World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
29638
World Ranking
11778
National Ranking
452

Willem Weimar publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Willem Weimar sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 908 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Willem Weimar D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Willem Weimar sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Willem Weimar is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with an emphasis on public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, clinical psychology, transplantation, and nephrology.

Their main research topics include organ donation and transplantation, grief, bereavement, and mental health, renal transplantation outcomes and treatments, dialysis and renal disease management, renal and vascular pathologies, palliative care and end-of-life issues, as well as geriatric care and nursing homes.

Willem Weimar has published regularly in several scientific venues. Notably, they have contributed to the journal Transplantation with four publications, followed by two papers in Transplant International. Their work has also appeared in the European Journal of Epidemiology, Patient Education and Counseling, and the British Journal of Health Psychology.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Long-term prognosis after kidney donation: a propensity score matched comparison of living donors and non-donors from two population cohorts (2020, European Journal of Epidemiology)
  • Exploring health literacy and self-management after kidney transplantation: A prospective cohort study (2021, Patient Education and Counseling)
  • Positive and negative aspects of mental health after unspecified living kidney donation: A cohort study (2021, British Journal of Health Psychology)
  • Twenty Years of Unspecified Kidney Donation: Unspecified Donors Looking Back on Their Donation Experiences (2023, Transplant International)
  • Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects (2021, Transplant International)

Their frequent co-authors include Emma K. Massey, Sohal Y. Ismail, Jacqueline van de Wetering, Jan J.V. Busschbach, and Steef Redeker, illustrating strong collaborative efforts across various studies.

Best Publications

  • Genetic polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and MDR‐1 genes and pharmacokinetics of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus

    Dennis A. Hesselink;Ron H. N. van Schaik;Ilse P. van der Heiden;Marloes van der Werf

  • A randomized double-blind, multicenter plasma concentration controlled study of the safety and efficacy of oral mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation.

    T van Gelder;L B Hilbrands;Yves Vanrenterghem;W Weimar

  • The pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic relationship for mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation

    Michael D. Hale;Andrew J. Nicholls;Roy E.S. Bullingham;Ronald Hené

  • Cyclosporine interacts with mycophenolic acid by inhibiting the multidrug resistance-associated protein 2.

    Dennis A. Hesselink;Reinier M. van Hest;Ron A. A. Mathot;Fred Bonthuis

  • High within-patient variability in the clearance of tacrolimus is a risk factor for poor long-term outcome after kidney transplantation

    Lennaert C.P. Borra;Joke I. Roodnat;Judith A. Kal;Ron A.A. Mathot

  • Effect of One-HLA-DR-Antigen–Matched and Completely HLA-DR–Mismatched Blood Transfusions on Survival of Heart and Kidney Allografts

    E L Lagaaij;I P Hennemann;M Ruigrok;M W de Haan

  • FTY720, a novel immunomodulator: efficacy and safety results from the first phase 2A study in de novo renal transplantation.

    Helio Tedesco-Silva;Georges Mourad;Barry D Kahan;Josep Grinyo Boira

  • Three‐Year Efficacy and Safety Results from a Study of Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in de novo Renal Transplant Patients

    Štefan Vítko;Raimund Margreiter;Willem Weimar;Jacques Dantal

  • Proteinuria after renal transplantation affects not only graft survival but also patient survival.

    J. I. Roodnat;P. G. H. Mulder;J. Rischen-Vos;I. C. Van Riemsdijk

  • Human Heart, Spleen, and Perirenal Fat-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Have Immunomodulatory Capacities

    M.J. Hoogduijn;M.J. Crop;A.M.A. Peeters;G.J.V.M. Van Osch

  • The Dutch national living donor kidney exchange program.

    Marry De Klerk;Karin M. Keizer;Frans H. J. Claas;Marian Witvliet

  • Differential effect of calcineurin inhibitors, anti-CD25 antibodies and rapamycin on the induction of FOXP3 in human T cells

    Carla C. Baan;Barbara J. van der Mast;Mariska Klepper;Wendy M. Mol

  • Population pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in kidney and heart transplant recipients and the influence of ethnicity and genetic polymorphisms in the MDR-1, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 genes

    Dennis A. Hesselink;Teun van Gelder;Ron H. N. van Schaik;Aggie H. M. M. Balk

  • Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial

    Niels F M Kok;May Y Lind;Birgitta M E Hansson;Desiree Pilzecker

  • Everolimus (Certican) 12-month safety and efficacy versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients.

    Stefan Vitko;Raimund Margreiter;Willem Weimar;Jacques Dantal

  • Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells abrogate plasmablast formation and induce regulatory B cells independently of T helper cells.

    Marcella Franquesa;Fane Mensah;Ruth Huizinga;Tanja Strini

  • SUCCESSFUL VACCINATION AGAINST VARICELLA ZOSTER VIRUS PRIOR TO KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

    A Geel;W Zuidema;T van Gelder;G van Doornum

  • Effect of obesity on the outcome of kidney transplantation: a 20-year follow-up.

    Ellen Hoogeveen;Jeroen Aalten;Kenneth J. Rothman;Joke Roodnat

  • Acute Dialytic Support for the Critically III: Intermittent Hemodialysis versus Continuous Arteriovenous Hemodiafiltration

    E. F. H. Van Bommel;N. D. Bouvy;K. L. So;R. Zietse

  • PHARMACOGENETICS AND GENOMICS Genetic polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and MDR-1 genes and pharmacokinetics of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus

    Dennis A. Hesselink;Ron H. N. van Schaik;Ilse P. van der Heiden;Marloes van der Werf

Frequent Co-Authors

Carla C. Baan
Carla C. Baan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan N. M. IJzermans
Jan N. M. IJzermans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Teun van Gelder
Teun van Gelder Leiden University Medical Center
Frans H.J. Claas
Frans H.J. Claas Leiden University Medical Center
Martin J. Hoogduijn
Martin J. Hoogduijn Erasmus University Rotterdam
Hubert G. M. Niesters
Hubert G. M. Niesters University Medical Center Groningen
Ad J.J.C. Bogers
Ad J.J.C. Bogers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dave L. Roelen
Dave L. Roelen Leiden University Medical Center
Ron H.N. van Schaik
Ron H.N. van Schaik Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan Passchier
Jan Passchier Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers outside traditional medical school, numerous online degree options offer flexible ways to enter or advance within the field. Many registered nurses are choosing to further their education through an rn to np bridge program, which allows RNs to become nurse practitioners efficiently. Similarly, if you want to earn a bachelor’s degree in nursing but avoid hands-on training requirements, there are rn to bsn programs no clinicals that let you complete studies online without clinical rotations.

The field of nutrition is also growing, and an online degree in nutrition can prepare you for diverse career opportunities such as wellness coaching, dietetics, and community health roles. Those aspiring to leadership or administrative positions in healthcare may consider top online mha programs that are cahme accredited, ensuring quality education that’s recognized by employers.

Exploring these related online degrees can open doors to rewarding roles across the healthcare sector, enhancing your skills while offering greater flexibility and accessibility.

Best Scientists Citing Willem Weimar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles