World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William F. Rosenberger

William F. Rosenberger

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
40
Citations
6591
World Ranking
2060
National Ranking
875

William F. Rosenberger publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William F. Rosenberger sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 147 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

William F. Rosenberger D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William F. Rosenberger sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

William F. Rosenberger is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. Their body of work is situated primarily within the fields of Mathematics and Decision Sciences, with a notable focus on Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, as well as Economics and Econometrics. Rosenberger's research encompasses a range of specialized subfields including Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their research interests concentrate heavily on several core topics:

  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Viral Infections and Immunology Research

Rosenberger has contributed to multiple publication venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
  • Biometrics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Statistics in Medicine

Several recent publications illustrate the scope of Rosenberger's research work, including:

  • The Temptation of Overgeneralizing Response-adaptive Randomization, 2020, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Randomization-based interval estimation in randomized clinical trials, 2020, Statistics in Medicine
  • Design Considerations for Two-Stage Enrichment Clinical Trials, 2022, Biometrics
  • Using Randomization Tests to Address Disruptions in Clinical Trials: A Report from the NISS Ingram Olkin Forum Series on Unplanned Clinical Trial Disruptions, 2023, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
  • Inference for a two-stage enrichment design, 2021, The Annals of Statistics

The scientist has collaborated frequently with various researchers, including:

  • Diane Uschner
  • Sofía S. Villar
  • Oleksandr Sverdlov
  • Jonathan Chipman
  • Lukas Pin

William F. Rosenberger was recognized as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2005.

Best Publications

  • Randomization in Clinical Trials: Theory and Practice

    William F. Rosenberger;John M. Lachin

  • The Theory of Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials

    Feifang Hu;William F. Rosenberger

  • Optimal Adaptive Designs for Binary Response Trials

    William F. Rosenberger;William F. Rosenberger;Nigel Stallard;Anastasia Ivanova;Cherice N. Harper

  • Optimality, Variability, Power

    Feifang Hu;William F Rosenberger

  • A Random Walk Rule for Phase I Clinical Trials

    Stephen D. Durham;Nancy Flournoy;William F. Rosenberger

  • Handling Covariates in the Design of Clinical Trials.

    William F. Rosenberger;Oleksandr Sverdlov

  • Competing designs for phase I clinical trials: a review.

    William F. Rosenberger;William F. Rosenberger;Linda M. Haines

  • New directions in adaptive designs

    William F. Rosenberger

  • The use of response-adaptive designs in clinical trials.

    William F. Rosenberger;John M. Lachin

  • Randomization in clinical trials

    William Rosenberger

  • Response‐Adaptive Randomization for Clinical Trials with Continuous Outcomes

    Lanju Zhang;William F. Rosenberger;William F. Rosenberger;William F. Rosenberger

  • Implementing Optimal Allocation in Sequential Binary Response Experiments

    Yevgen Tymofyeyev;William F Rosenberger;Feifang Hu

  • Randomization in Clinical Trials: Rosenberger/Randomization in Clinical Trials

    William F. Rosenberger;John M. Lachin

  • Bayesian optimal designs for Phase I clinical trials.

    Linda M. Haines;Inna Perevozskaya;Inna Perevozskaya;William F. Rosenberger;William F. Rosenberger

  • Asymptotic Properties of Adaptive designs for Clinical Trials with delayed Response

    Z.D. Bai;Feifang Hu;William F. Rosenberger

  • Closed-form estimates for missing counts in two-way contingency tables

    Stuart G. Baker;William F. Rosenberger;Rebecca Dersimonian

  • Asymptotically best response-adaptive randomization procedures

    Feifang Hu;William F. Rosenberger;William F. Rosenberger;William F. Rosenberger;Li-Xin Zhang;Li-Xin Zhang

  • Ethics and practice: alternative designs for phase III randomized clinical trials.

    Christopher R Palmer;William F Rosenberger

  • Covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs for binary response.

    William F. Rosenberger;A. N. Vidyashankar;Deepak K. Agarwal

  • Randomized play-the-winner clinical trials: review and recommendations.

    William F. Rosenberger

  • Asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood estimators from multiparameter response-driven designs

    William F. Rosenberger;Nancy Flournoy;Stephen D. Durham

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Lachin
John M. Lachin George Washington University
Feifang Hu
Feifang Hu George Washington University
Alan B. Zonderman
Alan B. Zonderman National Institutes of Health
Eliot L. Siegel
Eliot L. Siegel University of Maryland, Baltimore
Michele K. Evans
Michele K. Evans National Institutes of Health
Christos Davatzikos
Christos Davatzikos University of Pennsylvania
Zhidong Bai
Zhidong Bai Northeast Normal University
Nigel Stallard
Nigel Stallard University of Warwick
Mark Hallett
Mark Hallett National Institutes of Health
Sylvie Chevret
Sylvie Chevret Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mathematics opens numerous career pathways, often requiring further specialization. For those interested in leadership roles, an easiest mba program to get into can provide a solid foundation in business management. These MBA programs often offer flexible schedules, making them ideal for working professionals looking to expand their expertise swiftly.

Alternatively, students might consider the easiest and fastest online mba programs, which prioritize streamlined coursework and quicker graduation timelines without compromising on quality. These options are perfect for those who want to transition into managerial roles in finance, analytics, or tech industries.

For advanced research or consultancy roles, pursuing a Doctorate in Business Administration (DBA) can be beneficial. Numerous dba online programs make it possible to study at your own pace while gaining expertise in the intersection of math and business strategy.

Those inclined toward finance might find that enrolling in the cheapest masters in finance offers a cost-effective way to acquire essential financial skills that complement mathematical training, broadening career opportunities in banking, investment, and financial analysis.

Best Scientists Citing William F. Rosenberger

Trending Scientists