World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark F. Lenzenweger

Mark F. Lenzenweger

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
17886
World Ranking
2473
National Ranking
1434

Mark F. Lenzenweger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark F. Lenzenweger sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 179 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark F. Lenzenweger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark F. Lenzenweger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark F. Lenzenweger is affiliated with Binghamton University in the United States. Their research falls predominantly within the field of Psychology, with a strong focus on Clinical Psychology. Other subfields of interest include Philosophy, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Social Psychology.

Their work covers several main research topics, such as:

  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Lenzenweger has published multiple papers across various journals. Selected recent publications include:

  • The American Psychiatric Association Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia, 2020, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • The American Psychiatric Association Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia, 2020, FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry
  • Schizotypy 17 years on: Psychotic symptoms in midlife., 2021, Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  • Psychopathy, charisma, and success: A moderation modeling approach to successful psychopathy, 2021, Journal of Research in Personality
  • Exploring Identity Disturbance and Psychotic Spectrum Symptoms as Predictors of Borderline and Schizotypal Personality Disorders, 2021, Psychopathology

Frequent co-authors associated with Lenzenweger's research include Maria W. Meisner, Bo Bach, Lea S. Petersen, Erik Simonsen, and George A. Keepers.

Publication venues frequently featuring Lenzenweger's work are:

  • Psychopathology
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • Journal of Personality Disorders
  • American Journal of Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • DSM-IV personality disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.

    Mark F. Lenzenweger;Michael C. Lane;Armand W. Loranger;Ronald C. Kessler

  • Evaluating three treatments for borderline personality disorder: a multiwave study.

    John F. Clarkin;Kenneth N. Levy;Mark F. Lenzenweger;Otto F. Kernberg

  • Failure of frontolimbic inhibitory function in the context of negative emotion in borderline personality disorder.

    David Silbersweig;John F. Clarkin;Martin Goldstein;Otto F. Kernberg

  • The American Psychiatric Association Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia.

    George A Keepers;Laura J Fochtmann;Joan M Anzia;Sheldon Benjamin

  • The Continuous Performance Test, Identical Pairs version: II. Contrasting attentional profiles in schizophrenic and depressed patients.

    Barbara A. Cornblatt;Mark F. Lenzenweger;L. Erlenmeyer-Kimling

  • Epidemiology of personality disorders.

    Mark F. Lenzenweger;Mark F. Lenzenweger

  • The Inventory of Personality Organization: psychometric properties, factorial composition, and criterion relations with affect, aggressive dyscontrol, psychosis proneness, and self-domains in a nonclinical sample.

    Mark F. Lenzenweger;John F. Clarkin;Otto F. Kernberg;Pamela A. Foelsch

  • Trait-state artifacts and the diagnosis of personality disorders.

    Armand W. Loranger;Mark F. Lenzenweger;Alison F. Gartner;Virginia Lehmann Susman

  • Detecting Personality Disorders in a Nonclinical Population: Application of a 2-Stage Procedure for Case Identification

    Mark F. Lenzenweger;Armand W. Loranger;Lauren Korfine;Cynthia Neff

  • Major Theories of Personality Disorder

    John F. Clarkin;Mark F. Lenzenweger;W. J. Livesley

  • Stability and Change in Personality Disorder Features: The Longitudinal Study of Personality Disorders

    Mark F. Lenzenweger

  • Schizotypy and Schizophrenia: The View from Experimental Psychopathology

    Mark F. Lenzenweger

  • Individual growth curve analysis illuminates stability and change in Personality disorder features: The longitudinal study of personality disorders

    Mark F. Lenzenweger;Matthew D. Johnson;John B. Willett

  • Confirming the latent structure and base rate of schizotypy: a taxometric analysis.

    Mark F. Lenzenweger;Lauren Korfine

  • Positive and Negative Schizophrenic Symptoms, Attention, and Information Processing

    Barbara A. Cornblatt;Mark F. Lenzenweger;Robert H. Dworkin;L. Erlenmeyer-Kimling

  • Psychometric High-risk Paradigm, Perceptual Aberrations, and Schizotypy: An Update

    Mark F. Lenzenweger

  • Executive neurocognition, memory systems, and borderline personality disorder.

    Eric A. Fertuck;Mark F. Lenzenweger;John F. Clarkin;Simone Hoermann

  • The Personality Disorders Institute/Borderline Personality Disorder Research Foundation randomized control trial for borderline personality disorder: rationale, methods, and patient characteristics.

    John F. Clarkin;Kenneth N. Levy;Mark F. Lenzenweger;Otto F. Kernberg

  • Schizotypy and sustained attention.

    Mark F. Lenzenweger;Barbara A. Cornblatt;Maribeth Putnick

  • A neurobehavioral dimensional model.

    Richard A. Depue;Mark F. Lenzenweger

  • Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment

    Mark F. Lenzenweger

Frequent Co-Authors

John F. Clarkin
John F. Clarkin Cornell University
Otto F. Kernberg
Otto F. Kernberg Cornell University
Robert H. Dworkin
Robert H. Dworkin University of Rochester Medical Center
Kenneth N. Levy
Kenneth N. Levy Pennsylvania State University
Aidan G. C. Wright
Aidan G. C. Wright University of Pittsburgh
Aaron L. Pincus
Aaron L. Pincus Pennsylvania State University
Niels G. Waller
Niels G. Waller University of Minnesota
Richard A. Depue
Richard A. Depue Cornell University
Philip S. Holzman
Philip S. Holzman Harvard University
Sohee Park
Sohee Park Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens doors to a wide range of specializations and career options. Many respected colleges and universities offer flexible online programs, allowing you to study from anywhere while matching the academic quality of their on-campus offerings.

Each region features schools with unique strengths. For example, the top psychology programs in Greenville focus on innovative research and hands-on learning. Meanwhile, the best psychology degree programs ranking in Houston highlights institutions with strong clinical pathways and ties to major hospitals.

If you’re interested in broader regional options, the best psychology program rankings in the Midwest cover top universities known for advanced counseling and research opportunities. Similarly, the top psychology programs in Nebraska offer targeted online concentrations in areas such as child psychology or behavioral health.

Whether you want to pursue clinical practice, research, counseling, or industrial-organizational roles, online psychology degrees provide a flexible and respected route to a dynamic, rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Mark F. Lenzenweger

Trending Scientists