World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11777 11079 452 438 908 29638

Willem Weimar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Willem Weimar between 1977 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Willem Weimar published across 47 years, from 1977 to 2023, averaging 19.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 87 publications in 2014. 4 of the 911 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 87. Peak 87 publications in 2014. 1977: 3 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 17 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 20 publications 1998: 37 publications 1999: 33 publications 2000: 28 publications 2001: 29 publications 2002: 25 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 31 publications 2005: 35 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 45 publications 2009: 39 publications 2010: 37 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 75 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 87 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications
1977 2023

911 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Willem Weimar: publications per year, 1977 to 2023
Year Publications
1977 3
1978 2
1979 3
1980 6
1981 5
1982 3
1983 2
1984 2
1985 9
1986 8
1987 8
1988 10
1989 8
1990 9
1991 7
1992 17
1993 8
1994 17
1995 17
1996 17
1997 20
1998 37
1999 33
2000 28
2001 29
2002 25
2003 25
2004 31
2005 35
2006 29
2007 18
2008 45
2009 39
2010 37
2011 31
2012 75
2013 41
2014 87
2015 23
2016 21
2017 8
2018 11
2019 6
2020 8
2021 4
2022 2
2023 2
Total 911
Download as CSV

Willem Weimar publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Willem Weimar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 901–920 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 908 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145 908
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Willem Weimar D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Willem Weimar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Willem Weimar is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with an emphasis on public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, clinical psychology, transplantation, and nephrology.

Their main research topics include organ donation and transplantation, grief, bereavement, and mental health, renal transplantation outcomes and treatments, dialysis and renal disease management, renal and vascular pathologies, palliative care and end-of-life issues, as well as geriatric care and nursing homes.

Willem Weimar has published regularly in several scientific venues. Notably, they have contributed to the journal Transplantation with four publications, followed by two papers in Transplant International. Their work has also appeared in the European Journal of Epidemiology, Patient Education and Counseling, and the British Journal of Health Psychology.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Long-term prognosis after kidney donation: a propensity score matched comparison of living donors and non-donors from two population cohorts (2020, European Journal of Epidemiology)
  • Exploring health literacy and self-management after kidney transplantation: A prospective cohort study (2021, Patient Education and Counseling)
  • Positive and negative aspects of mental health after unspecified living kidney donation: A cohort study (2021, British Journal of Health Psychology)
  • Twenty Years of Unspecified Kidney Donation: Unspecified Donors Looking Back on Their Donation Experiences (2023, Transplant International)
  • Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects (2021, Transplant International)

Their frequent co-authors include Emma K. Massey, Sohal Y. Ismail, Jacqueline van de Wetering, Jan J.V. Busschbach, and Steef Redeker, illustrating strong collaborative efforts across various studies.

Best Publications

  • Genetic polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and MDR‐1 genes and pharmacokinetics of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus

    Dennis A. Hesselink;Ron H. N. van Schaik;Ilse P. van der Heiden;Marloes van der Werf

  • A randomized double-blind, multicenter plasma concentration controlled study of the safety and efficacy of oral mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation.

    T van Gelder;L B Hilbrands;Yves Vanrenterghem;W Weimar

  • The pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic relationship for mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation

    Michael D. Hale;Andrew J. Nicholls;Roy E.S. Bullingham;Ronald Hené

  • Cyclosporine interacts with mycophenolic acid by inhibiting the multidrug resistance-associated protein 2.

    Dennis A. Hesselink;Reinier M. van Hest;Ron A. A. Mathot;Fred Bonthuis

  • High within-patient variability in the clearance of tacrolimus is a risk factor for poor long-term outcome after kidney transplantation

    Lennaert C.P. Borra;Joke I. Roodnat;Judith A. Kal;Ron A.A. Mathot

  • Effect of One-HLA-DR-Antigen–Matched and Completely HLA-DR–Mismatched Blood Transfusions on Survival of Heart and Kidney Allografts

    E L Lagaaij;I P Hennemann;M Ruigrok;M W de Haan

  • FTY720, a novel immunomodulator: efficacy and safety results from the first phase 2A study in de novo renal transplantation.

    Helio Tedesco-Silva;Georges Mourad;Barry D Kahan;Josep Grinyo Boira

  • Three‐Year Efficacy and Safety Results from a Study of Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in de novo Renal Transplant Patients

    Štefan Vítko;Raimund Margreiter;Willem Weimar;Jacques Dantal

  • Proteinuria after renal transplantation affects not only graft survival but also patient survival.

    J. I. Roodnat;P. G. H. Mulder;J. Rischen-Vos;I. C. Van Riemsdijk

  • Human Heart, Spleen, and Perirenal Fat-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Have Immunomodulatory Capacities

    M.J. Hoogduijn;M.J. Crop;A.M.A. Peeters;G.J.V.M. Van Osch

  • The Dutch national living donor kidney exchange program.

    Marry De Klerk;Karin M. Keizer;Frans H. J. Claas;Marian Witvliet

  • Differential effect of calcineurin inhibitors, anti-CD25 antibodies and rapamycin on the induction of FOXP3 in human T cells

    Carla C. Baan;Barbara J. van der Mast;Mariska Klepper;Wendy M. Mol

  • Population pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in kidney and heart transplant recipients and the influence of ethnicity and genetic polymorphisms in the MDR-1, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 genes

    Dennis A. Hesselink;Teun van Gelder;Ron H. N. van Schaik;Aggie H. M. M. Balk

  • Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial

    Niels F M Kok;May Y Lind;Birgitta M E Hansson;Desiree Pilzecker

  • Everolimus (Certican) 12-month safety and efficacy versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients.

    Stefan Vitko;Raimund Margreiter;Willem Weimar;Jacques Dantal

  • Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells abrogate plasmablast formation and induce regulatory B cells independently of T helper cells.

    Marcella Franquesa;Fane Mensah;Ruth Huizinga;Tanja Strini

  • SUCCESSFUL VACCINATION AGAINST VARICELLA ZOSTER VIRUS PRIOR TO KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

    A Geel;W Zuidema;T van Gelder;G van Doornum

  • Effect of obesity on the outcome of kidney transplantation: a 20-year follow-up.

    Ellen Hoogeveen;Jeroen Aalten;Kenneth J. Rothman;Joke Roodnat

  • Acute Dialytic Support for the Critically III: Intermittent Hemodialysis versus Continuous Arteriovenous Hemodiafiltration

    E. F. H. Van Bommel;N. D. Bouvy;K. L. So;R. Zietse

  • PHARMACOGENETICS AND GENOMICS Genetic polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and MDR-1 genes and pharmacokinetics of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus

    Dennis A. Hesselink;Ron H. N. van Schaik;Ilse P. van der Heiden;Marloes van der Werf

Frequent Co-Authors

Carla C. Baan
Carla C. Baan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan N. M. IJzermans
Jan N. M. IJzermans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Teun van Gelder
Teun van Gelder Leiden University Medical Center
Frans H.J. Claas
Frans H.J. Claas Leiden University Medical Center
Martin J. Hoogduijn
Martin J. Hoogduijn Erasmus University Rotterdam
Hubert G. M. Niesters
Hubert G. M. Niesters University Medical Center Groningen
Ad J.J.C. Bogers
Ad J.J.C. Bogers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dave L. Roelen
Dave L. Roelen Leiden University Medical Center
Ron H.N. van Schaik
Ron H.N. van Schaik Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan Passchier
Jan Passchier Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers outside traditional medical school, numerous online degree options offer flexible ways to enter or advance within the field. Many registered nurses are choosing to further their education through an rn to np bridge program, which allows RNs to become nurse practitioners efficiently. Similarly, if you want to earn a bachelor’s degree in nursing but avoid hands-on training requirements, there are rn to bsn programs no clinicals that let you complete studies online without clinical rotations.

The field of nutrition is also growing, and an online degree in nutrition can prepare you for diverse career opportunities such as wellness coaching, dietetics, and community health roles. Those aspiring to leadership or administrative positions in healthcare may consider top online mha programs that are cahme accredited, ensuring quality education that’s recognized by employers.

Exploring these related online degrees can open doors to rewarding roles across the healthcare sector, enhancing your skills while offering greater flexibility and accessibility.

Best Scientists Citing Willem Weimar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles