World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 110 49 41 7 7 633 58182

John Brazier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Brazier between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Brazier published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 17 papers a year. Output peaked at 72 publications in 2014. 13 of the 699 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 72. Peak 72 publications in 2014. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 39 publications 2012: 40 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 72 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 5 publications
1985 2025

699 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Brazier: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 2
1988 2
1989 3
1990 3
1991 4
1992 7
1993 5
1994 6
1995 6
1996 6
1997 2
1998 12
1999 8
2000 8
2001 12
2002 10
2003 8
2004 16
2005 18
2006 23
2007 28
2008 16
2009 28
2010 30
2011 39
2012 40
2013 34
2014 72
2015 25
2016 30
2017 28
2018 22
2019 27
2020 28
2021 28
2022 36
2023 12
2024 8
2025 5
Total 699
Download as CSV

John Brazier publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Brazier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 570+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 633 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100 633
Download as CSV

John Brazier D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Brazier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97 110
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

John Brazier is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several fields, primarily Economics, Econometrics and Finance with a focus on related subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, and intersects with Medicine, particularly General Health Professions.

Their main research areas include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, and Quality of Life. They have also worked extensively on topics involving Economic and Environmental Valuation, Healthcare Policy and Management, Global Health Care Issues, Retinal Diseases and Treatments, Retinal Imaging and Analysis, and Health disparities and outcomes.

John Brazier has contributed to frequent publications in a variety of venues, including:

  • Value in Health
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • PharmacoEconomics
  • Quality of Life Research
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)

Their notable recent papers include:

  • Developing a New Version of the SF-6D Health State Classification System From the SF-36v2: SF-6Dv2, 2020, Medical Care
  • The EQ-HWB: Overview of the Development of a Measure of Health and Wellbeing and Key Results, 2022, Value in Health
  • Vignette-Based Utilities: Usefulness, Limitations, and Methodological Recommendations, 2021, Value in Health
  • Valuing the SF-6Dv2 Classification System in the United Kingdom Using a Discrete-choice Experiment With Duration, 2020, Medical Care
  • Valuation of SF-6Dv2 Health States in China Using Time Trade-off and Discrete-Choice Experiment with a Duration Dimension, 2021, PharmacoEconomics

Collaborations are a significant feature of their work, with frequent co-authors including Donna Rowen, Clara Mukuria, Jill Carlton, Brendan Mulhern, and Jan Henrik Terheyden.

John Brazier is recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

    J. E. Brazier;R. Harper;N. M. B. Jones;A. O'cathain

  • The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36

    John Brazier;Jennifer Roberts;Mark Deverill

  • Cross-Validation of Item Selection and Scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in Nine Countries: Results from the IQOLA Project

    Barbara Gandek;John E. Ware;Neil K. Aaronson;Giovanni Apolone

  • Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?

    Milad Karimi;John Brazier

  • The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12.

    John E Brazier;Jennifer Roberts

  • Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D.

    Stephen J. Walters;John E. Brazier

  • Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation

    John Brazier;J Salomon;Julie Ratcliffe;Aki Tsuchiya

  • A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups.

    John Brazier;Jennifer Roberts;Aki Tsuchiya;Jan Busschbach

  • Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire.

    J. Brazier;N. Jones;P. Kind

  • Deriving a Preference-Based Single Index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey

    John Brazier;Tim Usherwood;Rosemary Harper;Kate Thomas

  • The Factor Structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 Countries: Results from the IQOLA Project

    John E. Ware Jr.;Mark Kosinski;Barbara Gandek;Neil K. Aaronson

  • The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment

    John E. Ware Jr.;Barbara Gandek;Mark Kosinski;Neil K. Aaronson

  • A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.

    John Brazier;Mark Deverill;Colin Green

  • A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures

    John E. Brazier;Yaling Yang;Aki Tsuchiya;Donna Louise Rowen

  • A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.

    J Brazier;M Deverill;C Green;R Harper

  • Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment

    Barbara Gandek;John E. Ware Jr.;Neil K. Aaronson;Jordi Alonso

  • Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra

    Karl Claxton;Mark Sculpher;Chris McCabe;Andrew Briggs

  • Evaluating translations of health status questionnaires. Methods from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment.

    John E. Ware Jr.;Susan D. Keller;Barbara Gandek;John E. Brazier

  • A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis

    Carlo A. Marra;John C. Woolcott;Jacek A. Kopec;Kamran Shojania

  • Using the SF‐36 with older adults: a cross‐sectional community‐based survey

    Stephen J. Walters;James F. Munro;John E. Brazier

  • What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D.

    Stephen J Walters;John E Brazier

Frequent Co-Authors

Donna Rowen
Donna Rowen University of Sheffield
Aki Tsuchiya
Aki Tsuchiya University of Sheffield
Brendan Mulhern
Brendan Mulhern University of Technology Sydney
Julie Ratcliffe
Julie Ratcliffe Flinders University
Michael Barkham
Michael Barkham University of Sheffield
Janice Connell
Janice Connell University of Sheffield
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
Jennifer Roberts
Jennifer Roberts University of Sheffield
Nancy Devlin
Nancy Devlin University of Melbourne
Jon Nicholl
Jon Nicholl University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse and growing career fields. In the U.S., flexible learning options make it easier than ever to balance education with work or personal responsibilities.

For those interested in social work, there are cheap msw programs online as well as accelerated msw programs online for faster degree completion. These pathways empower graduates to pursue careers in community agencies, healthcare, and advocacy.

Students seeking a specialized credential in behavioral analysis can now prepare entirely online for the bcba certification online. This certification meets the demand for skilled professionals in education, mental health, and developmental services.

If psychology is your area of interest, a fast track psychology degree online allows for rapid entry into this expansive field offering opportunities in counseling, research, and human resources.

With so many flexible, affordable options, online learning continues to shape the future of Social Sciences and Humanities careers.

Best Scientists Citing John Brazier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles