World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Floris P. de Lange

Floris P. de Lange

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
77
Citations
21618
World Ranking
1836
National Ranking
60

Floris P. de Lange publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Floris P. de Lange sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 227 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Floris P. de Lange D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Floris P. de Lange sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Floris P. de Lange is a researcher affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands, focused primarily on the field of neuroscience. Their work extensively covers cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, social psychology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The scientist's research encompasses a variety of topics, including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Face recognition and perception
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Memory and neural mechanisms

Prominent recent publications include:

  • "A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension" (2022) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception" (2020) published in eLife
  • "An adversarial collaboration to critically evaluate theories of consciousness" (2023) published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "An adversarial collaboration protocol for testing contrasting predictions of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theory" (2023) published in PLoS ONE
  • "Why so curious? Quantifying mechanisms of information seeking" (2020) published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Frequent collaborators working alongside Floris P. de Lange include Eelke Spaak, David Richter, Micha Heilbron, Matthias Fritsche, and Marius V. Peelen.

The scientist's research is often published in well-regarded venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Vision
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University)
  • eLife
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • How Do Expectations Shape Perception

    Floris P. de Lange;Micha Heilbron;Peter Kok

  • Less Is More: Expectation Sharpens Representations in the Primary Visual Cortex

    Peter Kok;Janneke F.M. Jehee;Floris P. de Lange

  • Expectation in perceptual decision making: neural and computational mechanisms

    Christopher Summerfield;Floris P. de Lange

  • Shared representations for working memory and mental imagery in early visual cortex

    Anke Marit Albers;Peter Kok;Ivan Toni;H. Chris Dijkerman

  • Attention Reverses the Effect of Prediction in Silencing Sensory Signals

    Peter Kok;Dobromir Rahnev;Dobromir Rahnev;Janneke F. M. Jehee;Hakwan C. Lau;Hakwan C. Lau

  • How prediction errors shape perception, attention, and motivation.

    Hanneke E. M. den Ouden;Hanneke E. M. den Ouden;Peter Kok;Floris P. de Lange

  • Prior Expectation Mediates Neural Adaptation to Repeated Sounds in the Auditory Cortex: An MEG Study

    A. Todorovic;F.L. van Ede;E.G.G. Maris;F.P. de Lange

  • Opposite Effects of Recent History on Perception and Decision.

    Matthias Fritsche;Pim Mostert;Floris P. de Lange

  • Selective Activation of the Deep Layers of the Human Primary Visual Cortex by Top-Down Feedback

    Peter Kok;Lauren J. Bains;Lauren J. Bains;Tim van Mourik;David G. Norris;David G. Norris;David G. Norris

  • Complementary systems for understanding action intentions

    Floris P. de Lange;Marjolein Spronk;Roel M. Willems;Ivan Toni

  • Prior expectations induce prestimulus sensory templates.

    Peter Kok;Peter Kok;Peter Kok;Pim Mostert;Floris P de Lange

  • Local Entrainment of Alpha Oscillations by Visual Stimuli Causes Cyclic Modulation of Perception

    E. Spaak;F.P. de Lange;O. Jensen

  • Orienting attention to an upcoming tactile event involves a spatially and temporally specific modulation of sensorimotor alpha- and beta-band oscillations.

    F.L. van Ede;F.P. de Lange;O. Jensen;E.G.G. Maris

  • Repetition Suppression and Expectation Suppression Are Dissociable in Time in Early Auditory Evoked Fields

    Ana Todorovic;Floris P. de Lange

  • Anatomical coupling between distinct metacognitive systems for memory and visual perception.

    Li Yan McCurdy;Brian Maniscalco;Janet Metcalfe;Ka Yuet Liu

  • Prior expectations evoke stimulus templates in the primary visual cortex

    Peter Kok;Michel F. Failing;Floris P. de Lange

  • Posture influences motor imagery: an fMRI study.

    Floris P. de Lange;Rick C. Helmich;Rick C. Helmich;Ivan Toni;Ivan Toni

  • Prestimulus oscillatory activity over motor cortex reflects perceptual expectations.

    F.P. de Lange;D.A. Rahnev;D.A. Rahnev;T.H. Donner;H. Lau;H. Lau

  • Motor imagery in mental rotation: an fMRI study.

    Guy Vingerhoets;Floris P. de Lange;Pieter Vandemaele;Karel Deblaere

  • Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception

    Dobromir Rahnev;Brian Maniscalco;Tashina Graves;Tashina Graves;Elliott Huang

  • Interactions between posterior gamma and frontal alpha/beta oscillations during imagined actions

    Floris P De Lange;Ole Jensen;Markus Bauer;Ivan Toni

Frequent Co-Authors

Ivan Toni
Ivan Toni Radboud University
Hakwan Lau
Hakwan Lau Sungkyunkwan University
Simon van Gaal
Simon van Gaal University of Amsterdam
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
David G. Norris
David G. Norris Radboud University
Jos W. M. van der Meer
Jos W. M. van der Meer Radboud University Medical Center
Marcel A. J. van Gerven
Marcel A. J. van Gerven Radboud University
Stanislas Dehaene
Stanislas Dehaene Collège de France
Harold Bekkering
Harold Bekkering Radboud University
Karin Roelofs
Karin Roelofs Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Floris P. de Lange

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles