World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11496 10808 1089 1041 526 56324

Sarah E Lamb publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sarah E Lamb between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sarah E Lamb published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 21.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2017. 56 of the 728 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2017. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 56 publications 2016: 44 publications 2017: 57 publications 2018: 48 publications 2019: 56 publications 2020: 49 publications 2021: 57 publications 2022: 50 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 55 publications 2026: 1 publication
1993 2026

728 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sarah E Lamb: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 4
1998 2
1999 3
2000 7
2001 8
2002 9
2003 4
2004 8
2005 11
2006 5
2007 5
2008 14
2009 16
2010 11
2011 13
2012 11
2013 31
2014 24
2015 56
2016 44
2017 57
2018 48
2019 56
2020 49
2021 57
2022 50
2023 36
2024 29
2025 55
2026 1
Total 728
Download as CSV

Sarah E Lamb publications per year - data summary

  • Sarah E Lamb, a Medicine scholar from University of Exeter, has 728 publications recorded across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1993 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive years are 2017 and 2021, with 57 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1994, 1995 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 34 years in the span carries no publications at all (1996).
  • The rate of publication averages 21.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 22.1 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 171 publications, 23% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1993-2004: 49 publications (4.1 per year); 2005-2016: 241 publications (20.1 per year); 2017-2026: 438 publications (43.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Sarah E Lamb publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah E Lamb sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 526 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610 526
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Sarah E Lamb publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Sarah E Lamb, a Medicine scholar from University of Exeter, records 526 publications - the 62nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 62% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Sarah E Lamb, and about 38% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Sarah E Lamb ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Sarah E Lamb D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah E Lamb sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Sarah E Lamb D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Sarah E Lamb, a Medicine scholar from University of Exeter, records 91 D-Index - the 43rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 43% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Sarah E Lamb, and about 57% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Sarah E Lamb ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Sarah E Lamb is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Medicine, with significant contributions to several subfields including Surgery, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Economics and Econometrics, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

The main topics of their work encompass musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life. They have also contributed to research in cerebral palsy and movement disorders, balance, gait, and falls prevention, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, shoulder injury and treatment, and meta-analysis and systematic reviews.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Esther Williamson, Sally Hopewell, Susan Dutton, Gary S. Collins, and Ioana R. Marian, reflecting collaborative efforts across various studies and publications.

Sarah E Lamb has published extensively in several journals, with notable frequent venues including BMJ Open, Health Technology Assessment, Physiotherapy, Trials, and Age and Ageing.

The following are some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Sarah E Lamb:

  • World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative, 2022, Age and Ageing
  • A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies, 2021, JAMA
  • Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Fall Prevention and Management for Older Adults, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials, 2025, BMJ
  • Physical Activity and Exercise in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: An Umbrella Review of Intervention and Observational Studies, 2020, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Best Publications

  • Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

    Tammy C Hoffmann;Paul P Glasziou;Isabelle Boutron;Ruairidh Milne

  • Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community

    Lesley D. Gillespie;Mary Clare Robertson;William J. Gillespie;Catherine Sherrington

  • Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people

    Lesley D. Gillespie;W. J. Gillespie;Mary Clare Robertson;Sarah E. Lamb

  • WITHDRAWN: Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people.

    Gillespie Ld;Gillespie Wj;Robertson Mc;Lamb Se

  • Development of a Common Outcome Data Set for Fall Injury Prevention Trials: The Prevention of Falls Network Europe Consensus

    Sarah E. Lamb;Ellen C. Jorstad-Stein;Klaus Hauer;Clemens Becker

  • Summary of the updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society clinical practice guideline for prevention of falls in older persons

    Kenny Ram.;L Z Rubenstein;M E Tinetti;K Brewer

  • Exercise for Preventing Falls in Older People Living in the Community

    Catherine Sherrington;Anne Tiedemann;Nicola J Fairhall;Sally Hopewell

  • High-frequency oscillation for acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Duncan Young;Sarah E Lamb;Sanjoy Shah;Iain MacKenzie

  • Measuring the psychological outcomes of falling: a systematic review.

    Ellen C. Jørstad;Klaus Hauer;Clemens Becker;Sarah E. Lamb

  • Systematic review of definitions and methods of measuring falls in randomised controlled fall prevention trials

    Klaus Hauer;Sarah E. Lamb;Ellen C. Jorstad;Chris Todd

  • Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial

    Anders Prestmo;Gunhild Hagen;Olav Sletvold;Jorunn L Helbostad

  • Core outcome measures for interventions to prevent or slow the progress of dementia for people living with mild to moderate dementia: Systematic review and consensus recommendations

    Lucy Webster;Derek Groskreutz;Anna Grinbergs-Saull Grinbergs-Saull;Rob Howard

  • Multifactorial and multiple component interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community

    Sally Hopewell;Olubusola Adedire;Bethan J. Copsey;Graham J. Boniface

  • Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community (Review)

    Lesley D. Gillespie;M. Clare Robertson;William J. Gillespie;S. E. Lamb

  • Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial

    Gavin D. Perkins;Gavin D. Perkins;Ranjit Lall;Tom Quinn;Charles D. Deakin;Charles D. Deakin

  • Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Simon Gates;Joanne D. Fisher;Matthew Cooke;Yvonne Carter

  • Group cognitive behavioural treatment for low-back pain in primary care: a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis

    Sarah E Lamb;Sarah E Lamb;Zara Hansen;Ranjit Lall;Emanuela Castelnuovo

  • Maximising response to postal questionnaires – A systematic review of randomised trials in health research

    Rachel A Nakash;Jane L Hutton;Ellen C Jørstad-Stein;Simon Gates

  • Effect of exercise on depression severity in older people: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Christopher Bridle;Kathleen Spanjers;Shilpa Patel;Nicola M. Atherton

  • Interventions for preventing falls in the elderly

    L D Gillespie;W J Gillespie;R Cumming;S E Lamb

Frequent Co-Authors

Stavros Petrou
Stavros Petrou University of Oxford
Gavin D. Perkins
Gavin D. Perkins University of Warwick
Nigel Stallard
Nigel Stallard University of Warwick
Sally Hopewell
Sally Hopewell University of Oxford
David J. Torgerson
David J. Torgerson University of York
Frances Griffiths
Frances Griffiths University of Warwick
Gary S. Collins
Gary S. Collins University of Oxford
David Ring
David Ring The University of Texas at Austin
Andrew Carr
Andrew Carr University of Oxford
Neil S. Coulson
Neil S. Coulson University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up flexible and affordable routes to a career in healthcare. For nursing professionals, pursuing advanced qualifications is now more accessible than ever with affordable online options. For instance, students interested in the highest level of education can consider the cheapest phd nursing programs, allowing you to advance in research or leadership without breaking the bank.

If you're a registered nurse seeking to complete your bachelor's, it's important to know the average cost of rn to bsn programs so you can budget smartly and select a program that fits your financial needs.

For those with non-nursing backgrounds wanting a fast track into the profession, direct entry msn programs online provide an accelerated pathway to an advanced nursing degree.

Finally, if entry requirements are a concern, researching what is the easiest nursing program to get into can help you find schools with less competitive admissions, making your healthcare career journey easier to start.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah E Lamb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles