World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 129 2596 2423 101 100 777 62058

Bruno H. Stricker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bruno H. Stricker between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bruno H. Stricker published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 18.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2016. 20 of the 842 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2016. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 23 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 29 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 28 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 33 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 48 publications 2015: 42 publications 2016: 56 publications 2017: 50 publications 2018: 48 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 31 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 8 publications
1981 2025

842 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bruno H. Stricker: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 2
1986 3
1987 3
1988 4
1989 1
1990 4
1991 2
1992 11
1993 12
1994 10
1995 10
1996 13
1997 10
1998 14
1999 13
2000 6
2001 13
2002 23
2003 12
2004 29
2005 15
2006 28
2007 24
2008 25
2009 33
2010 30
2011 31
2012 32
2013 34
2014 48
2015 42
2016 56
2017 50
2018 48
2019 32
2020 31
2021 22
2022 22
2023 21
2024 12
2025 8
Total 842
Download as CSV

Bruno H. Stricker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno H. Stricker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 761–780 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 777 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228 777
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Bruno H. Stricker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno H. Stricker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 128–129 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 129 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230 129
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bruno H. Stricker is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with substantial contributions across several subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Physiology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientific work of Bruno H. Stricker encompasses a range of topics. These include:

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Gut microbiota and health

The researcher has published extensively in various academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • ERJ Open Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Clinical Research in Cardiology
  • PLoS ONE

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Bruno H. Stricker illustrate involvement in diverse epidemiological and clinical studies. Selected publications are:

  • Objectives, design and main findings until 2020 from the Rotterdam Study, 2020, European Journal of Epidemiology
  • Integration of epidemiologic, pharmacologic, genetic and gut microbiome data in a drug-metabolite atlas, 2020, Nature Medicine
  • Validation of the BOADICEA model and a 313-variant polygenic risk score for breast cancer risk prediction in a Dutch prospective cohort, 2020, Genetics in Medicine
  • Prevalence and incidence of, and risk factors for chronic cough in the adult population: the Rotterdam Study, 2020, ERJ Open Research
  • Epigenetic Link Between Statin Therapy and Type 2 Diabetes, 2020, Diabetes Care

Collaborative research is a notable aspect of Stricker's scientific activity. Frequent co-authors associated with their work include:

  • M. Arfan Ikram
  • Guy Brusselle
  • Maryam Kavousi
  • André G. Uitterlinden
  • Lies Lahousse

Best Publications

  • Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study

    Jan Heeringa;Deirdre A.M. van der Kuip;Albert Hofman;Jan A. Kors

  • Projections on the number of individuals with atrial fibrillation in the European Union, from 2000 to 2060

    Bouwe P. Krijthe;Anton Kunst;Emelia J. Benjamin;Gregory Y.H. Lip

  • Quantifying the heart failure epidemic: prevalence, incidence rate, lifetime risk and prognosis of heart failure The Rotterdam Study.

    Gysèle S. Bleumink;Anneke M. Knetsch;Miriam C.J.M. Sturkenboom;Sabine M.J.M. Straus

  • The Rotterdam Study: Objectives and design update

    Albert Hofman;Guy G. O. Brusselle;Sarwa Darwish Murad;Cornelia M. van Duijn

  • Risk of community-acquired pneumonia and use of gastric acid-suppressive drugs.

    Robert J. F. Laheij;Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom;Robert-Jan Hassing;Jeanne Dieleman

  • Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs and the Risk of Alzheimer's Disease

    in t' Veld Ba;Ruitenberg A;Hofman A;Launer Lj

  • Adherence to cardiovascular therapy: a meta-analysis of prevalence and clinical consequences

    Rajiv Chowdhury;Hassan Khan;Emma Heydon;Amir Shroufi

  • Prolonged QTc interval and risk of sudden cardiac death in a population of older adults

    Sabine M.J.M. Straus;Jan A. Kors;Marie L. De Bruin;Cornelis S. van der Hooft

  • Simple risk model predicts incidence of atrial fibrillation in a racially and geographically diverse population: the CHARGE-AF consortium

    Alvaro Alonso;Bouwe P. Krijthe;Thor Aspelund;Katherine A. Stepas

  • Meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies identify multiple loci associated with pulmonary function

    Dana B. Hancock;Mark Eijgelsheim;Jemma B. Wilk;Sina A. Gharib

  • Confounding by Indication: An Example of Variation in the Use of Epidemiologic Terminology

    Maribel Salas;Albert Hotman;Bruno H. Stricker

  • Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function

    Cristian Pattaro;Alexander Teumer;Mathias Gorski;Audrey Y. Chu

  • Multiancestry association study identifies new asthma risk loci that colocalize with immune-cell enhancer marks

    Florence Demenais;Florence Demenais;Patricia Margaritte-Jeannin;Patricia Margaritte-Jeannin;Kathleen C. Barnes;William O.C. Cookson

  • Statins are associated with a reduced risk of Alzheimer disease regardless of lipophilicity. The Rotterdam Study.

    Mendel D M Haag;Albert Hofman;Peter J Koudstaal;Bruno H C Stricker

  • Polypharmacy and falls in the middle age and elderly population.

    G. Ziere;J. P. Dieleman;A. Hofman;H A. P. Pols

  • Common variants at ten loci influence QT interval duration in the QTGEN Study.

    Christopher Newton-Cheh;Christopher Newton-Cheh;Mark Eijgelsheim;Kenneth M Rice;Paul I W de Bakker;Paul I W de Bakker

  • Genome-wide association study of PR interval

    Arne Pfeufer;Charlotte Van Noord;Kristin D. Marciante;Dan E. Arking

  • Genome-wide association and large-scale follow up identifies 16 new loci influencing lung function

    María Soler Artigas;Daan W. Loth;Louise V. Wain;Sina A. Gharib

  • The Rotterdam Study: 2018 update on objectives, design and main results.

    M. Arfan Ikram;Guy G. O. Brusselle;Guy G. O. Brusselle;Sarwa Darwish Murad;Cornelia M. van Duijn

  • Benzodiazepines and the Risk of Falling Leading to Femur Fractures: Dosage More Important Than Elimination Half-life

    R. M. C. Herings;B. H. C. Stricker;A. De Boer;A. Bakker

Frequent Co-Authors

Albert Hofman
Albert Hofman Harvard University
Guy Brusselle
Guy Brusselle Ghent University Hospital
André G. Uitterlinden
André G. Uitterlinden Erasmus University Rotterdam
Bruce M. Psaty
Bruce M. Psaty University of Washington
Jacqueline C.M. Witteman
Jacqueline C.M. Witteman Erasmus University Rotterdam
Oscar H. Franco
Oscar H. Franco University Medical Center Utrecht
M. Arfan Ikram
M. Arfan Ikram Erasmus University Rotterdam
Susan R. Heckbert
Susan R. Heckbert University of Washington
Jerome I. Rotter
Jerome I. Rotter UCLA Medical Center
Fernando Rivadeneira
Fernando Rivadeneira Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary pathways to traditional medical school can open doors to rewarding healthcare careers. Many students choose online programs for flexibility and affordability. For example, those interested in advanced nursing practice often look for the most affordable DNP programs to become nurse practitioners or nurse leaders while balancing work and study.

Pharmacy is another popular healthcare field. Pursuing an online pharmacist degree can lead to clinical and research roles, with many universities offering coursework online to accommodate working professionals.

Some high school students seek a head start in healthcare with foundational online degrees. Researching the best online schools for high school students with health information management programs can provide early exposure and valuable credentials.

For those interested in medical administration, earning a medical coding certification online offers a quick path to healthcare employment, allowing you to work remotely or in clinical settings. These diverse online options support various career aspirations within medicine and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno H. Stricker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles