World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin Gogolla

Martin Gogolla

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
7683
World Ranking
8363
National Ranking
407

Martin Gogolla publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Gogolla sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 331 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Martin Gogolla D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Gogolla sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Gogolla is affiliated with the University of Bremen in Germany. Their research focuses primarily on computer science, with specializations in software, artificial intelligence, and information systems. The main topics of their work encompass model-driven software engineering techniques, advanced software engineering methodologies, and software engineering research, with additional interests in semantic web and ontologies, business process modeling and analysis, web applications and data management, and service-oriented architecture and web services.

Throughout their career, Martin Gogolla has published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek
  • The Journal of Object Technology
  • Media
  • Software & Systems Modeling
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Gogolla cover topics related to runtime monitoring, model snapshots, and semantic properties of OCL operations. Notable publications include:

  • "OCL-based Runtime Monitoring of JVM hosted Applications," 2024, Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek
  • "Exploring (Meta-)Model Snapshots by Combining Visual and Textual Techniques," 2024, Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek
  • "Model Finding in the EMF Ecosystem," 2020, The Journal of Object Technology
  • "Checking the Conformance between Models Based on Scenario Synchronization," 2020, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • "Analyzing Semantic Properties of OCL Operations by Uncovering Interoperational Relationships," 2024, Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek

Martin Gogolla has collaborated frequently with several researchers who appear regularly as coauthors. These include Robert Clarisó, Jordi Cabot, Lars Hamann, Antonio Vallecillo, and Loli Burgueño. Their teamwork has contributed to multiple publications across different venues.

Best Publications

  • USE: A UML-based specification environment for validating UML and OCL

    Martin Gogolla;Fabian Büttner;Mark Richters

  • Object Constraint Language

    Martin Gogolla

  • Model transformations? transformation models!

    Jean Bézivin;Fabian Büttner;Martin Gogolla;Frederic Jouault

  • Validating UML and OCL models in USE by automatic snapshot generation

    Martin Gogolla;Jørn Bohling;Mark Richters

  • On Formalizing the UML Object Constraint Language OCL

    Mark Richters;Martin Gogolla

  • Validating UML models and OCL constraints

    Mark Richters;Martin Gogolla

  • Object constraint language (OCL): a definitive guide

    Jordi Cabot;Martin Gogolla

  • Towards a semantic view of an extended entity-relationship model

    Martin Gogolla;Uwe Hohenstein

  • Conceptual modelling of database applications using an extended ER model

    Gregor Engels;Martin Gogolla;Uwe Hohenstein;Klaus Hülsmann

  • OCL: Syntax, Semantics, and Tools

    Mark Richters;Martin Gogolla

  • Verifying UML/OCL models using Boolean satisfiability

    Mathias Soeken;Robert Wille;Mirco Kuhlmann;Martin Gogolla

  • Using models at runtime to address assurance for self-adaptive systems

    Betty H. C. Cheng;Kerstin I. Eder;Martin Gogolla;Lars Grunske

  • From UML and OCL to relational logic and back

    Mirco Kuhlmann;Martin Gogolla

  • Expressing UML Class Diagrams Properties with OCL

    Martin Gogolla;Mark Richters

  • Extensive validation of OCL models by integrating SAT solving into USE

    Mirco Kuhlmann;Lars Hamann;Martin Gogolla

  • An integrated semantics for UML class, object and state diagrams based on graph transformation

    Sabine Kuske;Martin Gogolla;Ralf Kollmann;Hans-Jörg Kreowski

  • Validation of UML and OCL Models by Automatic Snapshot Generation

    Martin Gogolla;Jörn Bohling;Mark Richters

  • Verification of ATL transformations using transformation models and model finders

    Fabian Büttner;Marina Egea;Jordi Cabot;Martin Gogolla

  • An Extended Entity-Relationship Model: Fundamentals and Pragmatics

    Martin Gogolla

  • A metamodel for OCL

    Mark Richters;Martin Gogolla

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Vallecillo
Antonio Vallecillo University of Malaga
Robert Wille
Robert Wille Technical University of Munich
Patrizio Pelliccione
Patrizio Pelliccione Gran Sasso Science Institute
Bernhard Rumpe
Bernhard Rumpe RWTH Aachen University
Jean Bézivin
Jean Bézivin University of Nantes
Frédéric Jouault
Frédéric Jouault École Supérieure d'Electronique de l'Ouest
Manuel Wimmer
Manuel Wimmer Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Hans-Jörg Kreowski
Hans-Jörg Kreowski University of Bremen
Heinrich Hussmann
Heinrich Hussmann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Rolf Drechsler
Rolf Drechsler University of Bremen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a variety of related fields, especially through online programs. If you are considering expanding your expertise, many institutions offer flexible degree options in areas like engineering and data science.

Understanding the mechanical engineering cost of education is essential, as tuition and fees vary greatly across programs. For those interested in science, a physics degree online combines fundamental theory with practical problem-solving—ideal for careers in technology or research.

The tech industry also has a strong demand for data skills. Earning a data scientist degree online offers affordable pathways to a high-growth field. Electrical engineering remains another popular choice; learn about electrical engineering degree online admissions to find the best programs that fit your career goals.

These online degrees not only provide flexibility but can also lead to diverse and rewarding career pathways closely connected to computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Gogolla

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles