World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
65
Citations
17778
World Ranking
2454
National Ranking
20

Arie van Deursen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arie van Deursen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 293 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Arie van Deursen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arie van Deursen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Arie van Deursen is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research contributions are primarily within the field of Computer Science, where they have published extensively across several subfields, including Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Software, and Signal Processing.

The main topics addressed in their work cover Software Engineering Research, Software System Performance and Reliability, Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, and Topic Modeling.

Van Deursen's recent papers include:

  • AI lifecycle models need to be revised (2021) - Empirical Software Engineering
  • Factors Affecting On-Time Delivery in Large-Scale Agile Software Development (2021) - IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Log-based software monitoring: A systematic mapping study (2021) - Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • Assessing Robustness of ML-Based Program Analysis Tools using Metamorphic Program Transformations (2021) - 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
  • Search-based crash reproduction using behavioural model seeding (2020) - Software Testing Verification and Reliability

Frequent co-authors collaborating with van Deursen include:

  • Luís Cruz
  • Maliheh Izadi
  • Chandra Maddila
  • Ali Al-Kaswan
  • Georgios Gousios

The most common publication venues for van Deursen's work consist of:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

Best Publications

  • Domain-specific languages: an annotated bibliography

    Arie van Deursen;Paul Klint;Joost Visser

  • An exploratory study of the pull-based software development model

    Georgios Gousios;Martin Pinzger;Arie van Deursen

  • The ASF+SDF Meta-environment: A Component-Based Language Development Environment

    Mark G. J. van den Brand;Arie van Deursen;Jan Heering;H. A. de Jong

  • The Asf+Sdf Meta-Environment: A Component-Based Language Development Environment

    M.G.J. van den Brand;A. van Deursen;J. Heering;H.A. de Jong

  • Domain-Specific Language Design Requires Feature Descriptions

    Arie van Deursen;Paul Klint

  • Little languages: little maintenance

    Arie van Deursen;Paul Klint

  • Crawling Ajax-Based Web Applications through Dynamic Analysis of User Interface State Changes

    Ali Mesbah;Arie van Deursen;Stefan Lenselink

  • Refactoring test code

    Arie Deursen;Leon M.F. Moonen;A. Bergh;Gerard Kok

  • Work practices and challenges in pull-based development: the contributor's perspective

    Georgios Gousios;Andy Zaidman;Margaret-Anne Storey;Arie van Deursen

  • Language Prototyping: An Algebraic Specification Approach

    Arie Van Deursen;Jan Heering;Paul Klint

  • Identifying objects using cluster and concept analysis

    Arie van Deursen;Tobias Kuipers

  • Crawling AJAX by Inferring User Interface State Changes

    A. Mesbah;E. Bozdag;A. van Deursen

  • The impact of social media on software engineering practices and tools

    Margaret-Anne Storey;Christoph Treude;Arie van Deursen;Li-Te Cheng

  • Invariant-based automatic testing of AJAX user interfaces

    Ali Mesbah;Arie van Deursen

  • Studying the co-evolution of production and test code in open source and industrial developer test processes through repository mining

    Andy Zaidman;Bart Rompaey;Arie Deursen;Serge Demeyer

  • Invariant-Based Automatic Testing of Modern Web Applications

    A. Mesbah;A. van Deursen;D. Roest

  • An empirical study into class testability

    Magiel Bruntink;Arie van Deursen

  • Understanding Execution Traces Using Massive Sequence and Circular Bundle Views

    B. Cornelissen;D. Holten;A. Zaidman;L. Moonen

  • Predicting class testability using object-oriented metrics

    Unknown

  • On the use of clone detection for identifying crosscutting concern code

    Unknown

  • Communication in open source software development mailing lists

    Anja Guzzi;Alberto Bacchelli;Michele Lanza;Martin Pinzger

  • Symphony: view-driven software architecture reconstruction

    A. van Deursen;C. Hofmeister;R. Koschke;L. Moonen

Frequent Co-Authors

Andy Zaidman
Andy Zaidman Delft University of Technology
Leon Moonen
Leon Moonen Simula Research Laboratory
Joost Visser
Joost Visser Leiden University
Martin Pinzger
Martin Pinzger University of Klagenfurt
Margaret-Anne Storey
Margaret-Anne Storey University of Victoria
Ali Mesbah
Ali Mesbah University of British Columbia
Paul Klint
Paul Klint Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Christoph Treude
Christoph Treude Singapore Management University
Alberto Bacchelli
Alberto Bacchelli University of Zurich
Annibale Panichella
Annibale Panichella Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in expanding your options beyond Computer Science? The rise of affordable and flexible online degree programs now makes it possible to explore related fields without relocating or taking time off work. For example, an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering program can open doors to careers in sustainability and technology-driven environmental solutions.

Engineering is a natural progression for many with a computer science background. You might be curious about the mechanical engineering degree online cost for those who want to blend software and hardware skills. Another scientific pathway is physics. But can you get a physics degree online? The answer is yes, with programs designed for remote learners seeking research or technical careers.

Finally, data science is a fast-growing career area for computer science graduates. If you’re mapping out your future in analytics or AI, consider exploring the recommended data science learning path for affordable online specialization options.

Best Scientists Citing Arie van Deursen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles