World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 86 14254 13423 544 527 511 23911

Teun van Gelder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Teun van Gelder between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Teun van Gelder published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2021. 23 of the 563 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2021. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 21 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 4 publications
1981 2026

563 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Teun van Gelder: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 4
1990 0
1991 2
1992 2
1993 2
1994 1
1995 5
1996 3
1997 10
1998 17
1999 20
2000 14
2001 19
2002 21
2003 17
2004 14
2005 9
2006 5
2007 5
2008 15
2009 29
2010 12
2011 19
2012 18
2013 16
2014 23
2015 25
2016 26
2017 29
2018 27
2019 22
2020 27
2021 32
2022 15
2023 21
2024 13
2025 19
2026 4
Total 563
Download as CSV

Teun van Gelder publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teun van Gelder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 511 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 511
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Teun van Gelder D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teun van Gelder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 86
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Teun van Gelder is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands and has a focused research career predominantly in the field of Medicine. Their body of work encompasses 284 publications, with a significant emphasis on subfields such as Transplantation, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacology, Oncology, and Family Practice.

Their research topics include:

  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Neurological Complications and Syndromes
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Pharmaceutical studies and practices

Teun van Gelder's frequent co-authors include:

  • Dennis A. Hesselink
  • Dirk Jan A. R. Moes
  • Birgit C. P. Koch
  • Brenda C. M. de Winter
  • Patricia M. L. A. van den Bemt

Their publications often appear in established journals in the clinical pharmacology and transplantation domains. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
  • Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
  • Journal of Hypertension
  • Transplantation

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Teun van Gelder include:

  • Personalized Therapy for Mycophenolate: Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology, 2021, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
  • Failure of target attainment of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients and associated risk factors: a two-center prospective study (EXPAT), 2020, Critical Care
  • The effect of therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactam and fluoroquinolones on clinical outcome in critically ill patients: the DOLPHIN trial protocol of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial, 2020, BMC Infectious Diseases
  • Risperidone plasma concentrations are associated with side effects and effectiveness in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder, 2020, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
  • Severe COVID-19 in a renal transplant recipient: A focus on pharmacokinetics, 2020, American Journal of Transplantation

Best Publications

  • A randomized double-blind, multicenter plasma concentration controlled study of the safety and efficacy of oral mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation.

    T van Gelder;L B Hilbrands;Yves Vanrenterghem;W Weimar

  • Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus-Personalized Therapy : Second Consensus Report

    Mercè Brunet;Teun Van Gelder;Anders Åsberg;Vincent Haufroid;Vincent Haufroid

  • Cyclosporine interacts with mycophenolic acid by inhibiting the multidrug resistance-associated protein 2.

    Dennis A. Hesselink;Reinier M. van Hest;Ron A. A. Mathot;Fred Bonthuis

  • The Effect of Tolerance to Noninherited Maternal HLA Antigens on the Survival of Renal Transplants from Sibling Donors

    W.J. Burlingham;A.P. Grailer;D.M. Heisey;F.H.J. Claas

  • Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in transplantation.

    Teun van Gelder;Yann Le Meur;Leslie M Shaw;Michael Oellerich

  • Comparison of the effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid.

    Teun van Gelder;Jochen Klupp;Markus J. Barten;Uwe Christians

  • Consensus report on therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in solid organ transplantation.

    Dirk R.J. Kuypers;Yannick Le Meur;Marcelo Cantarovich;Michael J. Tredger

  • Comparing Mycophenolate Mofetil Regimens for de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: The Fixed-Dose Concentration-Controlled Trial

    Teun van Gelder;Helio Tedesco Silva;Johan W. de Fijter;Klemens Budde

  • Practical Recommendations for Long-term Management of Modifiable Risks in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: A Guidance Report and Clinical Checklist by the Consensus on Managing Modifiable Risk in Transplantation (COMMIT) Group.

    James M. Neuberger;Wolf O. Bechstein;Dirk R.J. Kuypers;Patrizia Burra

  • Current issues in therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid: report of a roundtable discussion.

    Leslie M. Shaw;David W. Holt;Michael Oellerich;Bruno Meiser

  • Drug–drug interactions with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: a clinical perspective

    Roelof W F van Leeuwen;Teun van Gelder;Ron H J Mathijssen;Frank G A Jansman

  • High within-patient variability in the clearance of tacrolimus is a risk factor for poor long-term outcome after kidney transplantation

    Lennaert C.P. Borra;Joke I. Roodnat;Judith A. Kal;Ron A.A. Mathot

  • Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in cancer patients treated with oral anticancer drugs

    van Robert Leeuwen;van Robert Leeuwen;D. H. S. Brundel;C. Neef;T. van Gelder

  • Explaining Variability in Mycophenolic Acid Exposure to Optimize Mycophenolate Mofetil Dosing: A Population Pharmacokinetic Meta-Analysis of Mycophenolic Acid in Renal Transplant Recipients

    Reinier M. van Hest;Ron A.A. Mathot;Mark D. Pescovitz;Robert Gordon

  • Proteinuria after renal transplantation affects not only graft survival but also patient survival.

    J. I. Roodnat;P. G. H. Mulder;J. Rischen-Vos;I. C. Van Riemsdijk

  • Pharmacokinetics of intravenous immunoglobulin and outcome in Guillain-Barré syndrome

    Krista Kuitwaard;Jenny de Gelder;Anne P. Tio-Gillen;Wim C. J. Hop

  • Population pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in kidney and heart transplant recipients and the influence of ethnicity and genetic polymorphisms in the MDR-1, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 genes

    Dennis A. Hesselink;Teun van Gelder;Ron H. N. van Schaik;Aggie H. M. M. Balk

  • Intra-patient variability in tacrolimus exposure: causes, consequences for clinical management.

    Nauras Shuker;Teun van Gelder;Dennis A. Hesselink

  • SUCCESSFUL VACCINATION AGAINST VARICELLA ZOSTER VIRUS PRIOR TO KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

    A Geel;W Zuidema;T van Gelder;G van Doornum

  • PHARMACOGENETICS AND GENOMICS Genetic polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and MDR-1 genes and pharmacokinetics of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus

    Dennis A. Hesselink;Ron H. N. van Schaik;Ilse P. van der Heiden;Marloes van der Werf

Frequent Co-Authors

Willem Weimar
Willem Weimar Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ron H.N. van Schaik
Ron H.N. van Schaik Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dirk Kuypers
Dirk Kuypers KU Leuven
Klemens Budde
Klemens Budde Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ron H.J. Mathijssen
Ron H.J. Mathijssen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Carla C. Baan
Carla C. Baan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan N. M. IJzermans
Jan N. M. IJzermans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Bruno H. Stricker
Bruno H. Stricker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Albert Hofman
Albert Hofman Harvard University
Pierre Marquet
Pierre Marquet University of Limoges

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Medicine in the USA, it's helpful to explore alternative online degrees and healthcare career pathways. These flexible options are ideal for students who want to enter the medical field quickly, advance their credentials, or move into specialized roles.

For those interested in pharmaceuticals, the best online pharmacy school programs offer advanced training for future pharmacists. If information management and technology appeal to you, accredited him programs provide expertise in managing medical records and healthcare data, a field that continues to grow in demand.

Students looking for a quicker entry point may want to investigate how much is medical billing and coding school to understand the investment and opportunities in this administrative and technical field. For nurses seeking advancement, online nurse practitioner programs allow for career progression and increased responsibility—all while studying flexibly.

Each of these online pathways offers unique benefits, affordability, and the flexibility to balance your studies with work or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Teun van Gelder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles