World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
24155
World Ranking
13317
National Ranking
509

Caspar W. N. Looman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caspar W. N. Looman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 287 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Caspar W. N. Looman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caspar W. N. Looman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Caspar W. N. Looman is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their academic profile is primarily associated with this institution.

Details on recent papers, including titles, publication venues, or citation counts, as well as information about frequent co-authors and publication venues, are not available.

There is no available information regarding book publications, main fields of study, subfields of study, or main research topics for Caspar W. N. Looman.

There are no recorded awards or honors associated with this individual.

Best Publications

  • Quantification of clinical morbidity associated with schistosome infection in sub-Saharan Africa.

    Marieke J van der Werf;Sake J de Vlas;Simon Brooker;Caspar W.N Looman

  • Gastric cancer risk in patients with premalignant gastric lesions: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands.

    Annemarie C. de Vries;Nicole C.T. van Grieken;Caspar W.N. Looman;Mariël K. Casparie

  • Serum antimüllerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: A longitudinal study

    Ilse A.J. van Rooij;Frank J.M. Broekmans;Gabrielle J. Scheffer;Caspar W.N. Looman

  • Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels in the Spontaneous Menstrual Cycle Do Not Show Substantial Fluctuation

    Wouter J. K. Hehenkamp;Caspar W. N. Looman;Axel P. N. Themmen;Frank H. de Jong

  • Delaying childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy.

    B.M. van Noord-Zaadstra;C.W.N. Looman;H. Alsbach;J.D.F. Habbema

  • Antral follicle counts by transvaginal ultrasonography are related to age in women with proven natural fertility.

    Gabriëlle J Scheffer;Frank J.M Broekmans;Marinus Dorland;Johannes D.F Habbema

  • Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review.

    Suzie J. Otto;Jacques Fracheboud;Caspar W. N. Looman;Mireille J. M. Broeders

  • Comparison of inter- and intra-cycle variability of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle counts

    J. van Disseldorp;C.B. Lambalk;J. Kwee;C.W.N. Looman

  • Changes in mortality inequalities over two decades: register based study of European countries.

    Johan P Mackenbach;Ivana Kulhánová;Barbara Artnik;Matthias Bopp

  • Anti-müllerian Hormone Is a Promising Predictor for the Occurrence of the Menopausal Transition

    Ilse A.J. van Rooij;Isolde den Tonkelaar;Frank J.M. Broekmans;Caspar W.N. Looman

  • Relationships of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D to bone mineral density and serum parathyroid hormone and markers of bone turnover in older persons.

    Natalia O. Kuchuk;Saskia M. F. Pluijm;Natasja M. van Schoor;Caspar W. N. Looman

  • Risk of malignant progression in patients with Barrett's oesophagus: a Dutch nationwide cohort study

    Pieter J F de Jonge;Mark van Blankenstein;Caspar W N Looman;Mariël K Casparie

  • The number of antral follicles in normal women with proven fertility is the best reflection of reproductive age

    G.J. Scheffer;F.J.M. Broekmans;C.W.N. Looman;M. Blankenstein

  • Does childhood socioeconomic status influence adult health through behavioural factors

    H. Van De Mheen;K. Stronks;C. W. N. Looman;J. P. Mackenbach

  • Functional outcome at 2.5, 5, 9, and 24 months after injury in the Netherlands.

    Suzanne Polinder;Ed F. van Beeck;Marie Louise Essink-Bot;Hidde Toet

  • High cancer risk and increased mortality in patients with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome

    Margot G F van Lier;Anne Marie Westerman;Anja Wagner;Caspar W N Looman

  • Expected poor responders on the basis of an antral follicle count do not benefit from a higher starting dose of gonadotrophins in IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial

    E.R. Klinkert;F.J.M. Broekmans;C.W.N. Looman;J.D.F. Habbema

  • Self-assessed health and mortality: could psychosocial factors explain the association?

    Johan P Mackenbach;Jeanette G Simon;Caspar W N Looman;Inez M A Joung

  • The shape of the relationship between income and self-assessed health: an international study

    Johan P Mackenbach;Pekka Martikainen;Caspar W N Looman;Jetty A A Dalstra

  • The Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Related Colorectal Carcinoma Is Limited: Results From a Nationwide Nested Case–Control Study

    Judith E Baars;Caspar W N Looman;Ewout W Steyerberg;Ruud Beukers

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan P. Mackenbach
Johan P. Mackenbach Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ernst J. Kuipers
Ernst J. Kuipers Nanyang Technological University
J. Dik F. Habbema
J. Dik F. Habbema Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Anton E. Kunst
Anton E. Kunst University of Amsterdam
Frank J.M. Broekmans
Frank J.M. Broekmans Utrecht University
Wilma J. Nusselder
Wilma J. Nusselder Erasmus University Rotterdam
Peter D. Siersema
Peter D. Siersema Radboud University
Marco J. Bruno
Marco J. Bruno Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marie-Louise Essink-Bot
Marie-Louise Essink-Bot University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens many doors, including flexible online learning options. For students considering roles beyond traditional physician tracks, there are numerous accredited online degrees focused on nursing and related healthcare fields. These degrees offer a combination of convenience, affordability, and career advancement opportunities.

If you’re interested in advanced nursing positions, check out the most affordable nurse practitioner programs. For those just getting started, online nursing courses provide a flexible foundation to gain essential credentials.

Experienced nurses can advance to leadership or experimental roles by enrolling in one of the reputable online nursing phd programs. Additionally, registered nurses looking to bolster their qualifications with a bachelor's degree can benefit from the cheapest rn to bsn online programs.

Exploring these related online degrees empowers students to tailor their education for a rewarding healthcare career, no matter where they are on their journey.

Best Scientists Citing Caspar W. N. Looman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles