World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Benedetto Matarazzo

Benedetto Matarazzo

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
10717
World Ranking
6753
National Ranking
165

Benedetto Matarazzo publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benedetto Matarazzo sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 111 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Benedetto Matarazzo D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benedetto Matarazzo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Benedetto Matarazzo is affiliated with the University of Catania in Italy and has conducted research primarily in the fields of Computer Science, Environmental Science, and Decision Sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Chemistry, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

The research topics most frequently addressed by Matarazzo include Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis, Soil and Land Suitability Analysis, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms, and Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications.

Their publication record includes papers in various scientific journals, demonstrating engagement with interdisciplinary themes. Recent works include:

  • "Sustainable Use and Conservation of the Environmental Resources of the Etna Park (UNESCO Heritage): Evaluation Model Supporting Sustainable Local Development Strategies," 2020, Sustainability
  • "Explainable interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization," 2023, Omega
  • "Jaap Spronk (1949 - 2021)," 2021, European Journal of Operational Research

Matarazzo has collaborated with several researchers, with notable frequent co-authors including Salvatore Greco, Roman Słowiński, Luisa Sturiale, Alessandro Scuderi, and Giuseppe Timpanaro. These collaborations suggest a strong involvement in multi-disciplinary and multi-author research projects.

They have contributed to top publication venues such as Sustainability, Omega, and the European Journal of Operational Research, indicating active participation in journals that cover environmental sustainability, optimization methods, and operational research.

Best Publications

  • Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Slowinski

  • Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Slowinski

  • Rough approximation by dominance relations

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Slowinski

  • Rough sets methodology for sorting problems in presence of multiple attributes and criteria

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Slowinski

  • Fuzzy Similarity Relation as a Basis for Rough Approximations

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Slowinski

  • The Use of Rough Sets and Fuzzy Sets in MCDM

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Slowinski

  • A New Rough Set Approach to Evaluation of Bankruptcy Risk

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Slowinski

  • Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral

    Silvia Angilella;Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo

  • Variable Consistency Model of Dominance-Based Rough Sets Approach

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Slowinski;Jerzy Stefanowski

  • An Algorithm for Induction of Decision Rules Consistent with the Dominance Principle

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Slowinski;Jerzy Stefanowski

  • Decision Rule Approach

    Salvatore Greco;Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Słowiński;Roman Słowiński

  • A New Rough Set Approach to Multicriteria and Multiattribute Classification

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Slowinski

  • Assessing non-additive utility for multicriteria decision aid

    Silvia Angilella;Salvatore Greco;Fabio Lamantia;Benedetto Matarazzo

  • Rough Set Based Decision Support

    Roman Słowiński;Salvatore Greco;Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo

  • Axiomatization of utility, outranking and decision-rule preference models for multiple-criteria classification problems under partial inconsistency with the dominance principle

    R. Slowinski;Salvatore Greco;B. Matarazzo

  • Axiomatic characterization of a general utility function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and rough-set decision rules

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Słowiński;Roman Słowiński

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Methods and Applications: Selected Readings of the First International Summer School Acireale, Sicily, September 1983

    G. Fandel;Jaap Spronk;Benedetto Matarazzo

  • Rough sets in decision making

    Roman Slowinski;Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo

  • Handling Missing Values in Rough Set Analysis of Multi-Attribute and Multi-Criteria Decision Problems

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Slowinski

  • Parameterized rough set model using rough membership and Bayesian confirmation measures

    Salvatore Greco;Benedetto Matarazzo;Roman Słowiński

Frequent Co-Authors

Salvatore Greco
Salvatore Greco University of Portsmouth
Roman Słowiński
Roman Słowiński Poznań University of Technology
Ronald R. Yager
Ronald R. Yager Iona University
Jerzy Stefanowski
Jerzy Stefanowski Poznań University of Technology
Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier
Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier Sorbonne University
Alessio Ishizaka
Alessio Ishizaka NEOMA Business School
Peter Nijkamp
Peter Nijkamp Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can help Computer Science students in the USA expand their career options. Many are now choosing specialized fields such as data science programs, which offer a blend of computer science, math, and analytics skills in high demand by employers.

Another popular pathway is pursuing an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering. This degree is ideal for those interested in hardware, electronics, or technical infrastructure roles.

For quicker entry into the technology workforce, consider earning easy licenses and certifications to get. These certifications focus on practical skills and can boost employability in a short amount of time.

If you’re aiming for rapid career advancement, take a look at some of the shortest master degree programs available online. These programs allow professionals to upskill or specialize without a long-term commitment.

By exploring these online degree and certification options, students can tailor their educational journey to suit their career goals, budget, and timeline.

Best Scientists Citing Benedetto Matarazzo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles