World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 12938 12177 494 480 420 40518

Gouke J. Bonsel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gouke J. Bonsel between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gouke J. Bonsel published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2009. 12 of the 438 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2009. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications
1989 2025

438 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gouke J. Bonsel: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 4
1991 0
1992 3
1993 6
1994 9
1995 5
1996 6
1997 8
1998 14
1999 7
2000 12
2001 8
2002 11
2003 13
2004 18
2005 18
2006 21
2007 23
2008 26
2009 28
2010 27
2011 22
2012 19
2013 9
2014 15
2015 16
2016 14
2017 8
2018 9
2019 14
2020 7
2021 13
2022 10
2023 2
2024 7
2025 5
Total 438
Download as CSV

Gouke J. Bonsel publications per year - data summary

  • Gouke J. Bonsel, a Medicine scholar from Erasmus University Rotterdam, has 438 publications recorded across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1989 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 28 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1989, with 1 publication.
  • 1 of the 37 years in the span carries no publications at all (1991).
  • The rate of publication averages 11.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.2 per year counting only the 36 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 37 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1989-2001: 83 publications (6.4 per year); 2002-2014: 250 publications (19.2 per year); 2015-2025: 105 publications (9.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Gouke J. Bonsel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gouke J. Bonsel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 420 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 420
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gouke J. Bonsel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Gouke J. Bonsel, a Medicine scholar from Erasmus University Rotterdam, records 420 publications - the 43rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 43% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Gouke J. Bonsel, and about 57% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Gouke J. Bonsel ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Gouke J. Bonsel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gouke J. Bonsel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Gouke J. Bonsel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Gouke J. Bonsel, a Medicine scholar from Erasmus University Rotterdam, records 88 D-Index - the 36th percentile of the discipline.
  • 36% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Gouke J. Bonsel, and about 64% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Gouke J. Bonsel ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Gouke J. Bonsel is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple disciplines, focusing on Medicine as well as Economics, Econometrics, and Finance. The scientist's work includes significant contributions in subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, Surgery, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, and Neurology.

The scientist's research addresses a variety of topics, notably:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Frequent publication venues for Gouke J. Bonsel include:

  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • Quality of Life Research
  • Value in Health
  • Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Pediatric Rheumatology

Several recent papers by Bonsel demonstrate the scope of their research, including:

  • "Estimated Global Proportions of Individuals With Persistent Fatigue, Cognitive, and Respiratory Symptom Clusters Following Symptomatic COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021" (2022) published in JAMA
  • "A global systematic analysis of the occurrence, severity, and recovery pattern of long COVID in 2020 and 2021" (2022) published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Health-related quality of life and mental well-being of healthy and diseased persons in 8 countries: Does stringency of government response against early COVID-19 matter?" (2021) published in SSM - Population Health
  • "A multi-level approach for the use of routinely collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data in healthcare systems" (2021) published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • "Comparing measurement properties of EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L in paediatric patients" (2021) published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Bonsel has collaborated closely with multiple co-authors, including:

  • Juanita A. Haagsma
  • Mathieu F. Janssen
  • Erica I. Lubetkin
  • Suzanne Polinder
  • Joshua M. Bonsel

Best Publications

  • Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

    M Herdman;Claire Gudex;A Lloyd;MF Janssen

  • The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance

    Afina S. Glas;Jeroen G. Lijmer;Martin H. Prins;Gouke J. Bonsel

  • Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests

    Jeroen G. Lijmer;Ben Willem Mol;Siem Heisterkamp;Gouke J. Bonsel

  • A comparison of continuous thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy for suppression of severe tremor

    P.R. Schuurman;D.A. Bosch;P.M.M. Bossuyt;G.J. Bonsel

  • Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D

    Nora Wille;Xavier Badia;Gouke J. Bonsel;Kristina Burström

  • Posttraumatic stress symptoms and health-related quality of life: A two year follow up study of injury treated at the emergency department

    Juanita Antje Haagsma;Suzanne Polinder;Miranda Olff;Hidde Toet

  • Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: Results from a multinational study

    Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer;Nora Wille;Xavier Badia;Gouke Bonsel

  • An Empirical Comparison of Four Generic Health Status Measures: The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA Charts, and The EuroQol Instrument

    Marie-Louise Essink-Bot;Paul F. M. Krabbe;Gouke J. Bonsel;Neil K. Aaronson

  • Higher maternal TSH levels in pregnancy are associated with increased risk for miscarriage, fetal or neonatal death.

    Nadia Benhadi;Wilmar Wiersinga;Johannes Reitsma;Tanja Vrijkotte

  • Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire.

    H. M. E. Van Agt;M.-L. Essink-Bot;P. F. M. Krabbe;G. J. Bonsel

  • Labor and Health Status in Economic Evaluation of Health Care: The Health and Labor Questionnaire

    L. Van Roijen;M.-L. Essink-Bot;M. A. Koopmanschap;G. Bonsel

  • Estimating clinical morbidity due to ischemic heart disease and congestive heart failure: the future rise of heart failure.

    L Bonneux;J J Barendregt;K Meeter;G J Bonsel

  • Disability weights for diseases in the Netherlands

    M.E.A. Stouthard;M.L. Essink-Bot;G.J. Bonsel;J.J.M. Barendregt

  • Probabilistic record linkage is a valid and transparent tool to combine databases without a patient identification number.

    Nora Méray;Johannes B. Reitsma;Anita C.J. Ravelli;Gouke J. Bonsel

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol versus Inhalation Anesthesia with Isoflurane-Nitrous Oxide Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting and Economic Analysis

    Klazina Visser;Elly A. Hassink;Gouke J. Bonsel;Jeroen Moen

  • Effect of screening for red cell antibodies, other than anti-D, to detect hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: a population study in the Netherlands.

    J.M. Koelewijn;T.G.M. Vrijkotte;C.E. Van Der Schoot;G.J. Bonsel

  • Comparing the standard EQ-5D three-level system with a five-level version.

    Mathieu F. Janssen;Erwin Birnie;Juanita A. Haagsma;Gouke J. Bonsel

  • The effect of adding a cognitive dimension to the EuroQol multiattribute health-status classification system.

    Paul F.M. Krabbe;Marlies E.A. Stouthard;Marie-Louise Essink-Bot;Gouke J. Bonsel

  • Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Seven Countries

    Mathieu F. Janssen;Gouke J. Bonsel;Gouke J. Bonsel;Nan Luo

  • Assessing the outcome of pediatric intensive care.

    R.J.B.J. Gemke;A.J. van Vught;G.J. Bonsel

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric A.P. Steegers
Eric A.P. Steegers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marie-Louise Essink-Bot
Marie-Louise Essink-Bot University of Amsterdam
Juanita A. Haagsma
Juanita A. Haagsma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Suzanne Polinder
Suzanne Polinder Erasmus University Rotterdam
Arthur A.M. Wilde
Arthur A.M. Wilde University of Amsterdam
Witte J.G. Hoogendijk
Witte J.G. Hoogendijk Erasmus University Rotterdam
Johannes B. Reitsma
Johannes B. Reitsma Utrecht University
Ben Willem J. Mol
Ben Willem J. Mol Monash University
Paul Kind
Paul Kind University of Leeds
Niek S. Klazinga
Niek S. Klazinga University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens many doors beyond the traditional MD track. Numerous online degrees now offer alternative pathways into healthcare and adjacent professions, making it easier to upskill or redirect your career with flexibility.

For nurses seeking advanced practice roles, asn to np programs provide efficient, online bridge programs to move from an associate’s degree to a nurse practitioner role. Meanwhile, registered nurses looking to enhance their qualifications can consider rn to bsn without clinicals programs, offering flexibility for those needing to balance work and study.

If you are interested in the growing field of nutrition, an online degree in nutrition prepares graduates for roles in health promotion, wellness, and clinical nutrition. Additionally, those drawn to healthcare leadership can consider a cahme-accredited online mha programs to pursue management careers within hospitals or health systems.

Each of these options offers unique advantages for advancing your healthcare career online, with accredited and reputable programs supporting your next professional steps.

Best Scientists Citing Gouke J. Bonsel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles