World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
8595
World Ranking
8304
National Ranking
138

Joost Visser publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joost Visser sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 169 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Joost Visser D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joost Visser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joost Visser is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their research contributions span primarily the field of Computer Science, with notable focus on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Management Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, and Software.

Their recent scholarly output includes papers published in venues such as ACM Computing Surveys, IEEE conferences, Zenodo, Radboud Repository, and the Journal of Systems and Software. Some of the recent papers are:

  • Adversarial Examples on Object Recognition (2020, ACM Computing Surveys)
  • Adapting Software Architectures to Machine Learning Challenges (2022, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering - SANER)
  • Adoption and Effects of Software Engineering Best Practices in Machine Learning (2020, Zenodo - CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Practices for Engineering Trustworthy Machine Learning Applications (2021, Radboud Repository - Radboud University)
  • Software engineering practices for machine learning - Adoption, effects, and team assessment (2023, Journal of Systems and Software)

Joost Visser has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Alex Serban
  • Koen van der Blom
  • Holger H. Hoos
  • Erik Poll
  • Christoph Johann Stettina

Their publications have appeared frequently in venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 2022 IEEE 28th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation & 31st International Association For Management of Technology Joint Conference
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • ACM Computing Surveys

The primary topics of research covered by Joost Visser include:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications

In addition to journal and conference papers, they have published books with established publishers. One book published through Springer Science+Business Media is titled Quality of Information and Communications Technology (2022).

Best Publications

  • Domain-specific languages: an annotated bibliography

    Arie van Deursen;Paul Klint;Joost Visser

  • The ASF+SDF Meta-environment: A Component-Based Language Development Environment

    Mark G. J. van den Brand;Arie van Deursen;Jan Heering;H. A. de Jong

  • The Asf+Sdf Meta-Environment: A Component-Based Language Development Environment

    M.G.J. van den Brand;A. van Deursen;J. Heering;H.A. de Jong

  • A Practical Model for Measuring Maintainability

    I. Heitlager;T. Kuipers;J. Visser

  • Deriving metric thresholds from benchmark data

    Tiago L. Alves;Christiaan Ypma;Joost Visser

  • An empirical model of technical debt and interest

    Ariadi Nugroho;Joost Visser;Tobias Kuipers

  • Standardized code quality benchmarking for improving software maintainability

    Robert Baggen;José Pedro Correia;Katrin Schill;Joost Visser

  • A Strafunski Application Letter

    Ralf Lämmel;Ralf Lämmel;Joost Visser

  • Generative and transformational techniques in software engineering III

    João M. Fernandes;Ralf Lämmel;Joost Visser;João Alexandre Saraiva

  • Measuring software library stability through historical version analysis

    Steven Raemaekers;Arie van Deursen;Joost Visser

  • Adoption and Effects of Software Engineering Best Practices in Machine Learning

    Alex Serban;Koen van der Blom;Holger Hoos;Joost Visser

  • Semantic Versioning versus Breaking Changes: A Study of the Maven Repository

    Steven Raemaekers;Arie van Deursen;Joost Visser

  • Visitor combination and traversal control

    Joost Visser

  • Adversarial Examples on Object Recognition: A Comprehensive Survey

    Alex Serban;Erik Poll;Joost Visser

  • Test Code Quality and Its Relation to Issue Handling Performance

    Dimitrios Athanasiou;Ariadi Nugroho;Joost Visser;Andy Zaidman

  • Typed Combinators for Generic Traversal

    Ralf Lämmel;Ralf Lämmel;Joost Visser

  • Semantic versioning and impact of breaking changes in the Maven repository

    S. Raemaekers;A. van Deursen;J. Visser

  • From spreadsheets to relational databases and back

    Jácome Cunha;João Saraiva;Joost Visser

  • Generic traversal over typed source code representations

    J.M.W. Visser

  • Quality Assessment for Embedded SQL

    H. van den Brink;R. van der Leek;J. Visser

  • Measuring dependency freshness in software systems

    Joel Cox;Eric Bouwers;Marko van Eekelen;Joost Visser

  • A Practical Model for Measuring Maintainability - a preliminary report -

    Ilja Heitlager;Tobias Kuipers;Joost Visser

Frequent Co-Authors

Arie van Deursen
Arie van Deursen Delft University of Technology
Ralf Lämmel
Ralf Lämmel Facebook (United States)
Eelco Visser
Eelco Visser Delft University of Technology
Paul Klint
Paul Klint Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Andy Zaidman
Andy Zaidman Delft University of Technology
Ben Willem J. Mol
Ben Willem J. Mol Monash University
Leon Moonen
Leon Moonen Simula Research Laboratory
Slinger Jansen
Slinger Jansen Utrecht University
Philippe Kruchten
Philippe Kruchten University of British Columbia
Frank J.M. Broekmans
Frank J.M. Broekmans Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related online programs. In addition to computer science itself, students often consider fields like physics, data science, and electrical engineering due to overlapping skills and career opportunities.

For those seeking flexibility and affordability, there are online physics degrees that provide a solid foundation in analytical and problem-solving skills. Similarly, the growth of big data has led to a surge in demand for specialists, making a data science degree a strong option for students aiming for high-tech roles.

Engineering remains a core pathway, and choosing a program from the online electrical engineering degree ranking can lead to lucrative positions in innovation and design.

If you’re looking for alternative routes, consider certificate programs that pay well. These programs often have faster completion times and practical, job-ready skills that may accelerate your entry into technology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Joost Visser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles