World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
56
Citations
12304
World Ranking
3625
National Ranking
1382

Huisheng Bian publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Huisheng Bian sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 147 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Huisheng Bian D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Huisheng Bian sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Huisheng Bian is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore County in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant focus on Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science.

The scientist's publication record includes numerous contributions to topics related to atmospheric processes and environmental impacts. The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Climate Change and Geoengineering

Frequent publication venues for Huisheng Bian feature journals specializing in atmospheric and environmental sciences. These venues are:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Communications Earth & Environment
  • Nature Geoscience
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

The following recent papers illustrate the scope and focus of their research work:

  • Six global biomass burning emission datasets: intercomparison and application in one global aerosol model, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Widespread biomass burning smoke throughout the remote troposphere, 2020, Nature Geoscience
  • The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere, 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Dominant role of mineral dust in cirrus cloud formation revealed by global-scale measurements, 2022, Nature Geoscience

Huisheng Bian has collaborated frequently with a group of researchers in related fields. Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Mian Chin
  • Peter R. Colarco
  • Toshihiko Takemura
  • Zak Kipling
  • Hitoshi Matsui

Best Publications

  • Mineral Dust Entrainment and Deposition (DEAD) model: Description and 1990s dust climatology

    Charles S. Zender;Huisheng Bian;David Newman

  • Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations

    Gunnar Myhre;Bjørn Hallvard Samset;M. Schulz;Y. Balkanski

  • The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models

    K. Tsigaridis;K. Tsigaridis;N. Daskalakis;N. Daskalakis;M. Kanakidou;P. J. Adams

  • A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic

    D. T. Shindell;M. Chin;F. Dentener;R. M. Doherty

  • The fertilizing role of African dust in the Amazon rainforest: A first multiyear assessment based on data from Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations

    Hongbin Yu;Hongbin Yu;Mian Chin;Tianle Yuan;Tianle Yuan;Huisheng Bian;Huisheng Bian

  • TransCom model simulations of CH4 and related species: linking transport, surface flux and chemical loss with CH4 variability in the troposphere and lower stratosphere

    P. K. Patra;S. Houweling;Maarten Krol;Maarten Krol;P. Bousquet

  • Multi-decadal aerosol variations from 1980 to 2009: a perspective from observations and a global model

    Mian Chin;T. Diehl;T. Diehl;Q. Tan;Q. Tan;J. M. Prospero

  • Fast-J2: Accurate Simulation of Stratospheric Photolysis in Global Chemical Models

    Huisheng Bian;Michael J. Prather

  • Six global biomass burning emission datasets: intercomparison and application in one global aerosol model

    Xiaohua Pan;Xiaohua Pan;Charles Ichoku;Mian Chin;Huisheng Bian;Huisheng Bian

  • AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations

    Jonas Gliß;Augustin Mortier;Michael Schulz;Elisabeth Andrews

  • Black carbon vertical profiles strongly affect its radiative forcing uncertainty

    Bjørn Hallvard Samset;Gunnar Myhre;M. Schulz;Y. Balkanski

  • Aerosols from Overseas Rival Domestic Emissions over North America

    Hongbin Yu;Hongbin Yu;Lorraine A. Remer;Mian Chin;Huisheng Bian;Huisheng Bian

  • Quantification of Trans-Atlantic Dust Transport from Seven-year (2007-2013) Record of CALIPSO Lidar Measurements

    Hongbin Yu;Hongbin Yu;Mian Chin;Huisheng Bian;Huisheng Bian;Tianle Yuan;Tianle Yuan

  • Mineral dust and global tropospheric chemistry: Relative roles of photolysis and heterogeneous uptake

    Huisheng Bian;Huisheng Bian;Charles S. Zender

  • Modelled black carbon radiative forcing and atmospheric lifetime in AeroCom Phase II constrained by aircraft observations

    B. H. Samset;G. Myhre;Andreas Herber;Yutaka Kondo

  • Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom Prescribed intercomparison study

    Phillip Stier;Nick A. Schutgens;N. Bellouin;N. Bellouin;Huisheng Bian;Huisheng Bian

  • Dominant role of mineral dust in cirrus cloud formation revealed by global-scale measurements

    Unknown

  • Investigation of global particulate nitrate from the AeroCom phase III experiment

    Huisheng Bian;Huisheng Bian;Mian Chin;Didier A. Hauglustaine;Michael Schulz

  • A satellite‐based assessment of transpacific transport of pollution aerosol

    Hongbin Yu;Hongbin Yu;Lorraine A. Remer;Mian Chin;Huisheng Bian;Huisheng Bian

  • Evaluation of the aerosol vertical distribution in global aerosol models through comparison against CALIOP measurements: AeroCom phase II results

    Brigitte Koffi;Michael Schulz;Francois‐Marie Bréon;Frank Dentener

  • A multi-model evaluation of aerosols over South Asia: common problems and possible causes

    X. Pan;M. Chin;R. Gautam;H. Bian;H. Bian

  • ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols

    S.C. Wofsy;S. Afshar;H.M. Allen;E.C. Apel

Frequent Co-Authors

Mian Chin
Mian Chin Goddard Space Flight Center
Hongbin Yu
Hongbin Yu Goddard Space Flight Center
Thomas Diehl
Thomas Diehl Goddard Space Flight Center
Kostas Tsigaridis
Kostas Tsigaridis Columbia University
Michael Schulz
Michael Schulz Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Susanne E. Bauer
Susanne E. Bauer Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Toshihiko Takemura
Toshihiko Takemura Kyushu University
Lorraine A. Remer
Lorraine A. Remer University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Nicolas Bellouin
Nicolas Bellouin University of Reading
Gunnar Myhre
Gunnar Myhre Center for International Climate and Environmental Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career opportunities. Many students enhance their expertise by exploring specialized fields through online programs. For instance, a geology online degree offers a deeper understanding of Earth's physical processes, which is crucial for environmental assessment and management roles.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly valuable in environmental careers for spatial analysis and data visualization. Many professionals look to the best GIS programs available online to build this expertise and improve their employability.

Additionally, those aiming for leadership or policy-making positions often pursue management degrees. Online programs like the mpa one year offer an accelerated path to public administration skills essential for driving sustainable environmental initiatives.

Understanding social dynamics is another key aspect of environmental work. Many students combine their science background with social insights through online bachelors degree programs in sociology, helping them address the human impacts and policy challenges linked to environmental issues.

Best Scientists Citing Huisheng Bian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles