World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
11196
World Ranking
8398
National Ranking
4483

Marc E. Fey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc E. Fey sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marc E. Fey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc E. Fey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc E. Fey is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their academic work is connected to this institution, contributing to the research environment and scholarly activities there.

There are no recent papers listed for Marc E. Fey, and no frequent co-authors have been identified from the available data. Additionally, no information is provided regarding frequent publication venues, book publications, or main and subfields of study. The same applies to main topics of research as well as awards, which have not been recorded or disclosed within the current dataset.

Due to the absence of published papers, co-author information, and specific research topics or fields, a detailed overview of their research output or thematic focus is not available at this time. The profile thus remains limited to basic affiliation data without further elaboration on scholarly contributions or academic disciplines.

Best Publications

  • A Longitudinal Investigation of Reading Outcomes in Children with Language Impairments.

    Hugh W. Catts;Marc E. Fey;J. Bruce Tomblin;Xuyang Zhang

  • Language Basis of Reading and Reading Disabilities: Evidence From a Longitudinal Investigation

    Hugh W. Catts;Marc E. Fey;Xuyang Zhang;J. Bruce Tomblin

  • Estimating the Risk of Future Reading Difficulties in Kindergarten Children: A Research-Based Model and Its Clinical Implementation.

    Hugh W. Catts;Marc E. Fey;Xuyang Zhang;J. Bruce Tomblin

  • Language Intervention with Young Children

    Marc E. Fey

  • Differential treatment intensity research: a missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions.

    Steven F. Warren;Marc E. Fey;Paul J. Yoder

  • Subgrouping Poor Readers on the Basis of Individual Differences in Reading-Related Abilities

    Hugh W. Catts;Tiffany P. Hogan;Marc E. Fey

  • Oral and Written Story Composition Skills of Children With Language Impairment

    Marc E. Fey;Hugh W. Catts;Kerry Proctor-Williams;J. Bruce Tomblin

  • Two approaches to the facilitation of grammar in children with language impairment: an experimental evaluation.

    Marc Eugene Fey;Patricia L. Cleave;Steven Harrison Long;Diana Lynn Hughes

  • Profiles of grammatical morphology and sentence imitation in children with specific language impairment and Down syndrome

    P. A. Eadie;M. E. Fey;J. M. Douglas;C. L. Parsons

  • Early Effects of Responsivity Education/Prelinguistic Milieu Teaching for Children With Developmental Delays and Their Parents

    Marc E. Fey;Steven F. Warren;Nancy Brady;Lizbeth H. Finestack

  • Treatment of language disorders in children

    Rebecca Joan McCauley;Marc E. Fey

  • Ten Principles of Grammar Facilitation for Children With Specific Language Impairments

    Marc E. Fey;Steven H. Long;Lizbeth H. Finestack

  • Preparing preschoolers for the academic and social challenges of school.

    Marc E. Fey;Hugh W. Catts;Linda S. Larrivee

  • The Efficacy of Recasts in Language Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Patricia L. Cleave;Stephanie D. Becker;Maura K. Curran;Amanda J. Owen Van Horne

  • Phonological Awareness and Print Knowledge of Preschool Children with Cochlear Implants

    Sophie E. Ambrose;Marc E. Fey;Laurie S. Eisenberg

  • Use of Narrative-Based Language Intervention With Children Who Have Specific Language Impairment

    Lori A. Swanson;Marc E. Fey;Carrie E. Mills;Lynn S. Hood

  • Two models of grammar facilitation in children with language impairments: phase 2.

    Marc E. Fey;Patricia L. Cleave;Steven H. Long

  • Articulation and Phonology

    Marc E. Fey

  • Language intervention : preschool through the elementary years

    Marc E. Fey;Jennifer Windsor;Steven F. Warren

  • Effects of Grammar Facilitation on the Phonological Performance of Children With Speech and Language Impairments

    Marc E. Fey;Patricia L. Cleave;Anna I. Ravida;Steven H. Long

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven F. Warren
Steven F. Warren University of Kansas
Laurence B. Leonard
Laurence B. Leonard Purdue University West Lafayette
Hugh W. Catts
Hugh W. Catts Florida State University
J. Bruce Tomblin
J. Bruce Tomblin University of Iowa
Alan G. Kamhi
Alan G. Kamhi University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Nancy C. Brady
Nancy C. Brady University of Kansas
Jack Gandour
Jack Gandour Purdue University West Lafayette
Jacinta Douglas
Jacinta Douglas La Trobe University
Susan Ellis Weismer
Susan Ellis Weismer University of Wisconsin–Madison
Paul J. Yoder
Paul J. Yoder Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths, especially within the fields of counseling and social work. Psychology graduates often consider pursuing additional qualifications to work as licensed social workers, a role that is regulated at the state level.

For example, students interested in social work must meet specific state requirements. If you plan to practice in Michigan, explore the Michigan social work license requirements to understand the necessary education and licensure steps. Similarly, if your career goals include working in Minnesota, review the Minnesota social work license requirements.

In the South, you should familiarize yourself with the Mississippi social work license requirements if you are considering practicing there. Likewise, aspiring professionals in Missouri can check out the steps on how to become a social worker in Missouri.

Many accredited universities offer online degrees in psychology or social work, providing the flexibility to study while gaining practical experience. Before enrolling, identify your state’s requirements to ensure your degree meets the criteria for your chosen career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Marc E. Fey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles