World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
10814
World Ranking
5320
National Ranking
81

Eelco Visser publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eelco Visser sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 225 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Eelco Visser D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eelco Visser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Eelco Visser is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research work centers primarily around computer science, with a focus on several subfields including artificial intelligence, information systems, computational theory and mathematics, software, and hardware and architecture. The breadth of their research spans numerous main topics such as logic, programming, and type systems, model-driven software engineering techniques, parallel computing and optimization techniques, formal methods in verification, security and verification in computing, software engineering research, and distributed systems and fault tolerance.

The scientist has an extensive publication record, featuring important contributions in the following recent papers:

  • Intrinsically-typed definitional interpreters à la carte, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Language-parametric static semantic code completion, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Knowing when to ask: sound scheduling of name resolution in type checkers derived from declarative specifications, 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Intrinsically typed compilation with nameless labels, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Scope States: Guarding Safety of Name Resolution in Parallel Type Checkers, 2021, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

The venues in which these papers have appeared reflect the focus and impact of their work, including:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Software & Systems Modeling
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Frequent collaborators in their research include the following coauthors:

  • Hendrik van Antwerpen
  • Casper Bach Poulsen
  • Arjen Rouvoet
  • Robbert Krebbers
  • Jasper Denkers

Over the course of their career, this scientist has contributed to around 39 publications within computer science, with nearly half related to artificial intelligence, indicating a strong specialization in this area alongside other computational and software engineering topics.

Best Publications

  • The spoofax language workbench: rules for declarative specification of languages and IDEs

    Lennart C.L. Kats;Eelco Visser

  • The ASF+SDF Meta-environment: A Component-Based Language Development Environment

    Mark G. J. van den Brand;Arie van Deursen;Jan Heering;H. A. de Jong

  • The Asf+Sdf Meta-Environment: A Component-Based Language Development Environment

    M.G.J. van den Brand;A. van Deursen;J. Heering;H.A. de Jong

  • Stratego: A Language for Program Transformation Based on Rewriting Strategies System Description of Stratego 0.5

    Eelco Visser

  • Stratego/XT 0.17. A language and toolset for program transformation

    Martin Bravenboer;Karl Trygve Kalleberg;Rob Vermaas;Eelco Visser

  • Program Transformation with Stratego/XT

    Eelco Visser

  • Syntax Definition for Language Prototyping

    E. Visser

  • Stratego: A Language for Program Transformation Based on Rewriting Strategies

    Eelco Visser

  • Program Transformation with Stratego/XT. Rules, Strategies, Tools, and Systems in Stratego/XT 0.9

    Eelco Visser

  • Building program optimizers with rewriting strategies

    Eelco Visser;Zine-el-Abidine Benaissa;Andrew Tolmach

  • Concrete syntax for objects: domain-specific language embedding and assimilation without restrictions

    Martin Bravenboer;Eelco Visser

  • WebDSL: A Case Study in Domain-Specific Language Engineering

    Eelco Visser

  • Disambiguation Filters for Scannerless Generalized LR Parsers

    Mark G. J. van den Brand;Jeroen Scheerder;Jurgen J. Vinju;Eelco Visser

  • Scannerless Generalized-LR Parsing

    E. Visser

  • A Survey of Rewriting Strategies in Program Transformation Systems

    Eelco Visser

  • Meta-programming with Concrete Object Syntax

    Eelco Visser

  • The State of the Art in Language Workbenches. Conclusions from the Language Workbench Challenge

    Sebastian Erdweg;Tijs van der Storm;Tijs van der Storm;Markus Völter;Meinte Boersma

  • Generation of formatters for context-free languages

    Mark van den Brand;Eelco Visser

  • Evaluating and comparing language workbenches

    Sebastian Erdweg;Tijs van der Storm;Markus Völter;Laurence Tratt

  • A survey of strategies in rule-based program transformation systems

    Eelco Visser

Frequent Co-Authors

Joost Visser
Joost Visser Leiden University
Mark van den Brand
Mark van den Brand Eindhoven University of Technology
Klaus Ostermann
Klaus Ostermann University of Tübingen
William R. Cook
William R. Cook The University of Texas at Austin
Christian Kästner
Christian Kästner Carnegie Mellon University
Paul Klint
Paul Klint Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Ralf Lämmel
Ralf Lämmel Facebook (United States)
Arie van Deursen
Arie van Deursen Delft University of Technology
Yannis Smaragdakis
Yannis Smaragdakis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Mira Mezini
Mira Mezini Technical University of Darmstadt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right online degree can greatly impact your computer science career. Many students begin with online associate degree programs in computer science or IT to build foundational skills, then transfer to a four-year institution.

For those aiming to specialize, pursuing one of the most valuable masters degrees in technology or data science can unlock higher-paying roles and leadership opportunities.

Budget is an important factor. Students seeking affordable options can explore cheap online college classes to save money on general education requirements or upskill with new technologies.

If your academic record isn't perfect, don't worry. There are best colleges for low gpa that offer flexible admissions and high-quality online computer science degrees.

Whether you’re just starting or looking to advance, exploring these online pathways can help you find a flexible, reputable, and affordable route into the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Eelco Visser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles