World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
8134
World Ranking
6954
National Ranking
79

Neus Barrantes-Vidal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neus Barrantes-Vidal sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 268 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Neus Barrantes-Vidal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neus Barrantes-Vidal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neus Barrantes-Vidal is affiliated with the Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain. Their research focuses predominantly on psychology and medicine, with significant contributions in psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, philosophy, and social psychology.

The scientist's main topics of work encompass schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health research topics, mental health and psychiatry, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, personality disorders and psychopathology, tryptophan and brain disorders, and mental health treatment and access.

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment

Neus Barrantes-Vidal has contributed to a number of research articles. Recent papers include:

  • Attachment goes to court: child protection and custody issues, 2021, Attachment & Human Development
  • Development of Proteomic Prediction Models for Transition to Psychotic Disorder in the Clinical High-Risk State and Psychotic Experiences in Adolescence, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Association of multidimensional schizotypy with psychotic-like experiences, affect, and social functioning in daily life: Comparable findings across samples and schizotypy measures, 2020, Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  • Dysregulated Lipid Metabolism Precedes Onset of Psychosis, 2020, Biological Psychiatry
  • Positive, Negative, and Disorganized Schizotypy Predict Differential Patterns of Interview-Rated Schizophrenia-Spectrum Symptoms and Impairment, 2020, Assessment

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Neus Barrantes-Vidal are:

  • Thomas R. Kwapil
  • Mark van der Gaag
  • Stephan Ruhrmann
  • Gabriele Sachs
  • Philip McGuire

The scientist's work covers 116 publications in psychology and 69 in medicine, highlighting a multidisciplinary approach that integrates clinical applications with experimental and theoretical perspectives in mental health.

Best Publications

  • The Dimensional Structure of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales: Factor Identification and Construct Validity

    Thomas Richard Kwapil;Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Paul J. Silvia

  • Schizotypy: Looking Back and Moving Forward

    Thomas Richard Kwapil;Neus Barrantes-Vidal

  • The Role of Schizotypy in the Study of the Etiology of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders

    Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Phillip Grant;Thomas Richard Kwapil

  • Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia: Contemporary Challenges for Integrated, Large-scale Investigations

    Jim van Os;Jim van Os;Bart P. Rutten;Inez Myin-Germeys;Philippe Delespaul

  • Early adversity and 5-HTT/BDNF genes: new evidence of gene-environment interactions on depressive symptoms in a general population.

    M. Aguilera;B. Arias;Marieke Wichers;N. Barrantes-Vidal

  • Anxiety and depression symptoms in psychometrically identified schizotypy

    Kathryn E. Lewandowski;Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Rosemery O. Nelson-Gray;Carolina Clancy

  • Prediction of Psychopathology and Functional Impairment by Positive and Negative Schizotypy in the Chapmans’ Ten-year Longitudinal Study

    Thomas Richard Kwapil;Georgina M. Gross;Paul J. Silvia;Neus Barrantes-Vidal

  • The expression of positive and negative schizotypy in daily life: An experience sampling study

    T R Kwapil;L H Brown;P J Silvia;Inez Myin-Germeys

  • Positive and negative schizotypy are associated with prodromal and schizophrenia- spectrum symptoms

    Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Georgina M. Gross;Tamara Sheinbaum;Mercè Mitjavila

  • Creativity & Madness Revisited from Current Psychological Perspectives.

    Neus Barrantes-Vidal

  • Development and psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale: A new measure for assessing positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy

    Thomas Richard Kwapil;Thomas Richard Kwapil;Georgina M. Gross;Paul J. Silvia;Michael L. Raulin

  • Schizotypy From a Developmental Perspective

    Martin Debbané;Neus Barrantes-Vidal

  • The structure of schizotypal personality traits: a cross-national study

    E. Fonseca-Pedrero;Martin Debbané;Martin Debbané;J. Ortuño-Sierra;R. C. K. Chan

  • Psychometric schizotypy predicts psychotic-like, paranoid, and negative symptoms in daily life.

    Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Charlotte A. Chun;Inez Myin-Germeys;Thomas R. Kwapil

  • Neurocognitive, behavioural and neurodevelopmental correlates of schizotypy clusters in adolescents from the general population

    Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Lourdes Fañanás;Araceli Rosa;Beatriu Caparrós

  • Attachment style predicts affect, cognitive appraisals, and social functioning in daily life

    Tamara Sheinbaum;Thomas R. Kwapil;Sergi Ballespí;Mercè Mitjavila

  • Attachment goes to court: child protection and custody issues

    Tommie Forslund;Pehr Granqvist;Marinus H van IJzendoorn;Avi Sagi-Schwartz

  • An experience-sampling study of depressive symptoms and their social context.

    Leslie H. Brown;Timothy Strauman;Þ Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Þ Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Paul J. Silvia

  • Psychopathology, social adjustment and personality correlates of schizotypy clusters in a large nonclinical sample

    Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Kathryn E. Lewandowski;Thomas Richard Kwapil

  • Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Psychotic-Like Symptoms and Stress Reactivity in Daily Life in Nonclinical Young Adults

    Paula Cristóbal-Narváez;Tamara Sheinbaum;Sergi Ballespí;Mercè Mitjavila

  • Comparing the factor structure of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales and the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire

    Georgina M. Gross;Juliann Mellin;Paul J. Silvia;Neus Barrantes-Vidal

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas R. Kwapil
Thomas R. Kwapil University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jim van Os
Jim van Os University Medical Center Utrecht
Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Paul J. Silvia
Paul J. Silvia University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Lucia Valmaggia
Lucia Valmaggia King's College London
Stephan Ruhrmann
Stephan Ruhrmann University of Cologne
Anita Riecher-Rössler
Anita Riecher-Rössler University of Basel
Mark van der Gaag
Mark van der Gaag Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marie-Odile Krebs
Marie-Odile Krebs Université Paris Cité
Merete Nordentoft
Merete Nordentoft University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Psychology in the USA opens many doors, especially if you are considering a career in mental health counseling. Online psychology degrees can pave the way for various specializations, such as clinical psychology, counseling, or school psychology. These flexible degree programs are ideal if you want to balance work and study.

To become a mental health counselor, you must be aware of certification and education requirements that can differ significantly by location. For instance, Anaheim mental health counselor certification requirements include specific supervised hours and state exams. Meanwhile, mental health counselor requirements in Anchorage emphasize regionally accredited master’s degrees online or on-campus.

Aspiring counselors should also review the Arlington mental health counselor certification requirements and the Atlanta mental health counselor education requirements. Each location details unique licensing steps, supervised experience periods, and exam expectations.

Ultimately, an online psychology degree can support a range of professional goals in mental health, social work, or research. Check local guidelines before applying to programs to ensure your credentials will meet state licensing demands.

Best Scientists Citing Neus Barrantes-Vidal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles