World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
43
Citations
7579
World Ranking
1695
National Ranking
117

Nigel Stallard publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel Stallard sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 215 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Nigel Stallard D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel Stallard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A randomized trial of epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

    Gavin D. Perkins;Chen Ji;Charles D. Deakin;Tom Quinn

  • DELTA2 guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial

    Jonathan A. Cook;Steven A. Julious;William Sones;Lisa V. Hampson;Lisa V. Hampson

  • Optimal Adaptive Designs for Binary Response Trials

    William F. Rosenberger;William F. Rosenberger;Nigel Stallard;Anastasia Ivanova;Cherice N. Harper

  • Comments on the draft guidance on “Adaptive design clinical trials for drugs and biologics” of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration

    Werner Brannath;Hans Ulrich Burger;Ekkehard Glimm;Nigel Stallard

  • Sequential designs for phase III clinical trials incorporating treatment selection.

    Nigel Stallard;Susan Todd

  • HIV self-testing alone or with additional interventions, including financial incentives, and linkage to care or prevention among male partners of antenatal care clinic attendees in Malawi: An adaptive multi-arm, multi-stage cluster randomised trial.

    Augustine T Choko;Elizabeth L Corbett;Elizabeth L Corbett;Nigel Stallard;Hendramoorthy Maheswaran

  • Effectiveness of a Web-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Tool to Improve Mental Well-Being in the General Population: Randomized Controlled Trial

    John Powell;Thomas Hamborg;Nigel Stallard;Amanda Burls

  • DELTA2 guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial

    Jonathan A Cook;Steven A Julious;William Sones;Lisa V Hampson;Lisa V Hampson

  • A group-sequential design for clinical trials with treatment selection.

    Nigel Stallard;Tim Friede

  • Optimal sample sizes for phase II clinical trials and pilot studies.

    Nigel Stallard

  • A confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trial design incorporating short-term endpoint information.

    Nigel Stallard

  • Efficacy of three neuroprotective drugs in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS-SMART) : a phase 2b, multiarm, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial

    Jeremy Chataway;Jeremy Chataway;Floriana De Angelis;Peter Connick;Richard A Parker

  • Methods for identification and confirmation of targeted subgroups in clinical trials: A systematic review

    Thomas Ondra;Alex Dmitrienko;Tim Friede;Alexandra Graf

  • A conditional error function approach for subgroup selection in adaptive clinical trials.

    Tim Friede;Nicholas R. Parsons;Nigel Stallard

  • Sample size determination for phase II clinical trials based on Bayesian decision theory.

    Nigel Stallard

  • Designing a seamless phase II/III clinical trial using early outcomes for treatment selection: an application in multiple sclerosis

    Tim Friede;Nicholas R. Parsons;Nigel Stallard;S. Todd

  • An adaptive group sequential design for phase II/III clinical trials that select a single treatment from several.

    Patrick J Kelly;Nigel Stallard;Susan Todd

  • Bayesian Graphical Models for Genomewide Association Studies

    Claudio J. Verzilli;Nigel Stallard;John C. Whittaker

  • Seamless phase II/III designs.

    Nigel Stallard;Susan Todd

  • A New Clinical Trial Design Combining Phases 2 and 3: Sequential Designs with Treatment Selection and a Change of Endpoint

    Susan Todd;Nigel Stallard

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah E Pinder
Sarah E Pinder King's College London
John M. S. Bartlett
John M. S. Bartlett University of Toronto
Gavin D. Perkins
Gavin D. Perkins University of Warwick
Sarah E Lamb
Sarah E Lamb University of Exeter
Gavin Giovannoni
Gavin Giovannoni Queen Mary University of London
Stavros Petrou
Stavros Petrou University of Oxford
Jenny L Donovan
Jenny L Donovan University of Bristol
Sarah Stewart-Brown
Sarah Stewart-Brown University of Warwick
Frances Griffiths
Frances Griffiths University of Warwick
Margaret Thorogood
Margaret Thorogood University of Warwick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals transition into business fields, where skills in quantitative analysis and problem-solving are highly valued.

Those interested in business management might consider the easiest and fastest online MBA programs, which offer flexibility and can enhance leadership skills without interrupting your current career.

For a deeper focus on executive leadership and strategic decision-making, DBA online programs provide advanced knowledge that aligns well with mathematical expertise in data-driven industries.

Finance is another lucrative pathway where mathematical proficiency is crucial. Exploring the best online masters in finance offers specialized training in financial modeling and risk management.

Finally, to accelerate career advancement, students may opt for accelerated online MBA programs, designed to fast-track education while maintaining a strong foundation in core business competencies.

Best Scientists Citing Nigel Stallard

Recently Published Articles