World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
4937
World Ranking
8613
National Ranking
228

Freek van Ede publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Freek van Ede sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 72 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Freek van Ede D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Freek van Ede sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Freek van Ede is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of Neuroscience, with a substantial focus on Cognitive Neuroscience as a subfield. Additional areas of study include Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, Human-Computer Interaction, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, among which are:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection

Freek van Ede has published research in a range of venues, with the most frequent publication outlets including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Vision
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Cognition

The scientist has authored papers that address various aspects of working memory, attention, and visual processing. Notable recent publications include:

  • Turning Attention Inside Out: How Working Memory Serves Behavior, 2022, Annual Review of Psychology
  • Functional but not obligatory link between microsaccades and neural modulation by covert spatial attention, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Goal-directed and stimulus-driven selection of internal representations, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Output planning at the input stage in visual working memory, 2021, Science Advances
  • Visual working memory and action: Functional links and bi-directional influences, 2020, Visual Cognition

Freek van Ede frequently collaborates with other researchers, with multiple co-authors across their publications. These frequent co-authors include:

  • Anna C. Nobre
  • Sage Boettcher
  • Baiwei Liu
  • Daniela Gresch
  • Mark G. Stokes

The research contributions of Freek van Ede reflect a multidisciplinary approach integrating cognitive neuroscience and experimental psychology methodologies. Their work addresses mechanisms underlying attention, working memory, and the interplay between visual processing and motor planning.

Best Publications

  • Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention.

    A C Nobre;F van Ede

  • Prior Expectation Mediates Neural Adaptation to Repeated Sounds in the Auditory Cortex: An MEG Study

    A. Todorovic;F.L. van Ede;E.G.G. Maris;F.P. de Lange

  • Orienting attention to an upcoming tactile event involves a spatially and temporally specific modulation of sensorimotor alpha- and beta-band oscillations.

    F.L. van Ede;F.P. de Lange;O. Jensen;E.G.G. Maris

  • Neural Oscillations: Sustained Rhythms or Transient Burst-Events?

    Freek van Ede;Andrew J. Quinn;Mark W. Woolrich;Anna C. Nobre

  • Human gaze tracks attentional focusing in memorized visual space.

    Freek van Ede;Sammi R Chekroud;Anna C Nobre

  • Tactile expectation modulates pre-stimulus beta-band oscillations in human sensorimotor cortex.

    F.L. van Ede;O. Jensen;E.G.G. Maris

  • Concurrent visual and motor selection during visual working memory guided action.

    Freek van Ede;Sammi R. Chekroud;Mark G. Stokes;Anna C. Nobre

  • Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations.

    F van Ede;M Niklaus;A C Nobre

  • Driving Human Motor Cortical Oscillations Leads to Behaviorally Relevant Changes in Local GABAA Inhibition: A tACS-TMS Study.

    M Nowak;E Hinson;F van Ede;A Pogosyan

  • Attentional cues affect accuracy and reaction time via different cognitive and neural processes.

    F.L. van Ede;F.P. de Lange;E.G.G. Maris

  • Diverse Phase Relations among Neuronal Rhythms and Their Potential Function.

    E.G.G. Maris;P. Fries;F.L. van Ede;F.L. van Ede

  • Attentional modulations of somatosensory alpha, beta and gamma oscillations dissociate between anticipation and stimulus processing

    F.L. van Ede;S. Szebenyi;E.G.G. Maris

  • Mnemonic and attentional roles for states of attenuated alpha oscillations in perceptual working memory: a review.

    Freek van Ede

  • Goal-directed and stimulus-driven selection of internal representations.

    Freek Van Ede;Freek Van Ede;Alexander G. Board;Anna C. Nobre

  • Temporal expectation and attention jointly modulate auditory oscillatory activity in the beta band.

    Ana Todorovic;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Freek van Ede;Eric Maris

  • Output planning at the input stage in visual working memory

    Sage E. P. Boettcher;Daniela Gresch;Daniela Gresch;Anna C. Nobre;Freek van Ede;Freek van Ede

  • Decoding the influence of anticipatory states on visual perception in the presence of temporal distractors.

    Freek van Ede;Sammi R. Chekroud;Mark G. Stokes;Anna C. Nobre

  • Visual working memory and action: Functional links and bi-directional influences.

    Freek van Ede

  • Decoding visual colour from scalp electroencephalography measurements.

    Jasper E. Hajonides;Anna Christina Nobre;Freek van Ede;Freek van Ede;Mark G. Stokes

  • Joint action modulates motor system involvement during action observation in 3-year-olds.

    Marlene Meyer;Sabine Hunnius;Michiel van Elk;Michiel van Elk;Freek van Ede

  • Beyond establishing involvement: quantifying the contribution of anticipatory α- and β-band suppression to perceptual improvement with attention.

    F.L. van Ede;M. Köster;E.G.G. Maris

  • P215 Driving human motor cortical oscillations leads to behaviourally relevant changes in local GABA(A) Inhibition: A tACS-TMS study

    Magdalena Nowak;Emily Hinson;Freek Van Ede;Alek Pogosyan

  • Data from: Concurrent visual and motor selection during visual working memory guided action

    Freek van Ede;Sammi R. Chekroud;Mark G. Stokes;Anna C. Nobre

Frequent Co-Authors

Anna C. Nobre
Anna C. Nobre Yale University
Mark G. Stokes
Mark G. Stokes University of Oxford
Mark W. Woolrich
Mark W. Woolrich University of Oxford
Ole Jensen
Ole Jensen University of Oxford
Alek Pogosyan
Alek Pogosyan University of Oxford
Charlotte J. Stagg
Charlotte J. Stagg University of Oxford
Peter Brown
Peter Brown University of Oxford
Michiel van Elk
Michiel van Elk Leiden University Medical Center
Floris P. de Lange
Floris P. de Lange Radboud University
Sabine Hunnius
Sabine Hunnius Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your neuroscience education with online programs opens up multiple career paths in healthcare, research, and therapy. Many students seeking to boost employability and income consider online certificate programs, which offer flexible, targeted training in specific areas of neuroscience or related fields. These certificates can be completed quickly and can lead to well-paying roles in healthcare technology, clinical support, and more.

If balancing studies with other commitments is a concern, explore one of the easiest college majors online. Some programs offer lighter coursework or more accessible entry requirements, helping you gain a foundational understanding of the brain and behavior without overwhelming workloads.

For those interested in therapy or social work, look into the most affordable MSW programs online. These programs are ideal for careers in mental health services, counseling, and community outreach, and provide a cost-effective path to a professional license.

Aspiring behavior analysts should consider the bcba degree, which can lead to rewarding positions working with individuals who have developmental or behavioral challenges. Affordable online options make it easier to advance your career without excessive financial burden.

Best Scientists Citing Freek van Ede

Trending Scientists