World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip S. Holzman

Philip S. Holzman

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
14966
World Ranking
2508
National Ranking
1453

Philip S. Holzman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip S. Holzman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 279 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Philip S. Holzman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip S. Holzman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1988 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 1980 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Philip S. Holzman is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their academic focus is reflected through career longevity and recognition by prominent scientific organizations.

Holzman's awards include being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1980 and becoming a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 1988. These honors indicate engagement with significant scientific and medical communities.

While specific research topics, papers, coauthors, and primary publication venues are not listed, Holzman's affiliation and awards suggest a professional standing within their field. The absence of detailed publication or subfield data limits further precision in describing their research scope or specialization.

Best Publications

  • Schizophrenics show spatial working memory deficits.

    Sohee Park;Philip S. Holzman

  • Eye-tracking dysfunctions in schizophrenic patients and their relatives.

    Philip S. Holzman;Leonard R. Proctor;Deborah L. Levy;Nicholas J. Yasillo

  • Eye-Tracking Patterns in Schizophrenia

    Unknown

  • Cognitive Control: A Study of Individual Consistencies in Cognitive Behavior

    Unknown

  • Spatial working memory deficits in the relatives of schizophrenic patients.

    Sohee Park;Philip S. Holzman;Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic

  • Functional neuroanatomy of antisaccade eye movements investigated with positron emission tomography

    Gillian A. O'Driscoll;Nathaniel M. Alpert;Steven W. Matthysse;Deborah L. Levy

  • A single dominant gene can account for eye tracking dysfunctions and schizophrenia in offspring of discordant twins.

    Philip S. Holzman;Einar Kringlen;Steven Matthysse;Steven D. Flanagan

  • Eye Tracking Dysfunction and Schizophrenia: A Critical Perspective

    Deborah L. Levy;Philip S. Holzman;Steven Matthysse;Nancy R. Mendell

  • Motion perception in schizophrenia.

    Yue Chen;Germán P. Palafox;Ken Nakayama;Deborah L. Levy

  • Antisaccades and smooth pursuit eye movements in schizophrenia

    Anne B. Sereno;Philip S. Holzman

  • Processing of global, but not local, motion direction is deficient in schizophrenia.

    Y. Chen;K. Nakayama;D. Levy;S. Matthysse

  • Smooth pursuit eye movements, attention, and schizophrenia.

    Philip S. Holzman;Deborah L. Levy;Leonard R. Proctor

  • Psychophysical isolation of a motion-processing deficit in schizophrenics and their relatives and its association with impaired smooth pursuit.

    Yue Chen;Ken Nakayama;Deborah L. Levy;Steven Matthysse

  • Eye Tracking and Schizophrenia: A Selective Review

    Deborah L. Levy;Philip S. Holzman;Steven Matthysse;Nancy R. Mendell

  • Antisaccades and Smooth Pursuit Eye Tracking and Schizotypy

    Gillian A. O'Driscoll;Mark F. Lenzenweger;Philip S. Holzman

  • Pursuit eye movement dysfunctions in schizophrenia. Family evidence for specificity.

    Unknown

  • Comparative studies of thought disorders. I. Mania and schizophrenia.

    Margie R. Solovay;Martha E. Shenton;Philip S. Holzman

  • Individual differences in spatial working memory in relation to schizotypy.

    Sohee Park;Philip S. Holzman;Mark F. Lenzenweger

  • Abnormal-Pursuit Eye Movements in Schizophrenia: Evidence for a Genetic Indicator

    Philip S. Holzman;Einar Kringlen;Deborah L. Levy;Leonard R. Proctor

  • Association of working memory deficit and eye tracking dysfunction in schizophrenia

    Sohee Park;Philip S. Holzman

  • Scoring manual for the Thought Disorder Index.

    Mary Hollis Johnston;Philip S. Holzman;Margie R. Solovay;Martha E. Shenton

  • Transitive inference in schizophrenia: impairments in relational memory organization.

    Debra Titone;Tali Ditman;Philip S Holzman;Howard Eichenbaum

  • Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements and Functional Psychoses: A Review

    Philip S. Holzman;Deborah L. Levy

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Coleman
Michael J. Coleman Brigham and Women's Hospital
Ken Nakayama
Ken Nakayama Harvard University
Martha E. Shenton
Martha E. Shenton Harvard University
Sohee Park
Sohee Park Vanderbilt University
Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd
Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd University of Utah
Mark F. Lenzenweger
Mark F. Lenzenweger Binghamton University
John M. Davis
John M. Davis University of Illinois at Chicago
L. Cinnamon Bidwell
L. Cinnamon Bidwell University of Colorado Boulder
Donald B. Rubin
Donald B. Rubin Temple University
Debra Titone
Debra Titone McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree can open doors to a variety of specialized career paths. One popular option is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role that is in high demand across the country. While many core requirements for MFT licensure share similarities, each region has specific standards aspiring professionals must meet.

For example, to learn about mft requirements in Tucson, candidates should review state-specific education and clinical training guidelines. Similarly, those exploring mft requirements in Tulsa will find distinct rules for practicum hours and supervised experience.

If you’re considering practicing in Virginia, it’s crucial to understand Virginia Beach mft certification requirements, as this location has its own licensure process. In the nation's capital, aspiring therapists should become familiar with how to become a marriage and family therapist in Washington DC and the necessary educational credentials.

These resources can help you choose the right academic program and chart a rewarding psychology career, no matter where you plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Philip S. Holzman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles