World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel Vanderpooten

Daniel Vanderpooten

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
30
Citations
4849
World Ranking
3463
National Ranking
209

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
5175
World Ranking
13508
National Ranking
353

Daniel Vanderpooten publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Vanderpooten sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 111 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Daniel Vanderpooten D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Vanderpooten sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Vanderpooten is affiliated with Paris Dauphine University in France. Their research falls within the broad domain of Computer Science, with a primary focus on Computational Theory and Mathematics. Several subfields are also part of their work, including Numerical Analysis, Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's investigations emphasize advanced aspects of optimization, addressing multiple topics such as:

  • Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Optimization and Variational Analysis
  • Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions

Several papers document their recent contributions, including:

  • "Enumeration of the Nondominated Set of Multiobjective Discrete Optimization Problems," 2020, INFORMS Journal on Computing
  • "Exact and approximate determination of the Pareto front using Minimal Correction Subsets," 2023, Computers & Operations Research
  • "An approximation algorithm for a general class of parametric optimization problems," 2020, Journal of Combinatorial Optimization
  • "The Power of the Weighted Sum Scalarization for Approximating Multiobjective Optimization Problems," 2021, Theory of Computing Systems
  • "Computing efficiently the nondominated subset of a set sum," 2022, International Transactions in Operational Research

Collaborations form an integral part of their research output. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Cristina Bazgan
  • Clemens Thielen
  • Stefan Ruzika
  • Arne Herzel
  • Satya Tamby

Daniel Vanderpooten has published in various academic venues, with a notable presence in:

  • Computers & Operations Research
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • INFORMS Journal on Computing
  • International Transactions in Operational Research
  • Journal of Combinatorial Optimization

The profile of Daniel Vanderpooten illustrates a focus on both theoretical and applied dimensions of computer science, particularly in optimization and multi-objective algorithmic research. Their work demonstrates interdisciplinary reach, extending into aspects of electrical engineering and artificial intelligence as related to optimization problems.

Best Publications

  • A generalized definition of rough approximations based on similarity

    R. Slowinski;D. Vanderpooten

  • Min–max and min–max regret versions of combinatorial optimization problems: A survey

    Hassene Aissi;Cristina Bazgan;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • The European school of MCDA: Emergence, basic features and current works

    Bernard Roy;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • Solving efficiently the 0-1 multi-objective knapsack problem

    Cristina Bazgan;Hadrien Hugot;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • Enumeration and interactive selection of efficient paths in a multiple criteria graph for scheduling an earth observing satellite

    Virginie Gabrel;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • An outranking approach for rank aggregation in information retrieval

    Mohamed Farah;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • Induction of decision rules in classification and discovery-oriented perspectives

    Jerzy Stefanowski;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • Description and analysis of some representative interactive multicriteria procedures

    Daniel Vanderpooten;Philippe Vincke

  • Complexity of the min-max and min-max regret assignment problems

    Hassene Aissi;Cristina Bazgan;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • On the representation of the search region in multi-objective optimization

    Kathrin Klamroth;Renaud Lacour;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • Ranking projects for an electricity utility using ELECTRE III

    John Buchanan;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • The interactive approach in MCDA: A technical framework and some basic conceptions

    Daniel Vanderpooten

  • Weighted sum model with partial preference information: Application to multi-objective optimization

    Sami Kaddani;Sami Kaddani;Daniel Vanderpooten;Jean Michel Vanpeperstraete;Hassene Aissi

  • Aiding decisions with multiple criteria: essays in honor of Bernard Roy

    Denis Bouyssou;Eric Jacquet-Lagrèze;Patrice Perny;Roman Słowiński

  • The Construction of Prescriptions in Outranking Methods

    Daniel Vanderpooten

  • An overview on “The European school of MCDA: Emergence, basic features and current works”

    Bernard Roy;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • Approximation of min–max and min–max regret versions of some combinatorial optimization problems

    Hassene Aissi;Cristina Bazgan;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • Construction of rule-based assignment models

    Riad Azibi;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • The satisfactory partition problem

    Cristina Bazgan;Zsolt Tuza;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • Integrated micro-economic modelling and multi-criteria methodology to support public decision-making: the case of liquid bio-fuels in France

    Stelios Rozakis;Jean-Claude Sourie;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • A multi-criteria model for electronic auctions

    Marie-Jo Bellosta;Imène Brigui;Sylvie Kornman;Daniel Vanderpooten

  • Discrete Optimization Enumeration and interactive selection of efficient paths in a multiple criteria graph for scheduling an earth observing satellite

    Virginie Gabrel;Daniel Vanderpooten

Frequent Co-Authors

Zsolt Tuza
Zsolt Tuza University of Pannonia
Roman Słowiński
Roman Słowiński Poznań University of Technology
Bernard Roy
Bernard Roy Paris Dauphine University
Jerzy Stefanowski
Jerzy Stefanowski Poznań University of Technology
Kathrin Klamroth
Kathrin Klamroth University of Wuppertal
José Rui Figueira
José Rui Figueira Instituto Superior Técnico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals combine their analytical background with business skills by enrolling in accelerated programs like the best 1 year mba programs. These programs allow for efficient skill-building, perfect for those looking to enter leadership roles swiftly.

Flexibility is key, and many students appreciate options where they can you transfer mba credits. Being able to transfer credits minimizes redundancy and saves time when pursuing advanced degrees, making it easier to tailor education to individual goals.

Another related field with strong growth potential is data science. An ms in data analytics can complement math expertise by providing practical skills for interpreting complex data sets, which are highly sought after in various industries.

For those prioritizing accessibility, some programs offer the easiest mba specialization. These can be ideal for math graduates seeking business acumen without the intense competitive admissions process, helping them enhance career prospects efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Vanderpooten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles