World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
81
Citations
24043
World Ranking
1033
National Ranking
551

William R. Hersh publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Hersh sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 400 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

William R. Hersh D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Hersh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

William R. Hersh is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Computer Science, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine.

Their notable areas of study include Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Health Information Management, Health Informatics, and Information Systems. Key topics within their research portfolio cover Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Topic Modeling, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, Electronic Health Records Systems, Biomedical and Engineering Education, Health Sciences Research and Education, and Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders.

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • TREC-COVID: rationale and structure of an information retrieval shared task for COVID-19, 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • TREC-COVID, 2020, ACM SIGIR Forum
  • Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics: Second Revision, 2022, International Journal of Medical Informatics
  • Detecting rare diseases in electronic health records using machine learning and knowledge engineering: Case study of acute hepatic porphyria, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • TREC-COVID: Constructing a Pandemic Information Retrieval Test Collection, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

William R. Hersh frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Steven Bedrick, Kirk Roberts, Dina Demner-Fushman, Ian Soboroff, and Aaron Cohen.

Their work is often published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Yearbook of Medical Informatics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • ACM SIGIR Forum

William R. Hersh has also contributed to book publications, including the title Information Retrieval: A Biomedical and Health Perspective published by Health Informatics in 2020.

In recognition of their contributions, they have received the 2018 Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) award.

Best Publications

  • OHSUMED: an interactive retrieval evaluation and new large test collection for research

    William Hersh;Chris Buckley;T. J. Leone;David Hickam

  • A survey of current work in biomedical text mining

    Aaron M. Cohen;William R. Hersh

  • Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval

    William Hersh;Jamie Callan;Yoelle Maarek;Mark Sanderson

  • Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics - First Revision

    J. Mantas;E. Ammenwerth;G. Demiris;A. Hasman

  • Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.

    William R. Hersh;Mark G. Weiner;Peter J. Embi;Judith R. Logan

  • Information Retrieval: A Health and Biomedical Perspective

    William R. Hersh

  • TREC 2006 genomics track overview

    William R. Hersh;Aaron M. Cohen;Phoebe M. Roberts;Hari Krishna Rekapalli

  • TREC Genomics Track Overview

    William R. Hersh;Ravi Teja Bhupatiraju

  • Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics

    John Mantas;Elske Ammenwerth;George Demiris;Arie Hasman

  • Reducing workload in systematic review preparation using automated citation classification.

    Aaron M. Cohen;William R. Hersh;K. Peterson;Po-Yin Yen

  • Computerized Physician Order Entry in U.S. Hospitals: Results of a 2002 Survey

    Joan S. Ash;Paul N. Gorman;Veena Seshadri;William R. Hersh

  • Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved

    Holly Jimison;Paul Gorman;Susan Woods;Peggy Nygren

  • A categorization and analysis of the criticisms of Evidence-Based Medicine

    Aaron Michael Cohen;P.Zoë Stavri;William R. Hersh

  • Medical informatics: improving health care through information.

    William R. Hersh

  • How Well Do Physicians Use Electronic Information Retrieval Systems?: A Framework for Investigation and Systematic Review

    William R. Hersh;David H. Hickam;David H. Hickam

  • Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review

    William R. Hersh;Mark Helfand;James Wallace;Dale Kraemer

  • A stimulus to define informatics and health information technology.

    William R. Hersh

  • TREC 2004 Genomics Track Overview

    William R. Hersh;Ravi Teja Bhuptiraju;Laura Ross;Phoebe Johnson

  • Health Care Information Technology Progress and Barriers

    William Hersh

  • The CLEF 2005 cross–language image retrieval track

    Paul Clough;Henning Müller;Thomas Deselaers;Michael Grubinger

  • TREC 2007 genomics track overview

    William R. Hersh;Aaron M. Cohen;Lynn Ruslen;Phoebe M. Roberts

Frequent Co-Authors

Henning Müller
Henning Müller University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer Harvard University
Ellen M. Voorhees
Ellen M. Voorhees National Institute of Standards and Technology
Dina Demner-Fushman
Dina Demner-Fushman National Institutes of Health
Sijia Liu
Sijia Liu Michigan State University
Hongfang Liu
Hongfang Liu The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Elmer V. Bernstam
Elmer V. Bernstam The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Paul Over
Paul Over National Institute of Standards and Technology
Andrew Turpin
Andrew Turpin University of Melbourne
Thomas Deselaers
Thomas Deselaers Apple (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA opens many doors, but there are also related online programs that can help diversify your skill set or complement your career goals. Many students explore affordable online executive mba programs to blend technical knowledge with business leadership, enhancing opportunities in tech management roles.

For those interested in organizing and managing information, a mlis degree (Master of Library and Information Science) can be a great complement to a background in computing, especially in fields like data science, archiving, or digital libraries.

If you’re considering graduate study, exploring affordable graduate schools can help you find high-quality education without the burden of excessive debt. These programs often let you specialize further or pivot into related areas.

For those aiming for top leadership or academic roles in technology, a doctorate in organizational leadership online provides advanced expertise in steering organizations, leading change, and shaping the future of tech-driven institutions.

Best Scientists Citing William R. Hersh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles