World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
8895
World Ranking
11915
National Ranking
4864

Paul Over publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Over sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 79 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Paul Over D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Over sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Over is affiliated with the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the United States. Their recent research primarily focuses on quantum computing algorithms and related applications in physics and engineering.

The scientist has contributed to publications in several notable venues, with a concentration in journals and preprint archives relevant to computational fluid dynamics and quantum technologies.

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computers & Fluids
  • AIAA Journal

Paul Over's recent papers include:

  • Boundary treatment for variational quantum simulations of partial differential equations on quantum computers (2024, Computers & Fluids)
  • Quantum Algorithm for the Advection-Diffusion Equation by Direct Block Encoding of the Time-Marching Operator (2024, arXiv (Cornell University))

They have frequently co-authored papers with the following researchers:

  • Sergio Bengoechea
  • Thomas Rung
  • Dieter Jaksch
  • Francesco Clerici
  • Leonardo Scandurra

Paul Over's research spans multiple topics within quantum science and physics, particularly focusing on computational techniques and quantum information:

  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics

Subfields that describe their work include artificial intelligence and statistical and nonlinear physics, indicating an interdisciplinary approach combining computational models with physical phenomena.

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Best Publications

  • Evaluation campaigns and TRECVid

    Alan F. Smeaton;Paul Over;Wessel Kraaij

  • TRECVID 2011 - An overview of the goals, tasks, data, evaluation mechanisms, and metrics

    P. Over;G. Awad;J. Fiscus;B. Antonishek

  • TRECVID 2012 - An overview of the goals, tasks, data, evaluation mechanisms, and metrics

    P. Over;J. Fiscus;G. Sanders;B. Shaw

  • TRECVID 2014 - An Overview of the Goals, Tasks, Data, Evaluation Mechanisms, and Metrics

    Paul Over;Jon Fiscus;Gregory A. Sanders;David Joy

  • TRECVID 2013 -- An Overview of the Goals, Tasks, Data, Evaluation Mechanisms, and Metrics | NIST

    Paul D. Over;Jonathan G. Fiscus;Gregory A. Sanders;David M. Joy

  • TRECVID 2013 -- An Overview of the Goals, Tasks, Data, Evaluation Mechanisms and Metrics

    P. Over;J. Fiscus;G. Sanders;M. Michel

  • Video shot boundary detection: Seven years of TRECVid activity

    Alan F. Smeaton;Paul Over;Aiden R. Doherty

  • High-level feature detection from video in TRECVid: a 5-year retrospective of achievements

    Alan F. Smeaton;Paul Over;Wessel Kraaij

  • DUC in context

    Paul Over;Hoa Dang;Donna Harman

  • TRECVID 2005 - An Overview

    Paul Over;Tzveta Ianeva;Wessel Kraaij;Alan F. Smeaton

  • The trecvid 2007 BBC rushes summarization evaluation pilot

    Paul Over;Alan F. Smeaton;Philip Kelly

  • TRECVID 2013 ― An Overview of the Goals, Tasks, Data, Evaluation Mechanisms and Metrics

    Paul Over;George Awad;Jonathan Fiscus;Greg Sanders

  • Blind Men and Elephants: Six Approaches to TREC data

    David Banks;Paul Over;Nien-Fan Zhang

  • The trecvid 2008 BBC rushes summarization evaluation

    Paul Over;Alan F. Smeaton;George Awad

  • Comparing interactive information retrieval systems across sites: the TREC-6 interactive track matrix experiment

    Eric Lagergren;Paul Over

  • The TREC interactive track: an annotated bibliography

    Paul Over

  • TRECVID 2009 - Goals, Tasks, Data, Evaluation Mechanisms and Metrics.

    Paul Over;George Awad;Jonathan G. Fiscus;Martial Michel

  • TRECVID: evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval tasks on digital video

    Alan F. Smeaton;Paul Over;Wessel Kraaij

  • The TREC-2002 Video Track Report.

    Alan F. Smeaton;Paul Over

  • TRECVID 2010 - An Overview of the Goals, Tasks, Data, Evaluation Mechanisms and Metrics

    Paul D. Over;George M. Awad;Jonathan G. Fiscus;Brian Antonishek

  • TRECVID 2010 ― An Overview of the Goals, Tasks, Data, Evaluation Mechanisms and Metrics

    Paul Over;George Awad;Jonathan Fiscus;Brian Antonishek

  • TREC-6 Interactive Track Report

    Paul D. Over

  • TRECVID 2008 -- Goals, Tasks, Data, Evaluation Mechanisms and Metrics

    Paul Over;George Awad;R. Travis Rose;Jonathan G. Fiscus

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan F. Smeaton
Alan F. Smeaton Dublin City University
Wessel Kraaij
Wessel Kraaij Leiden University
William R. Hersh
William R. Hersh Oregon Health & Science University
Donna Harman
Donna Harman National Institute of Standards and Technology
John S. Garofolo
John S. Garofolo National Institute of Standards and Technology
David Doermann
David Doermann University at Buffalo, State University of New York
John R. Smith
John R. Smith IBM (United States)
Alexander G. Hauptmann
Alexander G. Hauptmann Carnegie Mellon University
Marko Grobelnik
Marko Grobelnik Jožef Stefan Institute
Aiden R. Doherty
Aiden R. Doherty University of Oxford

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online pathways to a Computer Science degree in the USA offers flexibility, affordability, and diverse career options. Many students consider the cheapest online colleges to help manage tuition costs while still gaining a quality education.

Worried about academic eligibility? There are also best colleges for low gpa candidates, making it possible to pursue a tech career even if your grades aren’t perfect.

For those eager to start working sooner, consider the fastest computer science degree options online—these programs let motivated learners graduate quickly and efficiently.

Finally, don’t overlook interdisciplinary careers. If you have interests in other fields, you might explore roles highlighted in jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree, as tech skills are valuable across a wide range of sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Over

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles