World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
5899
World Ranking
11611
National Ranking
4763

Charles E. Kahn publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. Kahn sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 159 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Charles E. Kahn D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. Kahn sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles E. Kahn is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on Medicine, with particular expertise in the subfields of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Health Informatics, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, and Molecular Biology.

Their work spans several specialized topics, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Radiology practices and education
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Medical Imaging and Analysis

Charles E. Kahn has contributed frequently to various publication venues, with a significant number of their papers appearing in:

  • Radiology Artificial Intelligence
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Radiology
  • Journal of the American College of Radiology
  • Studies in health technology and informatics

Their recent papers include the following:

  • "Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers" (2020, Radiology Artificial Intelligence)
  • "Metrics reloaded: recommendations for image analysis validation" (2024, Nature Methods)
  • "Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer imaging" (2022, Communications Medicine)
  • "A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AI" (2021, Nature Medicine)
  • "Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): 2024 Update" (2024, Radiology Artificial Intelligence)

Frequent collaborators of Charles E. Kahn include:

  • Linda Moy
  • Tessa S. Cook
  • Hersh Sagreiya
  • Walter R. Witschey
  • James C. Gee

Best Publications

  • Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers.

    John Mongan;Linda Moy;Charles E. Kahn

  • Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer

    Charles E. Kahn;Linda M. Roberts;Katherine A. Shaffer;Peter Haddawy

  • Automatic segmentation of liver structure in CT images

    Kyongtae T. Bae;Maryellen L. Giger;Chin-Tu Chen;Charles E. Kahn

  • A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies : QUADAS-AI

    Viknesh Sounderajah;Hutan Ashrafian;Sherri Rose;Nigam H. Shah

  • Informatics in radiology: comparison of logistic regression and artificial neural network models in breast cancer risk estimation.

    Turgay Ayer;Jagpreet Chhatwal;Oguzhan Alagoz;Charles E. Kahn

  • Breast cancer risk estimation with artificial neural networks revisited: discrimination and calibration.

    Turgay Ayer;Oguzhan Alagoz;Jagpreet Chhatwal;Jude W. Shavlik

  • Overview of the CLEF 2009 medical image retrieval track

    Henning Müller;Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer;Ivan Eggel;Steven Bedrick

  • To buy or not to buy-evaluating commercial AI solutions in radiology (the ECLAIR guidelines).

    Patrick Omoumi;Alexis Ducarouge;Antoine Tournier;Hugh Harvey

  • Artificial intelligence in radiology: decision support systems.

    Kahn Ce

  • Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol.

    W D Foley;R G Hoffmann;F A Quiroz;C E Kahn

  • Common Data Elements in Radiology.

    Daniel L. Rubin;Charles E. Kahn

  • DICOM and radiology: past, present, and future.

    Charles E. Kahn;John A. Carrino;Michael J. Flynn;Donald J. Peck

  • Probabilistic Computer Model Developed from Clinical Data in National Mammography Database Format to Classify Mammographic Findings

    Elizabeth S. Burnside;Jesse Davis;Jesse Davis;Jagpreet Chhatwal;Oguzhan Alagoz

  • GoldMiner: A Radiology Image Search Engine

    Charles E. Kahn;Cheng Thao

  • Actionable Findings and the Role of IT Support: Report of the ACR Actionable Reporting Work Group

    Paul A. Larson;Lincoln L. Berland;Brent Griffith;Charles E. Kahn

  • A logistic regression model based on the national mammography database format to aid breast cancer diagnosis

    Jagpreet Chhatwal;Oguzhan Alagoz;Mary J. Lindstrom;Charles E. Kahn

  • Why Is the Electronic Health Record So Challenging for Research and Clinical Care

    John H. Holmes;James Beinlich;Mary R. Boland;Kathryn H. Bowles

  • Overview of the CLEF 2010 medical image retrieval track

    Henning Müller;Henning Müller;Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer;Ivan Eggel;Steven Bedrick

  • From Images to Actions: Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Radiology.

    Charles E Kahn

  • Overview of the ImageCLEFmed 2008 medical image retrieval task

    Henning Müller;Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer;Charles E. Kahn;William Hatt

  • How users search and what they search for in the medical domain

    João Palotti;Allan Hanbury;Henning Müller;Charles E. Kahn

  • Health status assessment via the World Wide Web.

    D. S. Bell;C. E. Kahn

Frequent Co-Authors

Henning Müller
Henning Müller University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Peter Haddawy
Peter Haddawy Mahidol University
Daniel L. Rubin
Daniel L. Rubin Stanford University
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer Harvard University
William R. Hersh
William R. Hersh Oregon Health & Science University
Maryellen L. Giger
Maryellen L. Giger University of Chicago
Mitchell D. Schnall
Mitchell D. Schnall University of Pennsylvania
Ben Glocker
Ben Glocker Imperial College London
Lena Maier-Hein
Lena Maier-Hein German Cancer Research Center
Ronald M. Summers
Ronald M. Summers National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA offers a wide range of online degree options to suit different needs and backgrounds. For those starting their academic journey, online associate degree programs provide a flexible and cost-effective introduction to computer science concepts. These programs can help students quickly build foundational skills and transition into a bachelor’s degree or entry-level tech roles.

Affordability is often a major concern for students. Exploring the cheapest online degrees can help lower the financial barrier while still providing quality education. Additionally, some students may worry about past academic performance. Fortunately, there are college that accepts low gpa, making higher education accessible to a wider range of applicants.

Computer Science skills pave the way for versatile careers—not only in tech but in interdisciplinary fields. For example, if your interests also lie in sustainability, consider what you can achieve with an environmental science degree. Combining expertise opens doors in emerging industries and broadens your career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Charles E. Kahn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles