World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
6250
World Ranking
8576
National Ranking
857

Anna L. Theakston publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna L. Theakston sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anna L. Theakston D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna L. Theakston sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna L. Theakston is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Arts and Humanities, with a significant focus on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Artificial Intelligence.

Theakston's work addresses various topics within psychology and linguistics, including:

  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Theakston has published multiple papers in peer-reviewed journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Do complement clauses really support false-belief reasoning? A longitudinal study with English-speaking 2- to 3-year-olds," 2021, Developmental Psychology
  • "The Effects of Traffic Air Pollution in and around Schools on Executive Function and Academic Performance in Children: A Rapid Review," 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "The Role of Animacy in Children's Interpretation of Relative Clauses in English: Evidence From Sentence-Picture Matching and Eye Movements," 2020, Cognitive Science
  • "Interactions between givenness and clause order in children's processing of complex sentences," 2020, Cognition
  • "Structural and interactional aspects of adverbial sentences in English mother-child interactions: an analysis of two dense corpora," 2021, Journal of Child Language

Theakston frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Cognition
  • Journal of Child Language
  • Language and Cognition

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Theakston's research practice, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Elena Lieven
  • Silke Brandt
  • Virve-Anneli Vihman
  • Ben Ambridge
  • Katherine E. Twomey

Best Publications

  • The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account.

    Anna L. Theakston;Elena V. M. Lieven;Julian M. Pine;Caroline F. Rowland

  • The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition

    Ben Ambridge;Evan Kidd;Caroline F. Rowland;Anna L. Theakston

  • Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children.

    Ceri Savage;Elena Lieven;Anna L. Theakston;Michael Tomasello

  • Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed-speech preference

    Michael C. Frank;Katherine Jane Alcock;Natalia Arias-Trejo;Gisa Aschersleben

  • A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in english

    Robert J. C. Maslen;Anna L. Theakston;Elena V. M. Lieven;Michael Tomasello

  • The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children's use of referring expressions.

    Danielle Matthews;Elena Lieven;Anna L. Theakston;Michael Tomasello

  • The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order

    Danielle Matthews;Elena Lieven;Anna Theakston;Michael Tomasello

  • Structural Priming as Implicit Learning in Language Acquisition: The Persistence of Lexical and Structural Priming in 4-Year-Olds

    Ceri Savage;Elena Lieven;Anna L. Theakston;Michael Tomasello

  • Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech.

    Caroline F. Rowland;Julian M. Pine;Elena V. M. Lieven;Anna L. Theakston

  • Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax

    Anna L. Theakston;Elena V.M. Lieven;Julian M. Pine;Caroline F. Rowland

  • The distributed learning effect for children's acquisition of an abstract grammatical construction

    Ben Ambridge;Anna L. Theakston;Elena V.M. Lieven;Michael Tomasello

  • The role of entrenchment in children's and adults' performance on grammaticality judgment tasks

    Anna L. Theakston

  • The role of the input in the acquisition of third person singular verbs in English.

    Anna L. Theakston;Elena V. M. Lieven;Michael Tomasello

  • Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb 'go'.

    Anna L. Theakston;Elena V. M. Lieven;Julian M. Pine;Caroline F. Rowland

  • What part of 'no' do children not understand? A usage-based account of multiword negation

    Thea Cameron-Faulkner;Elena Lieven;Anna L. Theakston

  • The Relationship Between Infant Holdout and Gives, and Pointing

    Thea Cameron-Faulkner;Anna Theakston;Elena Lieven;Michael Tomasello

  • Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children's non-subject wh-questions: 'What experimental data can tell us?'.

    Ben Ambridge;Caroline F. Rowland;Anna L. Theakston;Michael Tomasello

  • Can input explain children's me-for-I errors?

    Minna Kirjavainen;Anna L. Theakston;Elena V. Lieven

  • The Incidence of Error in Young Children's Wh-Questions

    Caroline F. Rowland;Julian M. Pine;Elena V. M. Lieven;Anna L. Theakston

  • The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: BE and HAVE

    Anna L. Theakston;Elena V. M. Lieven;Julian M. Pine;Caroline F. Rowland

  • Exploring early communicative behaviours: A fine-grained analysis of infant shows and gives.

    Laura Boundy;Thea Cameron-Faulkner;Anna Theakston

  • Young children's understanding of denial.

    Keith Austin;Anna Theakston;Elena V. M. Lieven;Michael Tomasello

Frequent Co-Authors

Elena Lieven
Elena Lieven University of Manchester
Michael Tomasello
Michael Tomasello Duke University
Caroline F. Rowland
Caroline F. Rowland Radboud University
Julian M. Pine
Julian M. Pine University of Liverpool
Ben Ambridge
Ben Ambridge University of Liverpool
Judith Holler
Judith Holler Max Planck Society
Evan Kidd
Evan Kidd Australian National University
Julie E. Dockrell
Julie E. Dockrell University College London
James Law
James Law Newcastle University
Linda Polka
Linda Polka McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology opens the door to numerous career pathways, especially in counseling and therapy. Many psychology graduates choose to become licensed therapists, but it’s important to understand that each state and city in the U.S. may have its own requirements.

For instance, the licensed therapist requirements in Omaha outline specific educational backgrounds and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, the Orlando licensed therapist education requirements place emphasis on accredited graduate degrees and hands-on practicum hours.

If you plan to practice elsewhere, local regulations may differ. The Philadelphia licensed therapist education requirements highlight the importance of passing specific national exams, while the Phoenix licensed therapist requirements focus on the number of post-graduate supervised hours.

No matter your location, pursuing an online psychology degree is a flexible step toward a rewarding career. Make sure to always check state and city guidelines to ensure your credentials meet local licensure standards.

Best Scientists Citing Anna L. Theakston

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles