World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
110
Citations
58182
World Ranking
49
National Ranking
7

John Brazier publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Brazier sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 633 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

John Brazier D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Brazier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

John Brazier is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several fields, primarily Economics, Econometrics and Finance with a focus on related subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, and intersects with Medicine, particularly General Health Professions.

Their main research areas include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, and Quality of Life. They have also worked extensively on topics involving Economic and Environmental Valuation, Healthcare Policy and Management, Global Health Care Issues, Retinal Diseases and Treatments, Retinal Imaging and Analysis, and Health disparities and outcomes.

John Brazier has contributed to frequent publications in a variety of venues, including:

  • Value in Health
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • PharmacoEconomics
  • Quality of Life Research
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)

Their notable recent papers include:

  • Developing a New Version of the SF-6D Health State Classification System From the SF-36v2: SF-6Dv2, 2020, Medical Care
  • The EQ-HWB: Overview of the Development of a Measure of Health and Wellbeing and Key Results, 2022, Value in Health
  • Vignette-Based Utilities: Usefulness, Limitations, and Methodological Recommendations, 2021, Value in Health
  • Valuing the SF-6Dv2 Classification System in the United Kingdom Using a Discrete-choice Experiment With Duration, 2020, Medical Care
  • Valuation of SF-6Dv2 Health States in China Using Time Trade-off and Discrete-Choice Experiment with a Duration Dimension, 2021, PharmacoEconomics

Collaborations are a significant feature of their work, with frequent co-authors including Donna Rowen, Clara Mukuria, Jill Carlton, Brendan Mulhern, and Jan Henrik Terheyden.

John Brazier is recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

    J. E. Brazier;R. Harper;N. M. B. Jones;A. O'cathain

  • The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36

    John Brazier;Jennifer Roberts;Mark Deverill

  • Cross-Validation of Item Selection and Scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in Nine Countries: Results from the IQOLA Project

    Barbara Gandek;John E. Ware;Neil K. Aaronson;Giovanni Apolone

  • Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?

    Milad Karimi;John Brazier

  • The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12.

    John E Brazier;Jennifer Roberts

  • Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D.

    Stephen J. Walters;John E. Brazier

  • Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation

    John Brazier;J Salomon;Julie Ratcliffe;Aki Tsuchiya

  • A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups.

    John Brazier;Jennifer Roberts;Aki Tsuchiya;Jan Busschbach

  • Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire.

    J. Brazier;N. Jones;P. Kind

  • Deriving a Preference-Based Single Index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey

    John Brazier;Tim Usherwood;Rosemary Harper;Kate Thomas

  • The Factor Structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 Countries: Results from the IQOLA Project

    John E. Ware Jr.;Mark Kosinski;Barbara Gandek;Neil K. Aaronson

  • The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment

    John E. Ware Jr.;Barbara Gandek;Mark Kosinski;Neil K. Aaronson

  • A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.

    John Brazier;Mark Deverill;Colin Green

  • A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures

    John E. Brazier;Yaling Yang;Aki Tsuchiya;Donna Louise Rowen

  • A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.

    J Brazier;M Deverill;C Green;R Harper

  • Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment

    Barbara Gandek;John E. Ware Jr.;Neil K. Aaronson;Jordi Alonso

  • Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra

    Karl Claxton;Mark Sculpher;Chris McCabe;Andrew Briggs

  • Evaluating translations of health status questionnaires. Methods from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment.

    John E. Ware Jr.;Susan D. Keller;Barbara Gandek;John E. Brazier

  • A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis

    Carlo A. Marra;John C. Woolcott;Jacek A. Kopec;Kamran Shojania

  • Using the SF‐36 with older adults: a cross‐sectional community‐based survey

    Stephen J. Walters;James F. Munro;John E. Brazier

  • What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D.

    Stephen J Walters;John E Brazier

Frequent Co-Authors

Donna Rowen
Donna Rowen University of Sheffield
Aki Tsuchiya
Aki Tsuchiya University of Sheffield
Brendan Mulhern
Brendan Mulhern University of Technology Sydney
Julie Ratcliffe
Julie Ratcliffe Flinders University
Michael Barkham
Michael Barkham University of Sheffield
Janice Connell
Janice Connell University of Sheffield
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
Jennifer Roberts
Jennifer Roberts University of Sheffield
Nancy Devlin
Nancy Devlin University of Melbourne
Jon Nicholl
Jon Nicholl University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse and growing career fields. In the U.S., flexible learning options make it easier than ever to balance education with work or personal responsibilities.

For those interested in social work, there are cheap msw programs online as well as accelerated msw programs online for faster degree completion. These pathways empower graduates to pursue careers in community agencies, healthcare, and advocacy.

Students seeking a specialized credential in behavioral analysis can now prepare entirely online for the bcba certification online. This certification meets the demand for skilled professionals in education, mental health, and developmental services.

If psychology is your area of interest, a fast track psychology degree online allows for rapid entry into this expansive field offering opportunities in counseling, research, and human resources.

With so many flexible, affordable options, online learning continues to shape the future of Social Sciences and Humanities careers.

Best Scientists Citing John Brazier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles