World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
63
Citations
15124
World Ranking
2763
National Ranking
123

Bernhard Rumpe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Rumpe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 628 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bernhard Rumpe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Rumpe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernhard Rumpe is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of Computer Science and Engineering. Their research interests and publications focus predominantly on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Software, Information Systems, and Management Information Systems.

Their scholarly output spans numerous topics, including:

  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Manufacturing Process and Optimization
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services

Bernhard Rumpe has published a significant number of papers in various academic venues. Some of their recent notable papers are:

  • A Computer Science Perspective on Digital Transformation in Production (2022), ACM Transactions on Internet of Things
  • A Cross-Domain Systematic Mapping Study on Software Engineering for Digital Twins (2022), Journal of Systems and Software
  • Generating customized low-code development platforms for digital twins (2022), Journal of Computer Languages
  • Process Prediction with Digital Twins (2021), 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)
  • Process-aware digital twin cockpit synthesis from event logs (2022), Journal of Computer Languages

They have frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Jeff Gray
  • Judith Michael
  • Andreas Wortmann
  • Benoît Combemale
  • Nico Jansen

Bernhard Rumpe's work has been widely published in venues such as:

  • Software & Systems Modeling
  • The Journal of Object Technology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Model-driven Development of Complex Software: A Research Roadmap

    B. Rumpe

  • Meaningful modeling: what's the semantics of "semantics"?

    D. Harel;B. Rumpe

  • The UML as a Formal Modeling Notation

    A. Evans;K. Lano;B. Rumpe

  • Assumptions Underlying Agile Software-Development Processes

    Daniel E. Turk;Bernhard Rumpe

  • Models for digitalization

    Jeff Gray;Bernhard Rumpe

  • Towards a formalization of the Unified Modeling Language

    R. Breu;U. Hinkel;C. Hofmann;C. Klein

  • MontiCore: a framework for compositional development of domain specific languages

    Holger Krahn;Bernhard Rumpe;Steven Völkel

  • A comprehensive approach to privacy in the cloud-based Internet of Things

    Martin Henze;Lars Hermerschmidt;Daniel Kerpen;Roger Häußling

  • Modeling Languages: Syntax, Semantics and All That Stuff, Part I: The Basic Stuff

    D. Harel;B. Rumpe

  • «UML»’99 — The Unified Modeling Language

    Bernhard Rumpe

  • Limitations of Agile Software Processes

    Dan Turk;Bernhard Rumpe

  • The UML profile for framework architectures

    Marcus Fontoura;Wolfgang Pree;Bernhard Rumpe

  • A new skill based robot programming language using UML/P Statecharts

    Ulrike Thomas;Gerd Hirzinger;Bernhard Rumpe;Christoph Schulze

  • Using models at runtime to address assurance for self-adaptive systems

    Betty H. C. Cheng;Kerstin I. Eder;Martin Gogolla;Lars Grunske

  • Caroline: An autonomously driving vehicle for urban environments

    Fred W. Rauskolb;Kai Berger;Christian Lipski;Marcus Magnor

  • Design Guidelines for Domain Specific Languages

    Gabor Karsai;Holger Krahn;Claas Pinkernell;Bernhard Rumpe

  • MontiCore: Modular Development of Textual Domain Specific Languages

    Holger Krahn;Bernhard Rumpe;Steven Völkel

  • Quantitative Survey on Extreme Programming Projects

    Bernhard Rumpe;Astrid Schröder

  • UML-F : A modeling language for object-oriented frameworks

    M. Fontoura;W. Pree;B. Rumpe

  • Autonomous Driving - 5 Years after the Urban Challenge: The Anticipatory Vehicle as a Cyber-Physical System

    Christian Berger;Bernhard Rumpe

  • Developing the UML as a Formal Modelling Notation.

    Andy Evans;Kevin Lano;Bernhard Rumpe

  • Domain specific modeling

    Bernhard Rumpe

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Broy
Manfred Broy Technical University of Munich
Jeff Gray
Jeff Gray University of Alabama
Ina Schaefer
Ina Schaefer Technische Universität Braunschweig
Radu Grosu
Radu Grosu TU Wien
Jean Bézivin
Jean Bézivin University of Nantes
Gabor Karsai
Gabor Karsai Vanderbilt University
Christoph Herrmann
Christoph Herrmann Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Richard F. Paige
Richard F. Paige McMaster University
Andy Schürr
Andy Schürr Technical University of Darmstadt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens many doors, both academically and professionally. If you are considering flexibility or affordability, a variety of online degrees are worth investigating. For example, those seeking advanced education at lower costs can benefit from the cheapest online masters programs in computer and related fields.

Leadership roles in tech often require further study. Ambitious professionals may consider an online phd leadership to prepare for executive and managerial positions. Educators wishing to lead in academic settings may also look at an edd in educational leadership.

For those just starting, an associate degree can provide a fast entry point into tech careers. If you want a quicker route, investigate the easiest associate's degree to get online in IT or allied sectors.

Each of these online pathways offers a unique way to enhance your knowledge, build a strong resume, and expand your career in technology.

Best Scientists Citing Bernhard Rumpe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles