working group

    Laura S. van Velzen;Sinead Kelly;Sinead Kelly;Dmitry Isaev;Andre Aleman

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group

    Laura K.M. Han;Richard Dinga;Richard Dinga;Tim Hahn;Christopher R.K. Ching

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders

    Yash Patel;Nadine Parker;Jean Shin;Derek Howard

  • Widespread white matter microstructural abnormalities in bipolar disorder: evidence from mega- and meta-analyses across 3033 individuals

    Pauline Favre;Pauline Favre;Melissa Pauling;Melissa Pauling;Jacques Stout;Franz Hozer

  • Quantifying Deviations of Brain Structure and Function in Major Depressive Disorder Across Neuroimaging Modalities.

    Unknown

  • Mediation of the influence of childhood maltreatment on depression relapse by cortical structure: a 2-year longitudinal observational study

    Nils Opel;Ronny Redlich;Katharina Dohm;Dario Zaremba

  • Shared vulnerability for connectome alterations across psychiatric and neurological brain disorders.

    Siemon C. de Lange;Lianne H. Scholtens;Leonard H. van den Berg;Marco P. Boks

  • The Limbic System in Youth Depression: Brain Structural and Functional Alterations in Adolescent In-patients with Severe Depression

    Ronny Redlich;Nils Opel;Christian Bürger;Katharina Dohm

  • A Systematic Evaluation of Machine Learning-Based Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder.

    Unknown

  • Longitudinal Structural Brain Changes in Bipolar Disorder: A Multicenter Neuroimaging Study of 1232 Individuals by the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group

    Christoph Abé;Christopher R K Ching;Benny Liberg;Alexander V Lebedev

  • Evolutionary modifications in human brain connectivity associated with schizophrenia

    Martijn P van den Heuvel;Lianne H Scholtens;Siemon C de Lange;Rory Pijnenburg

  • Association of Brain Cortical Changes With Relapse in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

    Dario Zaremba;Katharina Dohm;Ronny Redlich;Dominik Grotegerd

  • Elevated body-mass index is associated with reduced white matter integrity in two large independent cohorts.

    Jonathan Repple;Nils Opel;Susanne Meinert;Ronny Redlich

  • Shared and Specific Patterns of Structural Brain Connectivity Across Affective and Psychotic Disorders

    Unknown

  • In vivo hippocampal subfield volumes in bipolar disorder-A mega-analysis from The Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis Bipolar Disorder Working Group.

    Unn Kristin H. Haukvik;Unn Kristin H. Haukvik;Tiril Pedersen Gurholt;Tiril Pedersen Gurholt;Stener Nerland;Torbjørn Elvsåshagen;Torbjørn Elvsåshagen

  • A voxel-based diffusion tensor imaging study in unipolar and bipolar depression.

    Jonathan Repple;Susanne Meinert;Dominik Grotegerd;Harald Kugel

  • From provocation to aggression: the neural network

    Jonathan Repple;Jonathan Repple;Christina M. Pawliczek;Bianca Voss;Steven Siegel

  • Severity of current depression and remission status are associated with structural connectome alterations in major depressive disorder

    Jonathan Repple;Marco Mauritz;Susanne Meinert;Siemon C de Lange;Siemon C de Lange

  • Brain Correlates of Suicide Attempt in 18,925 Participants Across 18 International Cohorts.

    Adrian I Campos;Paul M Thompson;Dick J Veltman;Elena Pozzi

  • Social anhedonia in major depressive disorder: a symptom-specific neuroimaging approach

    Verena Enneking;Pia Krüssel;Dario Zaremba;Katharina Dohm

  • White matter microstructure mediates the association between physical fitness and cognition in healthy, young adults

    Nils Opel;Stella Martin;Susanne Meinert;Ronny Redlich

  • Brain structural correlates of insomnia severity in 1053 individuals with major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA MDD working group

    Jeanne Leerssen;Jeanne Leerssen;Tessa F. Blanken;Tessa F. Blanken;Elena Pozzi;Neda Jahanshad

  • Sleep duration is associated with white matter microstructure and cognitive performance in healthy adults

    Pascal Grumbach;Nils Opel;Stella Martin;Susanne Meinert

Frequent Co-Authors

Udo Dannlowski
Udo Dannlowski University of Münster
Bernhard T. Baune
Bernhard T. Baune University of Münster
Ronny Redlich
Ronny Redlich University of Münster
Axel Krug
Axel Krug Philipp University of Marburg
Tilo Kircher
Tilo Kircher Philipp University of Marburg
Dominik Grotegerd
Dominik Grotegerd University of Münster
Igor Nenadic
Igor Nenadic Philipp University of Marburg
Andreas Jansen
Andreas Jansen Philipp University of Marburg
Harald Kugel
Harald Kugel University of Münster
Ole A. Andreassen
Ole A. Andreassen Oslo University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a variety of related careers and online degrees. Many students interested in brain science also consider fields like social work, behavioral analysis, and psychology, which offer flexible learning options in the USA.

A popular route is pursuing an msw degree (Master of Social Work), providing skills in counseling and mental health support. For those passionate about faster completion, an accelerated msw program can allow graduates to enter the workforce quickly.

Behavioral science is another compelling area for neuroscience majors. Accredited online bcba programs (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) equip students for specialist roles supporting individuals with behavioral or developmental challenges.

Finally, if you’re seeking a broad understanding of mind and behavior, an online psychology degree offers both flexibility and a strong foundation for many psychology-related careers.

Choosing the right pathway depends on your career goals and how quickly you want to advance in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Repple

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles