World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frank J.M. Broekmans

Frank J.M. Broekmans

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
39665
World Ranking
10344
National Ranking
409

Frank J.M. Broekmans publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank J.M. Broekmans sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 357 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank J.M. Broekmans D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank J.M. Broekmans sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank J.M. Broekmans is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and has made significant contributions to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on reproductive medicine. Their research encompasses a wide range of topics related to ovarian function, reproductive biology, and assisted reproductive technologies.

Their recent publications include the following works:

  • ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI, 2020, Human Reproduction Open
  • Clinical outcomes of uninterrupted embryo culture with or without time-lapse-based embryo selection versus interrupted standard culture (SelecTIMO): a three-armed, multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, 2023, The Lancet
  • Endometrial scratching in women with one failed IVF/ICSI cycle-outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (SCRaTCH), 2020, Human Reproduction
  • Role of AMH in Prediction of Menopause, 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Erratum: ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI, 2020, Human Reproduction Open

The main publication venues where this scientist frequently publishes include:

  • Human Reproduction
  • Human Reproduction Open
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • Human Reproduction Update
  • Fertility and Sterility

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Frank J.M. Broekmans are:

  • Cornelis B. Lambalk
  • Madelon van Wely
  • Femke Mol
  • Ben W. Mol
  • J Smeenk

Their research covers several subfields within medicine, including:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Immunology

The main topics addressed in their work are:

  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies

Best Publications

  • Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome

    Helena J. Teede;Helena J. Teede;Marie L. Misso;Marie L. Misso;Michael F. Costello;Anuja Dokras

  • A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome

    F J M Broekmans;J Kwee;D J Hendriks;B W Mol

  • Ovarian Aging: Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences

    F. J. Broekmans;M. R. Soules;B. C. Fauser

  • SERUM ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE LEVELS: A NOVEL MEASURE OF OVARIAN RESERVE

    I.A.J. van Rooij;F.J.M. Broekmans;E.R. te Velde;B.C.J.M. Fauser

  • Serum antimüllerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: A longitudinal study

    Ilse A.J. van Rooij;Frank J.M. Broekmans;Gabrielle J. Scheffer;Caspar W.N. Looman

  • The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count

    Simone L. Broer;Ben Willem J. Mol;Dave Hendriks;Frank J.M. Broekmans

  • Anti-Müllerian hormone: ovarian reserve testing and its potential clinical implications.

    Simone L. Broer;Frank J.M. Broekmans;Joop S.E. Laven;Bart C.J.M. Fauser

  • Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Annemieke Kasius;Janine G. Smit;Helen L. Torrance;Marinus J.C. Eijkemans

  • Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels in the Spontaneous Menstrual Cycle Do Not Show Substantial Fluctuation

    Wouter J. K. Hehenkamp;Caspar W. N. Looman;Axel P. N. Themmen;Frank H. de Jong

  • Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve

    László F.J.M.M Bancsi;Frank J.M Broekmans;Marinus J.C Eijkemans;Frank H de Jong

  • PCOS according to the Rotterdam consensus criteria: change in prevalence among WHO‐II anovulation and association with metabolic factors

    F. J. Broekmans;E. A. H. Knauff;O. Valkenburg;J. S. Laven

  • Antral follicle counts by transvaginal ultrasonography are related to age in women with proven natural fertility.

    Gabriëlle J Scheffer;Frank J.M Broekmans;Marinus Dorland;Johannes D.F Habbema

  • AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis

    S L Broer;M Dólleman;B C Opmeer;B C J M Fauser

  • Female reproductive ageing: current knowledge and future trends

    Frank J. Broekmans;Erik A.H. Knauff;Egbert R. te Velde;Nick S. Macklon

  • Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach

    Simone L Broer;Jeroen van Disseldorp;Jeroen van Disseldorp;Kimiko A Broeze;Kimiko A Broeze;Madeleine Dolleman;Madeleine Dolleman

  • Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH): what do we still need to know?

    A. La Marca;F.J. Broekmans;A. Volpe;B.C. Fauser

  • A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial

    Esther M. E. W. Heijnen;Esther M. E. W. Heijnen;Marinus J. C. Eijkemans;Marinus J. C. Eijkemans;Cora De Klerk;Suzanne Polinder

  • Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level.

    Dave J. Hendriks;Ben Willem J. Mol;László F.J.M.M. Bancsi;Egbert R. Te Velde

  • Protocolized versus non-protocolized weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult patients. (Protocol)

    Bronagh Blackwood;Peter O'Halloran;K.E.A. Burns;Fiona Alderdice

  • Corrigendum to The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in women [Hum Reprod Update, 20 (2014) 370-385]

    Didier Dewailly;Claus Yding Andersen;Adam Balen;Frank Broekmans

Frequent Co-Authors

Ben Willem J. Mol
Ben Willem J. Mol Monash University
Bart C.J.M. Fauser
Bart C.J.M. Fauser Utrecht University
Marinus J.C. Eijkemans
Marinus J.C. Eijkemans Utrecht University
Joop S.E. Laven
Joop S.E. Laven Erasmus University Rotterdam
Nick S. Macklon
Nick S. Macklon University of Copenhagen
Yvonne T. van der Schouw
Yvonne T. van der Schouw Utrecht University
Caspar W. N. Looman
Caspar W. N. Looman Erasmus University Rotterdam
Axel P. N. Themmen
Axel P. N. Themmen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Scott M. Nelson
Scott M. Nelson University of Glasgow
Frank H. de Jong
Frank H. de Jong Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in medicine or healthcare but want more flexibility, there are several related online degrees you can pursue. These programs can lead to meaningful roles outside traditional MD or DO pathways, often with faster or more affordable options.

For those interested in mental health care, shortest online pmhnp programs allow registered nurses to become psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners more quickly than traditional routes. This advanced nursing track offers strong job prospects and vital patient care roles.

Students seeking entry-level leadership roles may opt for a bachelors in healthcare administration, which provides the skills to manage health services and facilities. For further advancement, earning a Master of Healthcare Administration is a popular next step. Several institutions offer cheapest mha programs fully online, making a leadership career more accessible.

Experienced nurses aiming for the highest credentials might consider most affordable dnp programs. The Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) is the terminal degree in nursing practice and can be completed online at competitive rates.

These online degrees provide alternative pathways into health care leadership, advanced clinical practice, and administration—expanding your options beyond medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Frank J.M. Broekmans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles