World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
71
Citations
25705
World Ranking
1750
National Ranking
16

Cees G. M. Snoek publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cees G. M. Snoek sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 361 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Cees G. M. Snoek D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cees G. M. Snoek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2011 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Cees G. M. Snoek is a researcher affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their work primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a specialization in areas related to computer vision and machine learning.

The main fields of study for their research include:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Signal Processing

Their research focuses notably on several topics, which include:

  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Frequent collaborators with whom they have published include:

  • Pascal Mettes
  • Xiantong Zhen
  • Hazel Doughty
  • Ling Shao
  • Efstratios Gavves

The venues where this researcher has published frequently are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • International Journal of Computer Vision
  • ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications
  • 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Cees G. M. Snoek are:

  • TubeR: Tubelet Transformer for Video Action Detection, 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • On Measuring and Controlling the Spectral Bias of the Deep Image Prior, 2022, International Journal of Computer Vision
  • BoxeR: Box-Attention for 2D and 3D Transformers, 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • Latent Embedding Feedback and Discriminative Features for Zero-Shot Classification, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Shuffled ImageNet Banks for Video Event Detection and Search, 2020, ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications

Cees G. M. Snoek holds the distinction of being an ACM Senior Member since 2011.

Best Publications

  • Evaluating Color Descriptors for Object and Scene Recognition

    Koen E A van de Sande;T Gevers;Cees G M Snoek

  • Evaluation of color descriptors for object and scene recognition

    K. van de Sande;T. Gevers;C. Snoek

  • Early versus late fusion in semantic video analysis

    Cees G. M. Snoek;Marcel Worring;Arnold W. M. Smeulders

  • The challenge problem for automated detection of 101 semantic concepts in multimedia

    Cees G. M. Snoek;Marcel Worring;Jan C. van Gemert;Jan-Mark Geusebroek

  • Multimodal Video Indexing: A Review of the State-of-the-art

    Cees G. M. Snoek;Marcel Worring

  • VideoLSTM convolves, attends and flows for action recognition

    Zhenyang Li;Kirill Gavrilyuk;Efstratios Gavves;Mihir Jain;Mihir Jain

  • Learning Social Tag Relevance by Neighbor Voting

    Xirong Li;C.G.M. Snoek;M. Worring

  • Concept-Based Video Retrieval

    Cees G. M. Snoek;Marcel Worring

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2009 Semantic Video Search Engine

    C.G.M. Snoek;K.E.A. van de Sande;O. de Rooij;B. Huurnink

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2008 Semantic Video Search Engine

    C.G.M. Snoek;K.E.A. van de Sande;O. de Rooij;B. Huurnink

  • NIST Special Publication

    C.G.M. Snoek;M. Worring;J.M. Geusebroek;D.C. Koelma

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2006 semantic video search engine

    C.G.M. Snoek;J.C. van Gemert;T. Gevers;B. Huurnink

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2011 Semantic Video Search Engine

    C. G. M. Snoek;K. E. A. van de Sande;X. Li;M. Mazloom

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2012 semantic video search engine

    C.G.M. Snoek;K.E.A. van de Sande;A. Habibian;S. Kordumova

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2007 Semantic Video Search Engine

    C. Snoek;I. Everts;van J.C. Gemert;Jan-Mark Geusebroek

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2010 semantic video search engine

    C.G.M. Snoek;K.E.A. van de Sande;O. de Rooij;B. Huurnink

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2004 Semantic Video Search Engine

    C. G. M. Snoek;M. Worring;J. M. Geusebroek;D. C. Koelma

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2005 Semantic Video Search Engine

    C. Snoek;van J.C. Gemert;Jan-Mark Geusebroek;B. Huurnink

  • Action Localization with Tubelets from Motion

    Mihir Jain;Jan van Gemert;Hervé Jégou;Patrick Bouthemy

  • VideoLSTM Convolves, Attends and Flows for Action Recognition

    Zhenyang Li;Efstratios Gavves;Mihir Jain;Cees G. M. Snoek

  • Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference

    Alan Hanjalic;Cees Snoek;Marcel Worring;Dick Bulterman

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcel Worring
Marcel Worring University of Amsterdam
Arnold W. M. Smeulders
Arnold W. M. Smeulders University of Amsterdam
Xirong Li
Xirong Li Renmin University of China
Efstratios Gavves
Efstratios Gavves University of Amsterdam
Jan C. van Gemert
Jan C. van Gemert Delft University of Technology
Jan-Mark Geusebroek
Jan-Mark Geusebroek University of Amsterdam
Theo Gevers
Theo Gevers University of Amsterdam
Nicu Sebe
Nicu Sebe University of Trento
Hervé Jégou
Hervé Jégou Facebook (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for tech-savvy professionals grows, many students seek alternative routes to expand their skills and advance their careers. Online learning offers flexible options to pursue degrees related to Computer Science, no matter where you are located.

For those seeking affordability, exploring the cheapest bachelor degree online programs can help minimize student debt while building a strong foundation. Aspiring engineers might consider earning their engineering degree online, which covers valuable technology and problem-solving skills relevant to many industries.

Career advancement is possible with specialized postgraduate programs. Working professionals interested in leadership may benefit from an emba online, giving them deeper business knowledge with the flexibility to continue working. Additionally, those passionate about information management or digital services should explore a library sciences degree to open doors to careers in digital libraries, archives, and knowledge management.

Considering these online pathways can help you tailor your education, save on tuition, and access dynamic career options in the evolving digital landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Cees G. M. Snoek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles